Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

68% Positive

Analyzed from 1230 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#github#days#more#outages#https#downtime#uptime#weekends#didn#azure

Discussion (55 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

__natty__11 minutes ago
Contrast between official [0] and third party status pages [1] is huge. How their terms of service for SLA are legal if they are so different from real world usage of their product? I really like GitHub and their services but every time when it’s broken and their status page is green something screams inside me.

[0] https://www.githubstatus.com/ [1] https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/

sd9about 2 hours ago
Weekends are the untapped frontier. Still room to scale.
skorabout 1 hour ago
change is the biggest cause then?
sifex39 minutes ago
Or usage
kshahkshah25 minutes ago
Wait until they go 996!
jveabout 1 hour ago
A graph I have to question is even accurate.

> Across 170 days with at least one incident · worst day Thu, Nov 20, 2025 (1.1 days)

1.1 days total how is that possible? Scrolling over that day doesn't indicate the math behind the scenes - 1.3 hours single bullet point.

Also Nov 19 has a bullet point 1.3 day outage but total is 8.1 hours

hxtk43 minutes ago
The missing status page [1] treats it as downtime any time any component of the system is down, and calculates the overall uptime based on the time that doesn't overlap with any individual category outages, and the overall downtime as any time overlapping with at least one individual category outage to avoid double-counting They show 24h of minor outage on that date.

I'm guessing that this site is taking the downtime in a given day across all services and adding it up, which would mean the worst possible day has 10 days of downtime (a day of downtime for each major category).

1: https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/

thenewnewguy30 minutes ago
I see a bullet point for "1.0 days of 1.3 days", and when I mouse over the previous day (Wedensday 2025-11-19), I see "7.8 hours of 1.3 days".

I haven't actually checked any sources to confirm there really was downtime on those days, but if we assume those numbers are true 7.8 hours + 1 day is about 1.3 days.

keyleabout 1 hour ago
This is one of the most creative idea I've seen this year. Tasteful and clever. Bravo!
dvh18 minutes ago
I didn't know azure was this bad, completely changed my opinion on their cloud offerings
figmertabout 2 hours ago
Far fewer outages during the weekends. Perfect, wasn't gonna do any work then anyway.
elAhmoabout 1 hour ago
Funny to see this closely match contribution graphs with effectively no downtime on weekends.
debarshri44 minutes ago
Would be funny if you host it on github pages.
revolution88about 1 hour ago
For 30th of April, 2026 it shows it was down 1.0 days of 2.6 days (minor incident) :)
jpb0104about 1 hour ago
Setup my self-hosted Forgejo last night. Very pleased so far.
hosteurabout 1 hour ago
Yeah me too. I moved all my public projects to codeberg and my internal repos to self-hosted forgejo.

Hosting forgejo is really easy as well. It being a single binary makes it really easy to handle with almost zero maintenance.

danfritzabout 2 hours ago
I wonder how well this corolates with azure incidents. Especially for the US regions.
ngruhnabout 1 hour ago
I live in Europe. I've not noticed these constant outages. But I only use GitHub after work.
p2detarabout 1 hour ago
I also bet my money on Azure. Someone who allegedly worked there recently posted an article here on the numerous problems with Azure. Sadly I didn’t bookmark it.
hosteurabout 1 hour ago
The article you are thinking of was likely written by Axel Rietschin who worked on Azure core compute team.

https://isolveproblems.substack.com/p/how-microsoft-vaporize...

HN thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616242

chrisweekly23 minutes ago
Wow. Yikes. I never liked Azure, but this level of dysfunction is just astonishing.
Advertisement
korrectionalabout 1 hour ago
I don't really understand why this is happening at this scale, it's not like they just became broke and can't afford a proper server... can someone explain?
fareeshabout 1 hour ago
Agents are shipping code faster all over the world and in some cases 24 hours a day. Additionally, some significant number of non-developers are now developers i.e. they are also shipping to github regularly.

This is not limited to just pushing code but all the bells and whistles that github added as features under the assumption of some predictable growth are now exceeding the original plans.

I suspect a lot of their existing systems have to be re-architected for unanticipated scale, and it won't happen overnight for sure.

prependabout 1 hour ago
They were sucking 5 years ago before agents existed. I don’t think this has anything to do with recent changes.

https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/

Octoth0rpeabout 1 hour ago
Pretty damning. Would also be interesting to see the number of commits overlayed. The graph tells a great story about the correlation with MS's takeover, but I wonder if at the same time that uptime went to shit, MS was shifting over large numbers of enterprise contracts to github. That would be a more complete story IMO.

