Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

25% Positive

Analyzed from 167 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#machining#fanuc#machines#old#modern#sinumeric#user#instead#code#enough

Discussion (4 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Vedor•about 3 hours ago
It beings back memories, I was learning CNC machining mainly on Fanuc machines. They were old, reliable, but ultimately quiete crude machines. When for the first time I was working on a modern Sinumeric milling machine, I was amazed how user-friendly it was. Instead of writing g-code by hand, user could just use a menu to choose operation to perform, like machining an island or a pocket. You could say that Fanuc felt like C, and Sinumeric like Python. Well, not 1:1, but close enough for analogy.

The article though, it's an interesting read, but I hoped for more technical details. It ends abruptly too, so I hope for a continuation.

chiffre01•about 2 hours ago
Another problem with these old controls is even when code is sent over serial, they are slow. Think like less than 9600 baud.

They also don't have the computing power to do adaptive or other modern tool paths.

echoangle•about 1 hour ago
Is 9600 baud a real problem realistically? That’s still at least 10 gcode commands per second, right?

If your CAM software is smart enough to use arc commands instead of using line segments, I don’t really see a tool path where you would need more than that.

chiffre01•29 minutes ago
Depends on how complex the part is. I've seen adaptive toolpath posts get 1,000s of lines long.