Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

57% Positive

Analyzed from 912 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#war#usa#regime#crime#crimes#should#here#every#human#rights

Discussion (35 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

mugiseyebrowsabout 3 hours ago
It's called war crime only if you lost
ryandvmabout 3 hours ago
“It says here in this history book that luckily, the good guys have won every single time. What are the odds?” -Norm MacDonald
toxicunderGroovabout 2 hours ago
And it's only called pedophilia if convicted
misanoabout 2 hours ago
It might sound strange, but the solution to war crimes is arguably total victory over the enemy—something like the situation in Venezuela, which is considered a total victory. The human rights abuses committed by the Islamic Republic regime have caused the issues referred to in the article as ‘war crimes’ to appear diminished and insignificant in comparison.
jst1fthsdys40 minutes ago
> The human rights abuses committed by the Islamic Republic regime

What about the human rights abuses by the democratic regime of ISUS? Do we deserve some war crimes too?

dataflowabout 2 hours ago
Why in the world is this flagged?
nickvecabout 1 hour ago
Just guessing, but I assume because it’s arguably off-topic as defined by the HN guidelines. I don’t think it should be flagged, though.

“Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.”

OutOfHereabout 3 hours ago
If I am not mistaken, it is not a war crime as per the Geneva Convention. It could be a war crime under Additional Protocol I (1977) or the Rome Statute (1998) but the US hasn't ratified these. It clearly is a last choice reaction by the US, and it's better than the alternative of carpet bombing.

Tell me, why is it legal for Iran to bomb oil tankers of other countries?

wak90about 1 hour ago
Do you not see the difference between controlling territorial waters and bombing civilian water infrastructure
OutOfHere11 minutes ago
Huh. It is not entirely in Iran's territorial water. It is partially in Oman's water. Iran is attempting to control what does not belong to it.

Moreover, under the law of the sea, the Strait of Hormuz is as an international strait. [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_strait

spiderfarmerabout 3 hours ago
This thread will get flagged and disappear, probably because at least someone in HN leadership realises just how bad this reflects on the USA and its people.

But people in the USA should realise this:

An entire generation is growing up now, who hate, dislike or at least distrust the USA.

Where I have the feeling the US will come to its senses, eventually, hopefully; my children tell me that they and all their classmates see no difference between China, Russia, USA or Israel. None of these countries seem particularly trustworthy to them.

At the "Model United Nations" my oldest, who had to represent the United States realistically was surprised to learn just how immensely hypocritical, self-serving, arrogant and sometimes just plain evil the viewpoints of the USA are. And have been, for his entire life now.

That's the generation that has to do business with the USA in 10-20 years time.

Buckle up.

dana-sabout 3 hours ago
You were correct, it got flagged. Personally I held the belief that people shat too much on the USA, then the current regime started and I feel a fool.
paleotropeabout 3 hours ago
"An entire generation is growing up now, who hate, dislike or at least distrust the USA."

Same as it always was.

orwinabout 2 hours ago
I guarantee you it isn't the same. Even anti-atlantists here were more 'we should imitate them' than 'we should fight against their culture'. Nowadays even my very Catholic, very right wing, very pro-Bush/Irak war family is quite cross with the US.
cmxch43 minutes ago
Rome (US) will always have its critics.

It’s our job to make sure they don’t have any power.

blitzarabout 3 hours ago
"Now" is doing a metric ton of heavy lifting in that headline.
boothbyabout 3 hours ago
There are degrees to these things. A nation's leader repeatedly and explicitly declaring intent to commit genocide is makes that "lift" an extremely light one.
newscluesabout 3 hours ago
Remember when America firebombed civilians during World War Two?
jst1fthsdys36 minutes ago
Quick question, who were the aggressors in that war? What had they done previously that might have warranted it?
hawkice34 minutes ago
The aggressors not being the targets of the firebombing is central to the concerns here. They weren't military targets (largely).
pjc50about 3 hours ago
That was, sadly, very much an "everybody does this" thing, from Guernica to Chongqing to Coventry.

But yes, there are two possible lessons from those horrors:

- never again must this happen to anyone: the construction of international peace frameworks, the ICC, and human rights law

- what is currently happening, which is very different

JumpCrisscrossabout 3 hours ago
Wasn’t regret for and fear of the scale of that damage partly why we supported the Geneva Convention?
blitzarabout 3 hours ago
Unfortunately that knowledge seems to have been lost with the passage of time.
acqqabout 3 hours ago
Ever heard about Laos?

"Between December of 1964 and March of 1973, the US launched more than 270 million cluster bombs on Laos during Operation Barrel Roll. This number is equivalent to dropping a full plane cargo load every 8 minutes, 24 hours a day, for 9 years. Laos is thus the most heavily bombed country in the world."

"The legacy of this once secret war continues today. More than 80,000,000 undetonated bombs are strewn across the country threatening the lives of its people."

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/laos-the-most-heavily-bo...

"Since the end of the operation in 1973, over 20,000 people have died or been injured by these remaining bombs. At any moment, a farmer may strike one while plowing or a child may find one while playing. (...) Estimates suggest that as many as 100 civilians fall victim every year"

josefritzishereabout 3 hours ago
The US certainly has a mixed track record here. But the culture of lawlessness in this administration is hard to overstate. Every crime committed by this regime is followed by a "what about" argument from a pundit, citing an example where someone in time, committed a vaguely similar offense. But no regime in US history did so many crimes so often. This is historically corrupt and criminal; everything else is disingenuous false equivalency.
avaerabout 3 hours ago
For anyone who hasn't, I recommend reading up on Watergate and watching the resignation speech.

It represents the kind of presidential conduct that a few decades ago was considered so abhorrent that the president should immediately resign over it.

rtkweabout 3 hours ago
Well initially Nixon was following a similar playbook to what you see Trump et al pull off successfully today. He only resigned when it became clear the he had lost too many votes in the Senate and would lose the impeachment vote. That took a few months from when the story initially broke.
soraminazukiabout 2 hours ago
> But no regime in US history did so many crimes so often.

Native Americans would beg to differ, as would formerly enslaved people. Both historical injustices and the ongoing suffering of people abroad unfortunately feel distant to many, so the cruelty becomes abstract, and to some, unreal.

Markoffabout 3 hours ago
Now? There is reason why United States is not a member of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

It's their policy for decades. There is no bigger threat for world peace than US (and maybe Israel).

spiderfarmerabout 3 hours ago
Not maybe. Israel is the whole reason the USA is losing its mind (and its war) in Iran right now.