None of which excuses this. Can you imagine someone's reaction in 2017 if you told them that github would be below 90% uptime in 2026? It would be unimaginable.

sarchertech22 minutes ago
That’s nonsense. GitHub didn’t have 100% uptime before 2020. I remember downtime back then. And Microsoft didn’t make changes that fast. The only thing that changed is the accuracy of their status page.

Also go back and look at the unofficial status page from 3 years ago. It’s regularly above 99% and has been dropping steadily since then. Then in the last 3 months has dropped to below 85%.

p-e-wabout 1 hour ago
Whoa, if that is even remotely accurate then the talk about agents is a complete red herring.
baqabout 1 hour ago
They’re on track to 30x volume yoy by their own words
plufzabout 1 hour ago
See previous days articles. Agentic coding. Going from 1b annual commits to estimated 14b or more from one year to another.
embedding-shapeabout 1 hour ago
The faster you move, the more you screw up, almost no company producing software have figured out how to move fast and not screw up. It's so hard, that companies even used to boast about how much they didn't care about screwing up, as long as they moved fast.

Add in new "productivity" tools that help you move even faster, with even less regards for how much you screw up (even though the tool could be used for you to move at the same speed, but with less screw ups), and an engineering culture which boils down to "Why not?", and you get platforms run by Microsoft that are unable to achieve two nines of reliability.

prependabout 1 hour ago
I suspect it’s caused because Microsoft is using buggy Microsoft tech instead of the original stack.

They’re making political decisions based on what they sell vs what’s actually useful for their use case.

It’s kind of impossible to find out if this is true though.

u_fucking_dork9 minutes ago
That doesn’t track because GitHub Enterprise Cloud has great uptime. This is all load based, vibe coded ai slop code shipped at record numbers from users who will never convert to paid. The real question is what are they doing about that?
dicksentabout 1 hour ago
ai
FaithMB27 minutes ago
I like this more than I expected. The intensity gradient is a nice touch too.
bharxhavabout 2 hours ago
Would be interesting to see if this correlated with their release cycles.
hosteurabout 2 hours ago
Well, outages seem to be distributed across all days except weekends. So this seems like people fucking around with stuff being a major factor.
samlinnferabout 1 hour ago
Surely it just means more people working, resulting in more load, resulting in more outages?
pwaglandabout 1 hour ago
Or even both. In any kind of continuous deployment, you'd expect outages at the point of deployment, or shortly thereafter as the unintended consequences ripple.

Then the load during the working days makes those ripples larger and into outages.

embedding-shapeabout 1 hour ago
Most outages are caused by changes by humans ("actors"?), very rarely are things "People just dig our stuff so much we can't keep up" but more often "We didn't think about this performance drawback when we built thing X, now it's hurting us", and of course, more outages when you try to fix those issues without fully considering the scope and impact.
pardsabout 1 hour ago
This design is perfect irony. I love it.
lnenadabout 2 hours ago
The memes are really painful now. I feel for the team that's is trying to survive underwater.
renegade-otterabout 1 hour ago
With management screaming down their necks:

YOU NEED TO USE MOAR AI!

Gigacoreabout 1 hour ago
It is funny how weekends are almost always up!
faangguyindiaabout 1 hour ago
All these companies brag about being hyperscalers and cannot scale github.

Similarly, i see google releasing advancement after advancement in LLM yet i see antigravity sub where people are crying all time.

cyanydeezabout 2 hours ago
double entendre: Is it load based or github-employee based that weekends are sparser.

or just a multifactor of both.

globular-toastabout 2 hours ago
Didn't they blame "AI" for the increased load? I'm not sure why AI usage would be more during the week than the weekend, but it could be.

It does look like Friday outages were a bit rarer, which could be due to having a "no deployments on Friday" rule.

mirekrusinabout 1 hour ago
From the chart it seems they should have policy to deploy on weekends only.
Shoetpabout 2 hours ago
Yes
WesSouzaabout 1 hour ago
Well done.
airstrikeabout 1 hour ago
can you correlate this to data on # of commits, actions, etc?
Advertisement
ramon156about 1 hour ago
Please tell me this makes sense

This website has no overused ai-generated animations and... I quite enjoy it. The original website[1] has a fade-in animation, big round cards, shadows, all the jazz you can think of, it's there.

This site is very readable, very honest and sober. I don't need to sift through buzzwords to figure out tiny details.

Thank you, OP!

1: https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/

philprxabout 2 hours ago
"Good job, Microsoft, amazing uptime."
rvzabout 1 hour ago
Another reminder that a self hosted git repository would have more uptime than GitHub and centralizing everything to GitHub was a very bad idea. [0]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22867803

Fokamulabout 1 hour ago
Clearly their team needs more LLM usage.