Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 625 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#plastic#plastics#conditions#book#show#maybe#thing#everywhere#yeasts#eat

Discussion (29 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

spockzabout 4 hours ago
Maybe the only thing more worrisome than microplastics everywhere is unstoppable plastics eating organisms everywhere, eating through all plastics everywhere.
ch4s3about 3 hours ago
Usually these bioengineered yeasts need pretty specific growth conditions in order to eat in this case ethylene glycol, not raw finished plastic. In this case they say "plastic-derived substrates" which means they're pre-processing the waste plastic.
cortesoftabout 3 hours ago
Good thing microorganisms are famous for their slow rate of change in dynamic environments…
ch4s3about 2 hours ago
I'm not sure what this adds. The yeast here is chomping ethylene glycol for carbon, and tons of soil bacteria can already do that. And I should add that highly specialized industrial/lab yeasts have existed for a long time and aren't prevalent in the environment, they just don't like to grow outside of narrow(ish) conditions. Highly prevalent wild yeasts tend to eat a variety of sugars, not glycol.
tantalor21 minutes ago
Of course, the lysine contingency.
ryanisnanabout 3 hours ago
Reminds me of the Taumoeba escaping the Xenonite enclosures.
fc417fc802about 3 hours ago
Perhaps soon you'll be needing to apply stains or sealants to your outdoor plastic items. Maybe even purchase treated plastic products that we worry leach toxic chemicals into their surroundings.
masklinnabout 2 hours ago
Timescale is the important bit. If organisms degrade plastics in a few hundred years then what plastics are uniquely valuable for will be quite fine indeed.
simmerupabout 2 hours ago
Why is that worrisome? Might give the fish a chance whose bellies are filling up with plastic rubbish
serfabout 2 hours ago
for all the reasons in the book/movie/television show 'The Andromeda Strain'.
piloto_ciegoabout 4 hours ago
There’s a fantastically silly but fun book about this the name of which eludes me.
stevekempabout 2 hours ago
Mutant 59: The Plastic Eaters, a 1971 British sci-fi environmental disaster novel written by medical scientist Kit Pedler and television screenwriter Gerry Davis.

No wikipedia page, but goodreads has it here:

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/99852816-mutant-59

piloto_ciegoabout 2 hours ago
That wasn’t it; I just found it, it’s called Ill Wind by Kevin J Anderson
mocheezeabout 3 hours ago
Not plastic, but 'Cats Cradle' by Kurt Vonnegut has something kind of like that.
righthandabout 2 hours ago
Such as in The Andromeda Strain?
weaksauceabout 2 hours ago
there was a time in history before fungus came along and ate trees so there were just a huge amount of trees around that couldn't decay. (which is why we have coal actually) this could be something akin to that.
mbilabout 4 hours ago
If you don't eat your biomass compound goo, you can't have any PlastiYum bacterial sludge
waschlabout 4 hours ago
Is there any of this ”bacteria converting plastic to fuel/food/neutral stuff“ actually applied anywhere at scale under economically reasonably conditions?
ninalanyonabout 4 hours ago
There was a Doomwatch episode on his subject with airliners falling out of the sky bcause all the plastic had been eaten away.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomwatch#Series_One

Jaauthorabout 3 hours ago
Didn't that happen in Andromeda Strain? The de-polymerized polymer?
stevekempabout 2 hours ago
And that episode was stretched out into a novel which I linked to above - https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/99852816-mutant-59
thisisauseridabout 3 hours ago
In 2011 researchers identified a fungus named pestalotiopsis microspora. It gained widespread attention because it can digest polyurethane plastic and survive entirely in anaerobic conditions, making it a prime candidate for deployment at the bottom of landfills.

I for one look forward to serving this underground deity.

metalmanabout 1 hour ago
soilent goo, again!

you, yes you, area "biomass compound", well maybe not quite yet, but soon, as these things go, but most definitly every last putrid smelly horrible thing is a "biomass compound", and when you add in plastic we are talking about most of the stuff found in millions of dumpsters, and most of the stuff actualy in dumps, or sewers.

This then solves the whole issue of what is allowed to go in which can or bin, which is anything you cant get money for or find someone who will hall it away for free.

I am very very sure that volunteers will soon show up wishing to "return to the great nutrient cycle"

but there is nothing to worry about as I am positive that everything will be tested and cynicly proven to be safe for human consumption

hktabout 3 hours ago
Honestly at this point I think the way to go may be to stop using plastics where they're not absolutely required, and to subsequently burn what goes into landfill while producing electricity and reclaiming heat. Better that than this.
fc417fc802about 3 hours ago
Burn it? With all the talk of carbon capture? Recall that plastic literally consists of a mass of hydrocarbons. Why not bury it?
axusabout 1 hour ago
I think the legitimate answer was groundwater contamination, but that should be solved for other things we bury. I'm on board for non-biodegradable plastic trash sequestration
Loughlaabout 1 hour ago
How do you define 'not absolutely required'?
itsrobreallyabout 4 hours ago
And here I thought we were going to be fed insects when we hit final-stage capitalism
Jaauthorabout 3 hours ago
you are ... plastic insects.