Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

93% Positive

Analyzed from 1377 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#laser#light#wavelength#color#lasers#https#more#magenta#brown#org

Discussion (73 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

adzm•about 3 hours ago
Everyone talking about magenta and brown, but you can see an illusory color right now even without lasers! https://dynomight.net/colors/ behold, some kind of hyper-turquoise
junon•about 3 hours ago
For those not seeing it or only seeing a little, stare at it for a while then shake your head (or your phone) just a bit.
marzell•about 3 hours ago
Also there are other variants and tricks around this for other colors as well https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impossible_color
jjmarr•about 1 hour ago
I'm excited for new displays where instead of RGB primaries that can only show a triangular subset of possible colours, we have dynamic primaries that can combine to show almost any colour.
nabakin•about 2 hours ago
> When it comes to information transfer and processing, light can do things that electricity can’t. Photons — particles of light — are far zippier than electrons at working their way through circuits.

Electrons themselves don't move at the speed of light, but information transfer (i.e. communication) via electrons does happen close to the speed of light.

A subtle, but important, distinction that's often misunderstood and means computational performance gains would probably come from bandwidth, not latency.

mapt•about 4 hours ago
Is there a single person here interested in photonic computing that wants to explain to the class if there's any "there" there?
nine_k•about 3 hours ago
Immediately:

* You can pack many more different colors into fiber optic communication lines. Every color carries a few tens of GHz in modulation, but the carrier light is in hundreds of THz; there's a ton of bandwidth not used between readily available colors.

* You can likely do interesting molecular chemistry by precisely adjusting laser light to the energy levels of particular bonds / electrons.

* Maybe you can precisely target particular wavelengths / absorption bands for more efficient laser cutting and welding, if these adjustable lasers can be made high-power.

suzzer99•about 3 hours ago
* Concert lasers just got a lot cooler.
db48x•about 4 hours ago
It’s like any other fundamental research: you don’t know how much it’s worth until people start using it to solve real problems. This is something that is literally impossible to guess ahead of time. The most abstract mathematical techniques could turn into a trillion–dollar industry (number theory begat RSA encryption which now underpins _everything_ we do).

But I will say that precise control of laser wavelength is critical to today’s communication technologies. I doubt their new techniques will be useless.

topspin•about 3 hours ago
There is there there...

The substance is they've created a way to fabricate a device that can make the optical frequencies they wish. That is useful: it means a designer isn't limited to frequencies that are economic to generate with existing techniques, which is a constraint that lasers currently struggle with: low cost, compact, efficient laser sources (the kind that fit on a chip, and are fabricated by cost effective processes,) only exist for a limited number of frequencies.

The story is typical tech journalism pabulum, but the underlying paper does discuss efficiency. It's about what you'd expect: 35 mW -> 6 mW @ 485 nm, for example.

An obvious use case is multimode fiber communication: perhaps this makes it possible to use more frequencies for greater bandwidth and/or make the devices cheaper/smaller/more efficient. But there are other, more exotic things one might do when some optical frequency that was previously uneconomic becomes feasible to use at scale.

criticalfault•about 3 hours ago
I wonder if this could also work for (e)uv
2ndorderthought•about 3 hours ago
Depends on the cost. We already have variable wavelength lasers. We have had them for years. They are currently expensive, large, and not the easiest things to control electronically.

I have an application in mind for this technology outside of photonic computing. Again, it depends entirely on price, tunability, bandwidth of the profile, etc. My understanding of the photocomputing field is limited but I never thought the major issues were wavelength related? Maybe someone can educate me.

If anyone wants to send me one of these I would be pumped.

dado3212•about 3 hours ago
I think it's more relevant for quantum computing. The ions we choose for ion trap quantum computers are in part due to what wavelengths are excitable by modified telecom lasers, because they're the wavelengths that are easiest to produce and where the most research/stability/miniaturization has been focused. If the laser wavelength is configurable to this degree then it no longer becomes a constraint, and maybe you can choose single ions with different characteristics.
brcmthrowaway•about 4 hours ago
There's a lot of people here with esoteric knowledge of lasers, because they're generally incredible devices (along with masers). Someone should be able to comment.

I wish we had a large laser manufacturing ability in the West. I would say 95% of lasers of all kinds are manufactured in China.

xphos•about 1 hour ago
I don't know to much about photonics but if they ever figure out the boolean algebra and register storage it would be really cool. You have 1 photo cpu core but just use different wavelengths for different threads running in the core. I am sure its way more complex than that but articles like this make you dream about how much we don't know
spaqin•about 2 hours ago
That's most certainly good news (depending on the final cost) for ion trapping quantum computing - the wavelength of the laser they require to trap an ion depends on the molecule chosen, and most setups are expensive, finicky and difficult to calibrate, or sometimes messy if it's a dye laser.
packetlost•about 2 hours ago
Neutral atom too. You need fairly clean light to pump atoms into Rydberg states
chasil•about 1 hour ago
krenzo•about 1 hour ago
spacedoutman•about 2 hours ago
My first thought is this will be used as a weapon to bypass protections against specific wavelengths
jagged-chisel•about 2 hours ago
The "shrinking" circle: I did as asked and clicked the image to see the animation. I saw no shrinking. My eyes did fatigue and I saw the border between the red and green become a blurred gradient.

