Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 177 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#cri#hit#building#title#runtime#build#https#com#says#right

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

chrisweekly38 minutes ago
How does this compare to "smolvm" microvms from https://smolmachines.com?
k8sifyabout 1 hour ago
Can’t wait to play with this, thank you great work!
realexwebabout 1 hour ago
thanks.. let me know how it goes or if you hit any issues
jeffbeeabout 2 hours ago
It looks cool and I am building it r.n. but the submission title was a little misleading as it says "container ... runtime" right there, and I guess it is, but it is not a CRI implementation.
realexwebabout 2 hours ago
Fair, and it's not CRI. The README's limits section says "Not a Kubernetes runtime. No CRI. Use containerd or CRI-O." I meant runtime in the docker/podman sense, pull and build and lifecycle in one binary, and you're right that the word is overloaded enough that the title doesn't carry that by itself.

Since you're building it, two things you'll hit before you hit the docs. cargo install needs the package name, because it searches the whole repo and finds three packages with binaries (the CLI, the fuzz harness, the Windows shim):

cargo install --git https://github.com/getkern/kern getkern --locked

And a source build is 1.91 MB, not the 1.5 in the title. The release binary is smaller because CI builds it with a pinned nightly, build-std and optimize_for_size, on an opt-level="z" profile; the source stays plain stable Rust on purpose, so building doesn't need nightly.

Interested in what breaks.