Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

71% Positive

Analyzed from 441 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#companies#party#government#didn#offshore#moving#tax#nice#whatever#cannot

Discussion (24 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

bubblethink17 minutes ago
This is a nice trick. Since SCOTUS barred universal injunctions, the government can implement whatever batshit ideology they want until the case makes its way through the judicial system. Often that is a year or two. And even if it is eventually vacated, like the tariffs or the previous iteration of this fee, the damage is already done, as you cannot go back in time.
hn_submitabout 2 hours ago
Wasn't this struck down because by law the Federal Government can only charge the cost of producing a visa? The amount cannot be arbitrary in any way.

Or has the Trump Administration found a workaround for this?

iAMkenough25 minutes ago
The workaround is not caring and doing it anyways, letting the taxpayers pay for endless appeals
bellowsgulchabout 1 hour ago
I vote for Democrats. Sad they didn't step up for American tech workers though, and the guy shitting himself did.
the_optimistabout 1 hour ago
why?
bellowsgulch42 minutes ago
Track record of the Democratic party vs the Republican party
FatherOfCursesabout 2 hours ago
In other words, companies who rely on H1B visas are not donating enough to Trump 2028 or the Republican party.
wtfHN26about 4 hours ago
Most likely these companies will set up GCCs offshore. Moving the jobs abroad.

Whatever tax and living + lifestyle expenses that USA economy was making from H1B's will be gone.

Good for the rest of the world.

rayinerabout 4 hours ago
Nothing stops those companies from moving offshore anyway. If being in the U.S. didn’t offer advantages they wouldn’t be here to begin with. At some point americans are going to have to start having faith that their own country and people are a competitive edge against other countries.
add-sub-mul-divabout 1 hour ago
There's certainly fewer barriers to offshoring now that employees have insisted there's no benefit to being onsite.
Daishimanabout 1 hour ago
> If being in the U.S. didn’t offer advantages they wouldn’t be here to begin with.

For companies hiring H1Bs it's about being closer to clients and colleagues and just being managerially far easier than opening an offshore office, but the benefit isn't infinite and once companies have the chops for opening new offices they'll turn down the H1B hiring.

The issue for the US is that, are you're saying, "having faith in your own country" only works if you have the process for developing unnaturally skillfull talent, which is just not going to happen once the smart people stop moving to the US as countries have uniformly distributed talent potential.

lingua_francaabout 3 hours ago
The government can penalize companies for doing so.
potatokingabout 3 hours ago
Not really.. Corporations have enough holdings abroad to survive and kill a party or two.
lingua_francaabout 2 hours ago
Any examples?
toomuchtodoabout 1 hour ago
The HIRE Act: 25% tax on outsourcing - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45161419 - September 2025

Ohio senator introduces 25% tax on companies that outsource jobs overseas - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45146528 - September 2025

cyanydeezabout 4 hours ago
oh that's an optimistic view; more likely they slip some more bills into omni-trumps hands and this is silently dropped.

Assume grift first when any American regulation is proposed.

throwa356262about 2 hours ago
All Canada needs to do to become the center of innovation now is to... become 10°C warmer.
whoamiiabout 1 hour ago
This is why their forests are currently burning
_aavaa_about 2 hours ago
Warmer would help, but the latitude difference still gets you on sun height and hours of daylight in the winter months.
throwa356262about 2 hours ago
I dont know, warm weather but not too much direct sunlight could actually be a good thing.
jerlamabout 2 hours ago
They're getting a nice assist from global warming.