What should I have experienced?

deepsun•about 2 hours ago
State for longer. It starts shrinking only after a minute.
himata4113•about 2 hours ago
since the light range is so high, technically speaking as the technology improves does that mean we could end up sending petabytes a second over a single fiber optic core?
tbrownaw•about 2 hours ago
Visible light is a bit less than a petahertz, so no.
osamagirl69•about 1 hour ago
Would you care to explain how the NICT guys achieved 402Tb/s through a single (50km long!) fiber back in 2024 then? It seems like another factor of two would easily be in reach if they could extend their setup into the visible.
Advertisement
evo•about 2 hours ago
I wonder if this is a nuclear proliferation risk--could it be used for AVLIS/SILEX?
jcims•about 3 hours ago
Can each device vary the color or is it fixed based on how it’s built? Seems the latter?
2ndorderthought•about 2 hours ago
I believe you are right.
aftbit•about 4 hours ago
Cool, can I get a "proper" yellow diode laser from this? What's the efficiency look like?
deepsun•about 2 hours ago
Would I finally be able to see bright brown?
nine_k•about 2 hours ago
It's called orange. Much like bright gray is called white, and bright teal is called turquoise.
rafram•about 2 hours ago
Light brown is called tan. Dark and light oranges exist too and they’re not exactly the same as brown.
drivers99•23 minutes ago
See Technology Connections' video about Brown: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh4aWZRtTwU

He says brown is perceived when you see an orange-wavelength light that is significantly darker than its surroundings, providing the necessary context for your brain to interpret it as brown.

wizardforhire•about 1 hour ago
Just read the article and didn't see anything about building an actual laser… what details the article has (and its scant) its seems they took a fluorescing layer and sandwiched with a color wheel and added the additional wiring and control circuitry… (Obviously more nuanced and interesting physics but still…) cool and practical, but not a diode and definitely not a laser… I could be wrong and would love to be!

… now, if that setup could be drawn out into a fiber laser as cladding with a wide spectrum neural amplifying core (if such a material exists) that could maybe be something idk

cheschire•about 3 hours ago
Yes but can it do any color a mantis shrimp would like?

https://theoatmeal.com/comics/mantis_shrimp

Tade0•about 3 hours ago
The Mantis Shrimp most likely sees very much like us (or birds, snakes), it's just that its brain is too small to integrate signals from just three types of cones, so it evolved a whole rainbow of cones.
JumpCrisscross•about 3 hours ago
Huh. Anywhere you'd suggest I can read more about this?
__MatrixMan__•about 3 hours ago
I'll take one in gamma please.
Retro_Dev•about 3 hours ago
A gamma wavelength handheld laser would be cool; "and on this petri dish, we see a dot of cells instantaneously develop cancer"
lwansbrough•about 1 hour ago
0.1nm please. It's x-ray lithography time!
guzfip•about 3 hours ago
Very cool stuff. I regret wasting my life in software when I see other fields still doing interesting work.
analog8374•about 4 hours ago
can they do microwave?

if you do the exact right color you can make certain things melt very precisely.

Aboutplants•about 3 hours ago
An application that came to mind is tunneling (through rock and earth). You could absolutely tune the wavelength to whatever material your drilling through absorbs best, to help ease and speed. Would need a good amount of energy but I could see that utilized in some fashion in the next 10-20 years
BigTTYGothGF•about 3 hours ago
analog8374•about 3 hours ago
thanks, I'm familiar. But it doesn't answer my question.
Advertisement
jiveturkey•about 4 hours ago
But can it produce magenta?
ivanjermakov•about 3 hours ago
Not every color has a corresponding wavelength, rather a combination of wavelengths.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_vision

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIE_1931_color_space

dnnddidiej•about 3 hours ago
Magenta is the Doom of colour lasers by the look of it.
staplung•about 4 hours ago
What if I like magenta? Or brown?
zamadatix•about 4 hours ago
Pedantry for pedantry, you're in luck as the title says they created 'any wavelength lasers' not 'any wavelength laser' so you can make any such combos you like rather than the fixed set now (if true) :p.
dullcrisp•about 4 hours ago
Can I interest you in indigo or violet? Or a nice orange?
dnnddidiej•about 4 hours ago
Genuine q: how close can you get to magenta with the rainbow?
nine_k•about 3 hours ago
What we call "magenta" is the sensation of both red and blue color-sensitive cells in the eye being excited at the same time. There's no single wavelength that produces this effect (unlike e.g. yellow). The closes you can get is violet, which looks faint to the eye.

A rainbow gives you both red and blue; mute everything else, and you'll get magenta. That's what magenta pigments do when illuminated by white light (which is a rainbow scrambled).

compass_copium•about 3 hours ago
Not very! This is on the "line of purples".

Here's a nice visualization of color perception (there are more modern ones, but we used the 1931 color space when I was working in the field). The horseshoe shape on the outside is the single wavelength colors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIE_1931_color_space