OpenAI have no mathematicians capable of understanding what they put out

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

tristanj•2 minutes ago

This post is out of date. OpenAI quietly updated the references on their paper earlier today and added several authors.

oefrha•11 minutes ago

Loosely related, you may want to check your own privacy settings at

https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/data#settings/DataC...

https://claude.ai/new#settings/data-privacy-controls

I just realized I've been happily "improving the model for everyone"...

japgolly•35 minutes ago

> our hypodissipative result (which is not public), but as I understand it part of their training data

How did it become part of their training data if it wasn't public? /confused

vessenes•22 minutes ago

This is speculation right now. The idea would be that if someone used the product and granted training rights, which is the default for many subscription levels, then some knowledge would have been imparted into the general weights of the new model.

oAI has made clear they did not specifically pull in any user data to context for this run.

WoodenChair•34 minutes ago

One of the researchers was using the product. They train on your private interactions unless you explicitly opt out in the settings.

OpenAI have no mathematicians capable of understanding what they put out

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews