Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

80% Positive

Analyzed from 307 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#more#successful#mutations#significant#changes#architectural#without#design#intelligent#animal

Discussion (34 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

red75prime•about 7 hours ago
Interesting. So, the human brain is the scaled-up monkey brain with significant architectural changes.
utopiah•about 6 hours ago
What was the alternative?
lukeify•about 2 hours ago
We didn’t have any. The project manager set it at 3 story points.
red75prime•about 6 hours ago
Scaling-up without significant architectural changes.
mapleoin•about 6 hours ago
Or significant architectural changes without scaling up.
curiousObject•about 3 hours ago
Evolution would design the alternative to be something slightly less capable than the minimum. /s

Really, the likelihood is that these mutations must have had an impact that far outweighs their space in the genome.

That’s how all our close competition got murdered by Homo Sapiens. Just significant difference in mental abilities.

samrus•about 7 hours ago
Implies intelligent design

I think its rather some mutations that produced more reelin and created the most successful animal in earth's history

Joker_vD•about 4 hours ago
I'd really rather liked it if that supposedly "intelligent" designer took a bit more time at designing the urogenital tract of human males.
lexicality•about 3 hours ago
I'd like it if the vagus nerve didn't do a loop around my neck for no particular reason. (Giraffes would probably like that even more)
codeulike•about 3 hours ago
mine seems ok what version are you on
hackrmn•about 3 hours ago
Hey, $DEITY did its absolute best with the constraints and the requirements. But hey, can't please everyone apparently. Be happy you can relieve yourself well past the intended warranty period. The parts were designed to be easily _aftermarket_ replaceable with sufficient advances in technology, retaining the fundamental design without changes.
shmeeed•about 4 hours ago
What's wrong with it?
incognito124•about 2 hours ago
I fail to see that, it's simply one of all other random mutations, it's just that this one has a big downstream effect of enabling other more complex mutations
Miraltar•about 6 hours ago
The most successful animal by what metric?
menno-dot-ai•about 6 hours ago
Tetris high scores, obviously
totomz•about 5 hours ago
Some of us don't spend days looking for food, don't die of cold, and survive the flu...

aaand we have Quake and Comand&Conquer - Red Alert

Nevermark•about 4 hours ago
The most successful at communicating their view that they are the most successful. Whether they are or not. But that means they are. By that metric.

Has another animal proposed they are more successful by a different metric?

Crickets?

woadwarrior01•about 4 hours ago
Merely implies a very good fitness function.
littlestymaar•about 3 hours ago
Yes. Though according this fitness function we're not necessarily more successful than a jellyfish or a tapeworm.
nurettin•about 2 hours ago
Intelligent mutations? How does that work?
borborigmus•about 7 hours ago
So Steely Dan documented this first?