Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 7676 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#twitter#nitter#still#bluesky#xcancel#https#post#musk#com#account

Discussion (248 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

raphmanabout 4 hours ago
Not much detail so far.

> We have received cease and desist letters. Awaiting legal advice at the moment, but for now expect all nitter instances to remain down for the foreseeable future.

[for all those who - like me - first check the comments before clicking on the link]

orange9999 minutes ago
"For the forseeable future" doesn't sound very good. It's a vague phrase, but it usually isn't used to describe something that will change next week or even next month.

"For the time being" would have sounded like less bad wording than "for the forseeable future."

b112about 3 hours ago
Are they expecting legal advice to take a long tine?! It's fairly reasonable to check with a lawyer first, before damaging yourself by complying.

The legal system gets this concept. Otherwise random, unwarranted desist orders from your enemies could break you.

Anyone can send an request.

Weird.

sillysaurusxabout 3 hours ago
Legal advice costs a lot of money unless you find a lawyer doing it for free, which is rare.

I agree with the spirit of your comment though. More resistance would be a good thing. It’s just unfortunate how it seems to cost like $20k to $100k.

Nitter should put up a request for donations for legal fees. Lots of people are willing.

bambaxabout 2 hours ago
They should respond with a poop emoji, which is what Musk sends to people he doesn't care about.
zamadatix40 minutes ago
Musk can afford to be childish about legal challenges because the outcome doesn't really matter to him.
tossit444about 3 hours ago
From Nitter matrix group:

basically, it demands that I:

1. Permanently take down nitter.net and the GitHub repository, and delete all "X Data" in both 2. Stop all use of the "Twitter" and "X" marks 3. Cease all access to X data, including copies 4. Delete all X account credentials and session tokens 5. Confirm compliance in writing within three business days

The claims asserted are breach of X's Terms of Service, Developer Agreement and Developer Policy; the Texas Harmful Access by Computer Act; and the Lanham Act. It threatens litigation against me personally. X states it has also sent notice to GitHub and to my domain registrar.

phatfish35 minutes ago
So much free speech.
scosman15 minutes ago
A new case where the "free as in speech, not free as in beer" clarification helps.
pessimizerabout 1 hour ago
> 1. Permanently take down nitter.net and the GitHub repository[...]

This is the one that they know they have absolutely no grounds to demand, which is why they started with it. Everything else can be conformed with without even really damaging Nitter (the project.)

> 4. Delete all X account credentials and session tokens

could be trouble for individual servers, but is on legally shaky ground, and servers can simply go down at the first strong challenge and open back up under another name. Nitter the project doesn't need to have any credentials or tokens.

NoboruWatayaabout 4 hours ago
What is the main use case for X these days? Is it still as popular as it used to be? Clearly the exodus that happened when Musk took it over didn't kill it but I do seem to see fewer links to it than I used to.

Whenever I do see it linked on here it seems to be because one of the big tech CEOs has said something on it.

dwedgeabout 3 hours ago
This is only tenuously related but every single Mac app I see advertised on X by verified accounts is malware. I reported one last week to them, they said it's not malware. I appealed it and said the install link is copy and paste obfuscated base64 into your terminal, and they said after review it doesn't break their terms.

So whatever else they do, they take money to knowingly promote malware.

jerlamabout 2 hours ago
It's not just Mac apps. A Twitter ad is a negative indicator, and makes me less interested in the product.
Brendinoooabout 3 hours ago
>What is the main use case for X these days?

I use it to follow people who either have ideas I find interesting or do stuff I find interesting, and typically I'm looking for accounts that are small enough that I know they will at least see my replies, and often interact with them. (Something like 3K-15K followers for most of them, I think.)

I also think it's indispensable for real-time commentary and niche commentary on current events: always requires grains of salt but there's just no better place on the Internet for that sort of thing, in part because...

It's the one major social network I'm on where it is easy to view only posts from the people I follow, in reverse chronological order. A feed I TRULY control (and, if you follow the right people, insulates you from much of the nonsense on the site).

And every once in awhile, some insane viral nonsense pokes in that makes you say "how could I ever quit this site". There's a certain genre of satirical accounts that is very entertaining as well. Definitely a guilty pleasure component to it all!

>Is it still as popular as it used to be?

A quick search roughly aligns with my perception: it bottomed out a couple of years ago and has gradually recovered, though not to where it was pre-X.

kemayoabout 2 hours ago
> It's the one major social network I'm on where it is easy to view only posts from the people I follow, in reverse chronological order.

Oh weird, I'd rate X as medium-hard for that amongst the microposting sites I look at. Mastodon and Bluesky both default to almost-that, varying mostly in whether you need to jump through hoops to not see reposts.

X was always the one that (a) doesn't default to it, and (b) would keep "forgetting" and pushing you back to the algorithmic feed.

Brendinoooabout 2 hours ago
>amongst the microposting sites I look at

"major" was doing a bit of work for me. Facebook, Instagram, Reddit were more in mind when I said that.

>would keep "forgetting" and pushing you back

This hasn't happened to me in awhile. Dunno if it was a transient thing, an app thing, or something that has been reversed.

frereubuabout 3 hours ago
In a UK context, journalists are on there because politicians are on there... and politicians are on there because journalists are on there. It's politicians that need to pull the plug - if they left en masse the journalists would go where they went, even if they stayed on X too - but nobody has the balls to do it. (Aside from one politician who for all practical purposes seems to do absolutely nothing: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyrx1ee2r4o).
defrostabout 2 hours ago
A problem for the UK here is things like Rupert Lowe set to be paid as much for divisive posts on X as for being MP - https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/aug/24/rupert-lowe...
fg137about 3 hours ago
From what I can tell, most Twitter users outside English speaking countries don't care about who is the CEO at all. Business as usual.
miladyincontrolabout 3 hours ago
Thats sorta my situation, a scene I'm rather involved in has most the international users there, as such thats where things still live. Every other alternative has failed to gain enough traction for one reason or another.

Its usually either limited features, regional accessibility issues, or platforms like metas' just basically trading one big bad organization for another.

shaky-carrouselabout 2 hours ago
Here en Europe we all saw the owner of Xitter doing the Nazi salute. Can't talk about other regions but here we are well aware who the CEO is.
xtractoabout 1 hour ago
It's deplorable, but our president in Mexico recently was asked about some current affairs a d her answer was "ive written about it in X , go see it there" ...

As if X was an official government publishing channel . WTH, they should publish it on they official government pages.

burningChrome42 minutes ago
>> What is the main use case for X these days?

More of a political echo chamber than anything else. I mothballed my original account when things were getting spicy which was primarily focused on dev, UI/UX, and InfoSec news. I finally went back and have had some great interactions with people about technical stuff that interests me. Right now, the data center and AI discussions are getting intense along with Omarchy, lol. If you steer clear of the political stuff, you can find some good stuff still.

>> Is it still as popular as it used to be?

Probably not but it still ranks ahead of sites like Reddit. Its like the 13th, 14th most popular platform right now. I log on mainly just to see if I'm missing anything. Other than that, most of the engagement I have is curiosity and just fun stuff like seeing people posting retro games, stuff like that.

>> Whenever I do see it linked on here it seems to be because one of the big tech CEOs has said something on it.

X is now kind of the social media cul-de-sac . It used to be one of the go to places for breaking tech, popular cultural and political stuff. Now its usually two or three days late to the party on anything worthwhile. So the posts from the CEO probably made the rounds before you finally saw it on X. lol

Melatonic19 minutes ago
Its main use for myself was that posts were public by default so lots of government orgs and whatnot posted real time status updates. I never really used it except for occasionally checking those.

Now that more and more are going "walled garden" I don't get it at all

tokioyoyoabout 3 hours ago
Depends on the algos. My jp account sees none of that, mostly news, jokes and some random what’s happening in parts of Japan.

NA tuned account has more of what you said.

rootsudoabout 3 hours ago
The algos aren’t language neutral yet.

Yet. Japanese twitter users are a reflection of who they are, etc etc

Doesn’t mean there isn’t toxic stuff though.

tokioyoyoabout 2 hours ago
After some time, and muting/skipping through the usual japanese race-content, it’s more bearable. Fastest way for me to find the reason why a train line is down and etc.

Like last week my feed was all about Chiba flooding. Very relevant.

kyle-rbabout 3 hours ago
I haven't left because there are still circles of people I follow that haven't bailed. Once a large enough majority move to Bluesky, I'll start browsing that app more.

On the other hand, I might start posting on Bluesky more because as of a week ago, I'm shadowbanned on X. I know people throw that term around, but nobody on the site can see any of my reply tweets, even me (unless I scroll my account's 'replies' tab); people who've followed me for years are asking why their tweet has a ghost reply.

I don't think X has that much of an incentive to filter out bots while keeping around accounts like me (200 followers, will never pay for Premium). The slightly higher effort bots that glaze tech CEOs will be basically indistinguishable from the real people glazing tech CEOs because they're wannabe founders trying to network/cloutfarm. And that style of dead internet is fine with Elon.

pessimizerabout 1 hour ago
> as of a week ago, I'm shadowbanned on X. I know people throw that term around, but nobody on the site can see any of my reply tweets, even me

This is honestly the real value of nitter far beyond anti-Musk shriekers being obsessed with and addicted to X but not wanting to log into X. Nitter seems to simply give you everything - and you can plainly see which tweets are getting huge distribution and which ones nobody is seeing.

sillysaurusxabout 3 hours ago
That sounds infuriating. I hope you can recover your account.
kyle-rbabout 3 hours ago
My initial suspicion was that my account was flagged because I only used the web version (the PWA experience on mobile is pretty good) so I've been using the Android app the last few days, and I'll see if that has any signal on my account.

In another view days I'll try filing a support ticket, maybe claiming something like "I was mass-reported by DSA leftists for my right-wing views"; things along those lines have gotten some peoples' permanent suspensions lifted.

janejeonabout 3 hours ago
I'm surprised people didn't mention this, but I find it to be unbeatable in these two areas:

1. Japanese community 2. Porn (good god, so much porn)

vaylianabout 3 hours ago
There is a lot of Ukraine war reporting on twitter.
cmrdporcupineabout 2 hours ago
fwiw a lot of the key accounts for this now also post to both Bluesky and Mastodon
runjakeabout 2 hours ago
It’s still fairly popular, but the statistics show that X usage is gradually declining. Elon claims that X is more popular than ever, but the platform doesn’t publicly release its own stats, and publicly available stats say otherwise.

If you like AI and tech, there are some pretty thriving sub-communities. AI stuff, and a lot of tech stuff happens on X first. Claudebot/OpenClaw/Hermes all began on X months before I commonly saw them appear on other platforms.

spike021about 3 hours ago
I've made a lot of friends in Japan through shared interest communities that are mostly on twitter. Most are people I've actually met whenever I am in Japan.
anonzzziesabout 3 hours ago
Guess one has to, because there are just too many people on there. I don't like it but what can I do. What I hate the most is that states/countries, prime ministers and kings post on there. And that the emergency services of some countries have that as primary channel. I understand cross posting to the most popular social channels, but primary? That SHOULD be a local channel, not some dystopian shit hole you could be banned from randomly.
loegabout 2 hours ago
> What is the main use case for X these days?

The same as it ever was. Short-form gossip. News, discussion, jokes.

Leynosabout 2 hours ago
It's mostly a porn site these days
loegabout 2 hours ago
This is one of those situations where describing your algorithmic feed tells us more about you than about Twitter.
Markoffabout 2 hours ago
that's my experience with using anonymous search on Nitter instance as well, so hardly anything about me using it without any account
gdulliabout 3 hours ago
The biggest social networks can only die slowly. They have too much momentum for the the type of sudden exodus that was possible when the internet had not yet absorbed the entire population.
dredmorbiusabout 3 hours ago
Unless they're shut down.

G+ comes to mind.

(Several billion profiles, tens of millions active. Shut down 1 Apr 2019. Yes, April Fools' Day.)

yubblegumabout 2 hours ago
> What is the main use case for X these days?

twitter/x remains the domain of intelligence agencies worldwide. It is a semi-open (the world first virtual leader, the ayatollah affirms he exists from there ..) psychological operations platform that permits the avatars of "world leaders" to speak to masses and also hosts a parasitical community of grifters ("opinion makers" and "influencers") that feed off of the festering fetid matter served up by the Spook International.

a secondary purpose of the twitter/x is a reverse doomsday clock, based on above. As long as the ghost of this unprofitable "business entity" is kept alive by funny money and funny deals, we can sleep soundly at night knowing there won't be ww3 or any other such extreme negotiating tactics by global elite, since they are all 'playing their role' on twitter currently known as x.

SwellJoe17 minutes ago
I don't believe the extremism engine of Xitter is reducing the risk of global catastrophe. I think it's accelerating that risk. Certainly it helped elect Trump, and no one can argue that's been good for advancing the cause of peace on earth or avoiding several other causes of mass death.
bonoboTPabout 1 hour ago
AI research, computer vision/machine learning academic projects and papers, conferences.
Marha01about 3 hours ago
> What is the main use case for X these days?

There are lots of interesting people/orgs on X from AI/ML circles, as well as Ukraine war OSINT accounts and UA army helpers. I stay on X pretty much for these two topics.

TitaRusellabout 3 hours ago
Breaking news. If a bomb goes off or a plane goes down people post it to X.
shermantanktopabout 3 hours ago
Personally I have zero interest. If it's a big enough deal, it'll get to me somehow. Knowing about it 15s after it happened and then seeing a flood of uninformed speculation would be stressful.

Others do value that, no judgment, but for me it's be a net negative.

derbOacabout 2 hours ago
They post it other places also in my experience. Twitter doesn't have the monopoly on that it used to.
asdffabout 3 hours ago
I mean, if it is real it's on every wire service there is too, with slightly less hysteria.
Marsymarsabout 1 hour ago
I ventured onto Twitter for the first time in maybe a year to check on some breaking news around America/Canada tariffs and trade war.

The comment section was pretty awful; 90% people yelling about Canada's government being a tyranny and/or in bed with Communist China.

rasculabout 3 hours ago
There's lots of US sports content. That's all I use it for.
csomarabout 2 hours ago
I rarely use it (you need an account, so I need to add cancel to the url) but last time I had a "guest" account was two years ago and it was pretty much all bots. That being said, some (important) people or companies still use it for announcement but these are usually linked and xcancel works just fine.

I honestly have no idea if there are real people who actually use it daily. Who can read that stuff?

23asfdnbabout 3 hours ago
All journalists and politicians are there, including left wing. If you want to know e.g. what the Prime Minister of Pakistan really said instead of some news spin, you have to read his tweets.

It is an elite club, and Musk wants you to pay for it.

I don't know why it is legal for EU politicians to use this walled garden for important messages.

Someone outside of the US jurisdiction (China?) has to keep xcancel.com running.

bluecalmabout 3 hours ago
A lot of interesting people who do interesting things post on X. You can follow them and have interesting feed. You don't get it on FB/Insta or Tiktok.

>>Whenever I do see it linked on here it seems to be because one of the big tech CEOs has said something on it.

Yeah just a big tech CEOs posting (or an author of a big project, or an engineer working for a top lab), nothing to see here. On to another dancing teenager on TikTok. Let's watch some pranks or a "beauty influencer" on Insta where we are at it instead.

naaskingabout 3 hours ago
Linking to X is less useful than it used to be.
bee_riderabout 3 hours ago
IIRC you can’t even read a single post without an account, it is equivalent to posting a link to a private Facebook group or whatever from an outsider point of view.
naaskingabout 1 hour ago
You can read posts you link to directly, but no comments. That's what makes it less useful.
g-b-rabout 3 hours ago
It's actively harmful to many people, copy and paste the text if there's no other source
archagonabout 3 hours ago
White supremacist circle jerking and narcissistic "influencing." (Along with some international communities that, admittedly, don’t overlap with this muck at all.)

Recent choice words from Musk:

* "Anyone who opposes remigration is a traitor"

* "She is a traitor to the West, plain and simple" (in reference to his recent interviewer)

* "Deal with traitors before invaders. They are committing high treason."

* "First the traitors, then the invaders" (screenshot from Citizen Vigilante pointing gun at camera)

Per Nate Silver, Musk's is the most engaged-with account on Twitter by far, followed by his far-right allies: https://www.natesilver.net/p/social-media-has-become-a-freak...

So, yeah: open sewer.

pessimizerabout 1 hour ago
Musk is who you engage with on twitter. You're one of the people who makes his account the most engaged with. I follow tons of stuff on twitter, and have no idea what Musk is doing unless it gets in the mainstream news.
kijashdkujdfhas27 minutes ago
But you do use the white supremacist's platform, and presumably (given the prior post's examples) you're aware that he is a white supremacist.
archagonabout 1 hour ago
I'm not on Twitter at all because it doesn't feel good to use a social media platform owned by an ardent white supremacist directly responsible for the deaths of thousands in the third world. Blood money, blood attention.
lazzlazzlazzabout 3 hours ago
Incredibly unpopular opinion on Hacker News, but X remains the center of many circles, including tech. There is almost nothing posted on Hacker News that I haven't seen on X first, with better commentary.
shevy-javaabout 3 hours ago
Actually I retired from twitter before Musk, because twitter started to censor me. But of course once Musk took over, constantly raising his right arm, I knew twitter was dead. Here in Europe nobody wants to see selfish and ruthless right-wing nuts control ecosystems. Billionaires pulling the strings does not work; the USA need to learn this lesson first.
slaterabout 3 hours ago
Are you gonna tell us how Twitter started censoring you, or is this a "which opinions, mf-er" goose meme situation?
q8zd3about 4 hours ago
It's a social experiment about [variable] universal basic income
rogerrogerrabout 3 hours ago
Can you expand on this? I'm not tracking.
nemomarxabout 3 hours ago
They have those payouts for check marks? A lot of people post click bait for views to bring in small amounts of money, usually from a poorer country I think
KronisLVabout 2 hours ago
> What is the main use case for X these days? Is it still as popular as it used to be?

No idea comparatively, but an artist friend of mine tried out Bluesky and then complained about how there's way more of a limited reach and engagement there compared to Twitter.

giancarlostoroabout 3 hours ago
There's people from all walks of life and all corners of the internet on there still, good and bad. Twitter was always a darned mess, the only difference now is you can't just report people and bully them off the site.

Contrast to me trying to open BlueSky, and seeing death threats and other insane things. I've also heard (though never personally seen, nor do I want to) that BlueSky has a CSAM problem. Those two factors alone kept me from even trying it out.

What's really weird is there were a ton of claims that disappeared, about how X was full of bots, but X is the opposite of full of bots. Maybe there's one or another, but they're highly under the radar, X has improved their bot problem drastically.

Edit (tweaked some words, and wanted to add):

Then there was Threads, I am not in any way interested in "New Twitter" by Mark Zuckerberg, no thanks.

nobleachabout 3 hours ago
I really can't deal with BlueSky. I wanted to because I had a lot of good "starter packs" for NeoVim and OCaml development. Nerd stuff is the reason I visit these sites. The problem is, I start following people and it almost always turns into politics. I may even AGREE with the person's politics but I hate reading and talking about it. God forbid I ever disagree.

Funny thing though. I've heard the claims of "CSAM on Twitter" and now "CSAM on BlueSky". I've never had any of that ransomly show up. I do still have 2 or so random follows from clip-art female avatars with no tweets - per week. I've never quite figured out how that scam is supposed to work. I used to block 'em, now I ignore 'em.

numpad0about 2 hours ago
What actually show up consistently wherever "CSAM on ___" claims are used against, from Twitter to actual porn sites, or WWW in general, is large amount of contents related to anime and/or East Asians(often above 25) on a rapid constant growth and/or already dominating the place. Only rarely it's about actual CSAM.
ceroxylonabout 2 hours ago
I want to like Bluesky but have run into the same issue with politics as you.

Worse yet, people get so blinded that they lose the plot entirely... I asked someone about the accounting of a Palestinian fund raiser they were promoting.

They got very defensive so I looked into it, and it was a scam. I pointed this out to the poster to let them know, and they wrote a snide response which got their followers to brigade me.

xhevahirabout 2 hours ago
I don't know whether it's a founder effect of the users that fled there from X, or the mass-blocking features, but no site is as good at enforcing political orthodoxy as Bluesky. A near perfect echo chamber.
dokyunabout 3 hours ago
> Nerd stuff is the reason I visit these sites.

Fedi is a lot better if you want nerd stuff specifically, running instances attracts a lot of hackers who're geared toward it. The big instances are pretty much the same shlock you get on Twitter/Bluesky but there's a lot of cool people in the margins (tip: look for instances that aren't running Mastodon).

anonzzziesabout 3 hours ago
Never had issues with bluesky, but i'm a lurker and I have a llm filtering (here on HN, X, bluesky, reddit etc) which removes political stuff and boosts stuff I likely will like.
nemomarxabout 3 hours ago
If you look at the replies to basically any big post, you'll see all the blue checkmark bots in there. Usually just copying posts, sometimes doing a weird ai summary of the original post in a way that isn't actually replying to it.

I've got no idea if they're somehow making money off it or what's up

tuesdaynightabout 3 hours ago
Followed by the porn bots, the racist bots, the "American" bot, etc. I'm really surprised how someone can use X and say that it is not full of bots. It's the same on Reddit.
numpad0about 3 hours ago
> I've also heard (though never personally seen, nor do I want to) that BlueSky has a CSAM problem.

There really isn't, unless you mean anime content(of both SFW and NSFW alike) by "CSAM". In case you mean by that, then there is, otherwise no. It also appears to be highly locale dependent - some say they see timeline filled to the brim with fetish furry images and male gay nudity dressed with right wing politics, but my timeline is like just Twitter 2014 stuck at 3AM without any of those. I don't use any filters or blocklists, the place seem naturally nice-ish.

> about how X was full of bots

They appear to have largely given up and scaled back efforts to replace existing social graphs by funding African/Middle Eastern/Indian/South Asian content farms under the guise of revenue sharing programs, burning out talents west to east, likely with the conclusion that they're all equally incapable of understanding contents posted on Twitter even without the language barrier, let alone gaining popularity and even with literal algorithmic manipulations. Or they just burned through quite a deep talent pool globally.

That effort started after Twitter was bought, beginning around South Africa or Nigeria. So it's not an improvement, unless you count someone ceasing hostility as an improvement.

utopiahabout 3 hours ago
> There's people from all walks of life and all corners of the internet on there still, good and bad.

No, not really, it's only people who are fine or apathetic about the CEO of that platform doing a Nazi salute in front of cameras, twice. It is a very specific kind of people.

toleranceabout 3 hours ago
I would love to see a visual representation of what you think those sort of people look like.
hypferabout 3 hours ago
Not really.

I mean you'd wish that that was the case, but the reality is even bleaker. The "specific kind" is not all that specific.

Like yeah, of course, the crypto, AI and business grifters are a lot louder on Twitter now, but.. wouldn't say that they're not on HN as well, so.

I mean I understand that you would want to shame people into leaving that platform, but to feel shame you first need to be present in the room and conversation. Apathic people on autopilot are not even taking part in the conversation you'd like to have. They just scroll.

smith7018about 3 hours ago
I genuinely can't take this comment seriously if you think BlueSky has a CSAM and bullying problem while staying on X.
golf1052about 3 hours ago
ErroneousBoshabout 3 hours ago
Bluesky has a weed problem, but eventually you can tune the algorithm to only show you thirty or forty posts about weed every day.
numpad0about 3 hours ago
I think those are ultimately a locale dependent content bandwidth problem. Unwanted content has to be recommended if there were nothing else to show. Discovery feed on bsky.app gives me game news, local news, cat pics, some center-left politics, manga panels, food pics, random personal updates, cat pics, all warm and fuzzy stuffs.

I don't get any CSAM, alt-right, nazism, weed, ragebaits, unwanted gay contents. Simply none of those. But I don't normally set the language to English, and I suspect that might have to do with not getting those stuffs.

criddellabout 3 hours ago
devmorabout 3 hours ago
> I've also heard (though never personally seen, nor do I want to) that BlueSky has a CSAM problem.

I left X permanently because the unfathomable amount of CSAM being generated by Grok, without seeing it myself, sickened me to the point of no return.

I don’t use Bluesky but it seems to me that if this is a real concern to you, then you should have left X as well.

criddellabout 3 hours ago
I only log in to X a couple times a month, but the only type of Grok post I've ever seen is somebody retweeting a post and adding something like "grok, is this true?".
sillysaurusxabout 2 hours ago
I’ve been writing an HN clone that’s literally a clone. It copies all front page posts and comments. I just wanted to say publicly that dang is awesome. Instead of shutting down the idea, he’s been actively helping the project by answering periodic emails and… well, not shutting it down.

Not sure what to do with it yet. Maybe I could let users have custom filtering rules. But the point is, companies should support community projects like this, not throw around ToS violation claims like they’d hold up in court.

Eridrusabout 1 hour ago
This makes sense for HN as a marketing project for YC.

This doesn't make sense for ad supported platforms where the value is the eyeballs on their site.

sillysaurusxabout 1 hour ago
To be clear, no ads. I might have a donation link just to cover hosting costs, but I'm not trying to extract money out of this. I have a full time job for that. This is just an art project.
scosman17 minutes ago
yeah, it's X that has ads. Which is why they wouldn't be as receptive as HN.
anigbrowlabout 1 hour ago
Then again HN doesn't have ad revenue to protect, and you can only spend Karma at a limited number of retailers.
DANmodeabout 1 hour ago
Hacker News custom apps don’t threaten the revenue the parent (YC) makes.
RealityVoidabout 1 hour ago
I would like for things to be so, but these platforms relief on you being on their platform, hooked on their algorithms, delivering them data. They need this in order to make money. HN is not monetized like this, so of course they're more lax. But I don't expect this to be possible for many other social media sites.
GeoAtreides28 minutes ago
you're infringing HN users' copyright (and possible other rights as well), as they haven't granted you a license to copy, store and republish their content
sillysaurusx12 minutes ago
Some further analysis that argues this is fair use: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49440395

There's also going to be an opt-out feature: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49439657

8note21 minutes ago
they certainly havr given that license

otherwise my browser could not make reproductions and store caches

GeoAtreides10 minutes ago
they have granted a licence to HN (and YC-affiliated companies), not anyone else. It's that licence that permits HN, and HN only, to send users' content to your browser
Melatonic24 minutes ago
Didn't realise everything I posted online was copyrighted by default
TheBicPen13 minutes ago
Any creative work you create is copyrighted by default as soon as it is recorded onto some medium, at least in the US. https://www.copyright.gov/what-is-copyright/
smalltorchabout 2 hours ago
Is it available? Would like to peek around, I also made a clone. There are lots of little details about the HN ui that were difficult to get just right.
sillysaurusxabout 2 hours ago
Oh no way, a fellow HN cloning nerd! Hi!

You’re absolutely right. It’s taken almost daily work from April till now, but I finally have almost everything. Navigation links were particularly tricky. I’d love to see yours too.

Right now it’s running locally on my laptop, but I plan to deploy it to https://news.ycombinator.lol soon. I was gonna make AI generated comments but the API costs are pretty high.

Source is fully available: https://github.com/shawwn/sharc

I started with arc 3.2, which is ancient, and implemented every missing feature one by one until I’ve mostly run out. https://github.com/shawwn/sharc/tree/main/docs/agents/handof... shows a chronological journal of the whole process.

Is yours up somewhere? Would love to compare notes.

EDIT: Here's a side by side screenshot:

HN Simulator: https://i.imgur.com/iZk5ypK.png

HN: https://i.imgur.com/ZocuK0L.png

It's fun to tab back and forth and look at the diffs.

ButlerianJihadabout 2 hours ago
Creating a clone is basically violating all copyrights of every commenter and contributor here on Hacker News. We could all get together and inundate you with DMCA takedown for our Intellectual Property. We still retain copyright and all rights to our User Content, while we've granted YC a non-exclusive license to it. Scraping and cloning is also a violation of HN's TOS.

https://www.ycombinator.com/legal/

It's not your content, and you're cheating us all!

datadrivenangelabout 2 hours ago
hackernews clone but all the comments are AI would be kinda funny.
krappabout 1 hour ago
I used to contribute to Anarki but the lack of any reasonable error reporting made it insufferable, and I don't want to learn enough about compiler design and Racket to get a stack trace working. Good to see people are still working on Arc forks.
all2about 1 hour ago
I also made a clone. I haven't touched it in months. I was going to put it on one of my domains and decided not to until I can sort out moderation and all that. I'm not sure I want to be on the hook for moderating a forum full time.
Markoffabout 2 hours ago
On related note I really like serializer.io to read HN (I disable other sites it supports) in chronological order and have it synced across multiple devices under unique URL
seizethecheeseabout 2 hours ago
Political stuff notwithstanding, I used to be an active X user with a large following, but stopped using it because I couldn't configure a client that reliably allowed me to 1) consume a non-algorithmic feed and 2) disable videos and photos in the feed. It's really quite a bummer to be forced into the engagement maximizing app.
runjakeabout 2 hours ago
You bring up a lot of good points, so just some general tips for other readers.

> Political stuff notwithstanding

Don't follow people who post about politics and use muting and mute words liberally.

> consume a non-algorithmic feed

New-ish: Following -> Latest. As an aside, the supposed algorithm is on GitHub[1].

> disable videos and photos in the feed

uBlock or Control Panel for Twitter.

1. https://github.com/xai-org/x-algorithm

ThouYSabout 3 hours ago
"The public town square" where you need an account to lurk
yubblegumabout 2 hours ago
It's a feature not a bug ..
Melatonic14 minutes ago
Is XCancel separate ? They have a page up as well
orange9993 minutes ago
XCancel is a different website, but they just put up a notice literally a few minutes ago saying that they're also shutting down until they get legal advice. For the past few hours, xcancel had been marginally functional (constantly giving you an error message if you tried more than 2 or 3 searches at a time), but now the website is down altogether.

Twitterwebviewer is still up, but I always preferred nitter and xcancel. And I wouldn't be surprised if twitterwebviewer also goes offline in the next day or two.

solarkraftabout 3 hours ago
This is ultimately X’s problem. Remove the ways to consume its content, remove its relevance.

If at all, people should only fully quote content or post screenshots now.

kelvinjps10about 3 hours ago
I would literally stop opening twitter links, for me the utility of twitter is not having an account, but sometimes certain projects or governments and businesses use it for announcements. Before Musk put the login only for seeing tweets and comments, I would use regular twitter and when they did that I switched to nitter. (I had an account for some time but it was a complete was of time)
mnlsabout 3 hours ago
Nitter is a great project, way lighter than using Twitter and gets the job done if you want to check few accounts. I have a list of 30 accounts that I'm checking with Nitter and it's absolutely fantastic for this. Oh well, I guess I'll live without following those accounts.
yubblegumabout 2 hours ago
Nitter permitted perusing of twitter (x-cremente) without being tracked by whoever has the keys to the backdoors to twitter. This is why nitter is being killed - it destroys the surveillance capability provided by twitter/x/musk to interested parties.
skybrianabout 2 hours ago
Contrast with Bluesky, where the firehoses will give you an archive of everything, every post signed by the original account, for better or worse.
lrvick32 minutes ago
I have ignored many cease and desists from powerful entities, for years, with no problems. Call their bluff. They are almost always a baseless fear tactic.

If you guys are really going to stay down otherwise because you are worried, transfer ownership of the Nitter servers to me on paper and I will approve turning them back on and resume operations as usual.

I have zero problem telling Musk to fuck off. In court, if needed.

Advertisement
Artoooooorabout 3 hours ago
Remember, corporations may scrap you but you cannot scrap them.
nubinetworkabout 1 hour ago
I thought nitter shut down a year or two ago? I've been using xcancel, thinking they've been running on the old codebase...
VCFundedGenYerabout 2 hours ago
Move to the fediverse or die. Twitter has been irrelevant for nearly a decade now.
tofuahdudeabout 1 hour ago
Objectively untrue, unfortunately.
toleranceabout 3 hours ago
In the grand scheme of things I think that this is good.
ActorNightlyabout 3 hours ago
Its bad, but in the end nobody really cares that much about what is good or bad.
toleranceabout 3 hours ago
From a legal perspective, I can guess why you think it's bad. But aside from some legitimate use cases (apparently some towns and cities only issue announcements on X, really?) if you hate the platform itself so much but still feel compelled to check out content there then this may be a great opportunity for freedom and growth.
suddenlybananasabout 4 hours ago
It's hardly unique to Twitter but it's so frustrating how much "content" online requires an account. Whenever my friends send me something on Instagram or TikTok or a restaurant puts their menu on Instagram, I'm barraged with a thousand dark patterns forcing me to log in. Even Reddit is doing it now. I do wonder how much of this is to boost engagement versus another "wonderful" side effect from LLMs since they need training data.
jackb4040about 3 hours ago
The other day someone on here gave me a useful framing. Non-publicly accessible sites are the dark web. If a project told you they were moving all their docs and support to the dark web they would sound crazy, but if they say they're moving it to discord (the same thing) then it's fine.
itintheoryabout 2 hours ago
>the dark web

I prefer the older term "deep web" [1]. It's mentioned in Wikipedia that the terms are used as synonyms now, but I think it's important to differentiate between sites behind login/authentication/etc, and sites that are still openly accessible, albeit over Tor, i2p, etc.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_web

skinfaxiabout 3 hours ago
I think we will see the internet closed off more and more as AI usage grows.
duskwuffabout 4 hours ago
Twitter was doing stupid growth hacks, like requiring login to view replies, even before AI scrapers were a concern. (And I suspect many of the scrapers are just using logged-in accounts.)
dylan604about 3 hours ago
> before AI scrapers were a concern

didn't the scrapers scrape everything well before concerns were raised. were the concerns raised after the LLMs were released and then people realized what happened? so, forcing logins just closed the barn door after the horses got out.

kelvinjps10about 3 hours ago
libredirect is very good for these kinda of things. But the platforms keep trying to make it stop working so is a constant battle of the frontents to build workarounds
micromacrofootabout 3 hours ago
It's tracking and data harvesting, always is
int32_64about 1 hour ago
old reddit and nitter finished in the span of a month? What an incredible month to be undistracted.
metalcrowabout 3 hours ago
Anyone familiar with the legal reasons Twitter might be able to prevent sites like nitter from working? I believe scraping is legal but I'm sure there are details that make this different
zedeusabout 3 hours ago
From the letter(s):

> X has documentary evidence that you are scraping X Data, circumventing X’s API access controls and rate limits, accessing X using X accounts and session tokens in violation of X’s rules, and republishing X Data to the public. X’s Terms of Service, Developer Agreement, and Developer Policy strictly forbid such conduct. See https://x.com/en/tos (“[C]rawling or scraping the Services in any form . . . is expressly prohibited.”). By your own description, Nitter “uses Twitter’s unofficial API” and routes all requests through your servers, and requires operators to supply real X accounts to function.

> Your actions constitute a flagrant breach of the contractual and legal obligations you agreed to when accessing the X services. Your actions also violate various state and federal laws, including, but not limited to, the Texas Harmful Access by Computer Act (§ 143.001 and § 33.02) and the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125).

1284715about 3 hours ago
I wonder how xAI steals its AI training material! Of course no scraping is involved!1!!

They stole the Nitter code too of course without attribution. Does SpaceX really want to go into this?

metalcrowabout 3 hours ago
Ah, TOS violations. I believe those may not hold up in court well from the limited amount I recall in previous cases, but IANAL
fg137about 3 hours ago
Is this comparable to LinkedIn scraping?
hollow-moeabout 3 hours ago
That's a lot of unknowns, I doubt this text can actually hold in a court of law
orange999about 3 hours ago
A similar case Musk filed against an Israeli data scraping firm already got laughed out of court.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/musks-x-corp-loses-lawsuit-aga...

But I guess the nitter owner doesn't want to take any chances until he actually gets a court ruling in his favor.

zollaabout 3 hours ago
if i understand correctly, in Meta v. Bright Data, the court ruled that brightdata was allowed to scrape public profiles because the user is unauthenticated. thus I do not believe that precedent is in favor of nitter currently
refactorAbraxasabout 3 hours ago
It was only a matter of time before they got in the way of someone committing a crime under the pretense of power.
tyjenabout 3 hours ago
Explains why the various links were suggesting to use different instances today. Surprised it lasted this long.
paulnpaceabout 1 hour ago
Without a nitter instance, I simply won't see posts to X.

This seems predictable, so at least one goal is to reduce the reach of people posting on X.

Advertisement
Banditozabout 4 hours ago
A lot of instances are showing rate limited too.
dredmorbiusabout 3 hours ago
Note that the frequently-used workaround for regwalled Twitter content posted to G+, xcancel.com, is itself a Nitter instance.

HN mods may wish to take notice.

utopiahabout 3 hours ago
Sad for the project but unsurprising knowing how much SpaceX (sigh) relies on xAI which it mostly a shelf for a neocloud bootstrapped precisely from Twitter/X as a dataset. I imagine they will legally fight to close as much as possible in order to make it look like a valuable dataset that is exclusive.
numpad0about 4 hours ago
xcancel.com still works. Isn't that sus?
dawnerdabout 3 hours ago
xcancel worked even when nitter had problems before. I imagine they're running a fairly custom version of nitter now with their own workarounds.

Edit: I see it's not working either "Instance has been rate limited"

Barbingabout 3 hours ago
Might help that XCancel hotlinks media (pbs.twimg[.]com), should be a huge bandwidth reduction.
orange999about 3 hours ago
Right now, I can do about two searches on xcancel before it gives me the "instances have been rate limited" message. Then if I completely close out of my web browser, clear my web history from the last hour, and go back into my web browser, I can do another one or two searches, before xcancel again gives me that message about ""instances have been rate limited".

In theory I can still read the same things I could read before on xcancel by doing an endless cycle of doing one or two searches, then closing out of my web browser and clearing history, and then going back to xcancel and doing another search or two. But certainly that process is very annoying.

Now, I'm not 100% sure if this is related to Musk's cease and desist letter. I've run into this problem or similar technical problems about twice a month before when using XCancel. Usually the technical problem is resolved within 2 or 3 hours and I can use xcancel normally again. So I guess I'll check back in a few hours and see if I can use xcancel normally again.

Edit: Xcancel is working perfectly if you first go to somebody's X profile, and then you turn the x in the url to xcancel. For example, here is Elon Musk's profile on xcancel, where you can still view Elon's tweets, Elon's replies, and the replies that people have made to Elon's tweets.

https://xcancel.com/elonmusk/with_replies

XCancel still has a problem right now where I can only make a few searches on the xcancel website itself before it tells me I'm rate limited, and I have to sign out of the browser and sign back in before I can make searches on xcancel again.

However, I occasionally have had this problem on xcancel even before today. And I'd assume that this probably isn't related to the cease and desist letter. If this was due to the cease and desist letter, I'd assume that xcancel would be completely down right now rather than having limited functionality.

sillysaurusxabout 3 hours ago
Make it easy on yourself and just use Tor. Clearing everything is a matter of clicking on "new tor circuit for site".

Some sites throw annoying captchas your way though.

erulabsabout 3 hours ago
The open web is dead. The open web remains dead. And we have killed it.

I'm actually much less anti-Musk than the average HN commentator but it should be universally agreed here that a small handful of mega-corp websites dominating the majority of content on the web is a bad thing. Nitter was hardly a solution. Federated platforms like Mastodon and Bluesky are "culturally" closed, and "free speech" platforms like X are "technically" closed.

IMO we all need to start vibe coding PHP bulletin boards again. 'RETVRN' etc.

jrflowersabout 2 hours ago
> IMO we all need to start vibe coding PHP bulletin boards again. 'RETVRN' etc.

The most recent release of phpbb was 2 months ago

iamnothere27 minutes ago
And it’s still having critical security vulns after 26 years
jrflowers19 minutes ago
Can’t get a CVE if every anonymously generated slop forum is different
TiredOfLifeabout 1 hour ago
What does a site stealing content has to do with open web?
_ink_about 3 hours ago
They still work just fine, people need to use them instead of the drugs they get force fed by mega corps.
jackb4040about 3 hours ago
If we reflect on the debate from years ago about whether to nationalize Twitter, all the downsides we were warned about have come true. They censor / promote whoever the state wants anyways, the CEOs was literally in the cabinet for a time, but now they also have to enshittify and degrade the experience for the benefit of an also-ran AI lab.
aldeabout 3 hours ago
> Federated platforms like Mastodon and Bluesky are "culturally" closed

What does the even mean if you can host your own

gs17about 3 hours ago
Hosting your own doesn't really matter if it just means you're on a social network with one user.
dokyunabout 2 hours ago
Lots of people run single-user instances.
gdulliabout 3 hours ago
What does it even mean, period? MAGA losers are free to establish a community on Bluesky, the only difference between that and Twitter is that Bluesky isn't built to optimize for ragebait and culture war fighting. But they can still socialize among themselves on Bluesky even if no one else wants anything to do with them.
redeemanabout 2 hours ago
the problem here is, that a large large group of people do want something "to do with them" (and "them" not just being "maga losers"), but that for NORMAL users that sign up and use bluesky, there are others who choose that they must not socialize with them.

normal people dont understand how they can join specific communities or instances or whatever it is on the specific platform, they want something like "twitter" and then thats where they are, they dont want "some weird twitter instance thats not the main one"

dokyunabout 2 hours ago
Nothing, fedi is extremely anarchic by design. If you don't like a server you can move to a different one, or start your own. The big Mastodon servers put in a great deal of effort to police what their users can see and interact with (see FediBlock), but it's impossible to shut certain people or groups out of the network entirely. It's a double-edged sword, but it's a net good for the kind of network it was intended to be, which is a hacker's network; it wasn't designed for normies.
kgabout 3 hours ago
Maybe they're referring to defederation? It's quite common on Mastodon as I understand it, due to disagreements on things like moderation between server operators.
mmoossabout 3 hours ago
> "free speech" platforms like X are "technically" closed.

Musk boots off and/or limits distribution of people he disagrees with. I can't fathom how you think that's 'free speech' - it's the opposite.

> Federated platforms like Mastodon and Bluesky are "culturally" closed

I've heard that - what is your experience? Downvotes and exclusion? Are there more 'open' servers?

dokyunabout 2 hours ago
> I've heard that - what is your experience? Downvotes and exclusion? Are there more 'open' servers?

Fediverse has plenty of servers which are "free speech" adjacent, which most Mastodon servers close off since its easier for them to police what their users can see than let them do it themselves. The vast majority of them do not run the Mastodon software, and feel far more "wild west" with all the shitposters. But if you want to talk with actual hackers and are into that sort of thing, it's fun times.

Markoffabout 2 hours ago
seems all instances except xcancel.com stopped working

https://status.d420.de

I left Twitter few years ago as active user, it was not really giving me anything in return for contribution, I was still passively reading few accounts I followed through Nitter and used also Nitter redirect for all Twitter links in news articles.

If Musk thinks by shutting down Nitter instances I will return to Twitter he could not be further from truth, it doesn't really provide me anything essential I would not find elsewhere. It's almost as Google thinking I will ever pay for Youtube premium, if adblockers would stop working.

emsignabout 3 hours ago
As long as people are using X and linking to it this pain will just go on. If you have an account there you will not notice how unusable it is for others. And that's by design.
g-b-rabout 3 hours ago
This means that you need to stop posting links to it anywhere, unless you attach to the link everything you find interesting about it (so the discussion too, if it's interesting).

Doing otherwise should be banned here.

rifficabout 2 hours ago
as a former (and the best) mod of the Twitter subreddit and having a well attuned sense for how this will all play out it seems that X will very soon be a defunct service. We've all seen these patterns play out before.

this wikipedia page will be there for that day:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_defunct_social_network...

nixosbestosabout 3 hours ago
lol I'd say something about X, but man this place fooking loves X and it didn't go well last time. So, "oh nooooo".
12_throw_awayabout 1 hour ago
I think it's less that "this place" loves X, more that there is a committed segment of folks with flagging privileges that really really like a certain South African business guy.
Advertisement
teekertabout 3 hours ago
Now I have no more ways to read Twitter... So, good?
bluecalmabout 2 hours ago
X makes a platform available. People choose to post on it knowing full well how it works. X makes money by running ads, charging for subscriptions and tracking users.

To me it sounds reasonable that you can't just take that content and repost it without their or the author of the post explicit permission. It sounds like a fair use case and copying the whole content is not that.

Now there are technical details: "are they really copying or generating on the fly for the user" but I don't think it matters. At the end of the day the content belongs to either X or their users. I think arguments against that are arguments against copyright in general.

If I ever posted something on X my expectations would be that if people want to read it they need to obey X's terms and conditions. I wouldn't be happy if there was a platform copying it somewhere else. If I wanted my post to be public I would post on freely available public website (and then maybe repost or link it from my X's account).

orange999about 2 hours ago
You really are the owner of all the posts who make online. When you post on X, you grant X a license to display your posts, but you still have the copyright to your posts. Same thing if you post on Reddit or Facebook or YCombinator or whatever.

This really is an absurd case, but nitter apparently really wants to err on the side of caution until a judge rules in their favor.

QuantumNomad_42 minutes ago
> Same thing if you post on Reddit or Facebook or YCombinator or whatever.

Personally if anyone asked me, I’d happily let them take all comments I’ve ever posted to Reddit or HN and repost all of them on their own site.

In fact, I would like to declare the following right now: All comments I ever have made and ever will make on HN are available to use for anyone and everyone who wants to under the terms of the CC0 license. You can point to this comment if questions about copyright ever come up in relation to wanting to copy my comments from HN and rehost them elsewhere.

It’s just a shame that I am not a particularly famous or interesting person, and my comments are not all that interesting especially if taken out of the threads they are posted in without the surrounding comments from others in those threads.

In order for someone to be able to fully replicate all of the user content from a site such as X or HN or whatever, they would maybe need similar permission from every contributor in every thread if there wasn’t already a permissive license the site itself had gotten its users to agree to let their content be distributed under.

Even if you could somehow get permission from each and every user on a site that you could rehost their comments, it might or might not be doing something wrong to download all of the content from the original site itself unless there’s an ok from the site itself to do so.

Idk, IANAL.

spiderfarmerabout 4 hours ago
Let a thousand Nitters bloom.
shevy-javaabout 3 hours ago
This is sad. The government, in doing so, awards e. g. twitter/Musk a de-facto total control over the communication space. I think ALL protocols need to be made fully open, and everyone should be able to write clients adhering these protocols. Any "cease and desist" also must be instantly made public. Right now there is a rogue government running the USA, run by a corrupt orange clown king. All oligarchs who supported this system need to pay compensation money to the other taxpayers.
wrtashabout 2 hours ago
It is absolutely silly how many people here deny the importance of X for at least journalism and politics. Musk isn't the only one on X.

There is a reason these Nitter based gateways exist. If you want to change it, come up with a better alternative.

To the people who say there are only "right wing" figures. Really?

https://x.com/maxblumenthal

https://x.com/richimedhurst

https://x.com/ryangrim

https://x.com/aoc

If you only read Musk and AI boosters, you may get a wrong impression.

tamimioabout 4 hours ago
Reminder that hosting your own won’t last long either if it got popular, as long as you don’t control your domain, you are always under the mercy of being shutdown.
bbg2401about 4 hours ago
> You've gotta be kidding me. Unfortunately everyone still uses the Nazi app so this is actually a big problem.

If the commenter truly believes it’s a Nazi app, why are they the slightest bit upset to lose access to any version of it?

It’s astonishingly easy to not use toxic social media platforms.

gempirabout 3 hours ago
I can't even read specific public transport updates in my city because they only post those to Twitter, only vague messages on their own website.
robin_realaabout 3 hours ago
Have you thought about complaining to your public transport provider?
bbg2401about 3 hours ago
That’s a rather poor state of affairs but is surely an issue to take up with our local authorities. Is that their only communication channel? There’s no website, RSS feed or at least mirror feed on an alternative platform?

We should have prevented Twitter/X and other platforms becoming quasi-official communications channels for public institutions.

redeemanabout 2 hours ago
so that means your city is "literally hitler" and if you pay any kind of taxes that goes to your city, then so are you? :)

perhaps tone down the whole nazi shit. X is clearly not nazi, and neither is musk.

edit: and yes, I think its atrocious that they only post on X, they should be punished severely for that

MeetingsBrowserabout 4 hours ago
You answered your own question.

> Unfortunately everyone still uses the Nazi app

If your local town government for example only posts city updates to twitter, your options are to make a twitter account, use something like nitter, or miss out on updates.

seanw444about 3 hours ago
There's that, and the fact that the "town square" for my city ended up being a city citizens page on Facebook. So we've got the city government and the sheriff's office posting updates to X and/or Facebook, and anything coming from the residents can only really be seen on Facebook. I don't want an X or Facebook account. I guess I'm just supposed to remain in the dark if I don't submit to corpos. The merger of corporation and state is very real, and I guess it often arrives unintentionally rather than intentionally.
bbg2401about 3 hours ago
Is this the case where you are?

If so, that’s appalling.

MeetingsBrowserabout 3 hours ago
yes. Lots of smaller city governments are barely capable of running a functioning website.

Twitter used to be an easy and free way to distribute updates publicly. That has changed, but the inertia is still there and there isn't a good low friction alternative.

rererereferredabout 3 hours ago
I do not use Twitter but some people who do interesting things somehow still do and only post about them there. It's all so tiring.
bdangubicabout 4 hours ago
I would not say astonishingly as most people are full-on addicted to these platform and addictions are hard to kick, but definitely doable (9 years for me)
bbg2401about 3 hours ago
I suppose my bemusement comes from the fact that the commenter describes it in the most extreme terms (a nazi app!), and yet cannot kick the habit.
Narretzabout 3 hours ago
my guess is many people use nitter to do automatic scraping of Twitter for various projects, i.e. they can't believe they "have" to do it because so many people still use Twitter.
suddenlybananasabout 4 hours ago
You can want to read something someone else has posted without giving your data to the owner of Twitter.
bbg2401about 3 hours ago
So, it’s a nazi app that you can’t help but continue to read.

I don’t get it.

phoghedabout 3 hours ago
- it’s a nazi app

- some important non nazi information exists only on this app

- the nazi app is being harmed by nitter

Seems like using nitter would align with their worldview. Curious how you’ve failed to make this connection?

suddenlybananasabout 3 hours ago
Well, when heads of state, important ministers, politicians etc post things there, it's an unfortunate reality that you sometimes have to read it to stay in the loop. (I think Nazi app is a bit of an overstatement myself)
danielovichdkabout 3 hours ago
I am sitting down on Twitter with a leftist quitter... known to be alive.

Guitar solo

I am sitting down on LinkedIn with a former Kingpin, only fearing for his liiife.

Lalalalaaa

Sitting down at Facebook, watching for the craze hooks and starring just with fright.

Shaking at my head now, gotta go to bed now, my kids are actually alive...but down on tiktok they tell me how run my life.

Lalalalalaaa

Guitar solo exit