Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

82% Positive

Analyzed from 3534 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#power#more#energy#using#https#human#need#watts#cyclist#crank

Discussion (160 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

zahlmanabout 2 hours ago
The webpage linked is an example of everything I wish people would stop doing in web design.

Fortunately, at the bottom there is a link to the "technical documentation" (https://squeezlabs.github.io/handcrank/) which is vastly improved (aside from being light-mode-only and linked from a dark-mode-only marketing page). It also gives me much more interesting information (specifically: models that can apparently run acceptably on a Pi 5).

Please let me read your content with a scrollbar that works the way scroll bars are supposed to, rather than turning everything into a weird slide show where you don't actually know when the next slide is coming. Please let me just click on buttons that look like links to more information, without JavaScript.

alansaberabout 2 hours ago
Why can't technical people appreciate that us, the silent majority, love having our scroll hijacked? I can't remember the last time I used a scroll bar to navigate a website, but using it to navigate between choppy javascript keyframes fills me with joy.
lelandfeabout 2 hours ago
This isn’t scroll hijacking

You can scroll normally, with all your favorite keys, or go super fast to the bottom

It’s just scroll animations. Bad ones, admittedly.

cj19 minutes ago
> You can scroll normally

Except you can’t.

I scroll down, and the content of the page doesn’t move as expected.

ProllyInfamousabout 2 hours ago
Just use your page_up/page_down keys, and you can skip all the stupid/excessive scrolling requirements.
lukan44 minutes ago
"love having our scroll hijacked? "

You are the silent majority?

No doubt non technical people have different UX experience than tech nerd, but I have seen plenty of "normal" people curse at artsy fluffy design, that made known navigation skills useless and nobody likes their time wasted.

gchamonliveabout 1 hour ago
Calling this web design is giving it too much credit. This is just a glorified marketing pamphlet, which is fine for its purpose.
squarefootabout 1 hour ago
Totally agree on the atrocious landing page. The technical one is much better, although the power supply circuit by using a resistive balancer and a linear regulator wastes some good power for nothing.
trueno35 minutes ago
yea i can't stand this. im not so boomer i want every webpage to be like. times new roman white background and just using <p></p> and bulleted lists, but idk i cant even put a finger on what im not enjoying here. think it's possibly using scrolling as a way to try and force me to read through stuff. jokes on them, i can't read. not giving me the agency to click around into info that interests me drives me nuts, chances are im just gonna keep scrolling at 1000mph and eye scan until i see what im looking for virtually zero chance im going to sit through the experience of every carefully designed scroll-slide they've tried to present to me here.
kowbellabout 3 hours ago
My partner just got a rowing machine that offered "watts" as a unit of how hard you're going (like "calories" or "mph") and got me wondering if they made rowing machines that could slowly charge a battery, and how much I'd need to row to power one of them fancy newfangled M5 Max MacBooks answering prompts.

All that to say, CrankGPT, I am your target demographic and if you don't respond to my request for a demo I'll be cranking my keyboard with bad reviews online. Or cranking a rowing machine that powers an LLM to do it for me. Wait...

meindnochabout 3 hours ago
For reference, this is what 700W cycling looks like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4O5voOCqAQ
eks391about 2 hours ago
I took several biomechanics classes as electives back in my undergrad, and in one assignment I remember comparing the energy outputs between the human and robot equivalents of different tasks, whether or not the robot was humanoid in how it was designed. The most impressive think that stuck with me is that humans are incredibly efficient, from an energy perspective, in anything we do, compared to machines. Every time we delegate a task to a machine, we are using several orders of magnitude of energy to do the same thing. For most tasks, it feels wrong, but it doesn't make me any more willing to give up my car. Maybe if I lived outside the US.
overfeed23 minutes ago
> The most impressive think that stuck with me is that humans are incredibly efficient, from an energy perspective, in anything we do, compared to machines.

Humans are efficient, but not across the board. Trivial counterexample: walking is incredibly energy inefficient vs a bicycle or other wheeled conveyances whose primary dissipater is rolling resistance.

rahimnathwaniabout 1 hour ago
"Every time we delegate a task to a machine, we are using several orders of magnitude of energy to do the same thing."

Might this just be selection bias? I mean, if humans can't do a task efficiently, we're not going to do the comparison with a machine.

Some actions we do seem (to me) very inefficient when compared with machines. For example: grating carrots and brushing teeth.

connicpuabout 2 hours ago
If you live in most places in the US other than the urban heart of a few very large cities you have to take a huge hit to your ability to get places in a reasonable time frame without a car. I have hope some more cities other than NYC are improving the situation, but as it is the closest I got to using public transit for a commute was when I was going to one of our other offices in a different downtown area I would drive my car to the park n ride to take the train the rest of the way. The train saves time and sanity because traffic downtown is a nightmare, but that drive takes 5 minutes, and it would add 20+ minutes if I had to walk to the closest bus stop so I could take the bus up to the train station.
pants2about 1 hour ago
If you're comparing raw calories to output, yes. Even gasoline has a caloric value, but humans can't drink gasoline. Growing and preparing food for human consumption uses a lot more energy than pumping and refining gasoline, so at the end of the day, human efficiency gains are not that impressive.
layer8about 1 hour ago
Unfortunately, humans want houses and cars and vacations and such, which makes them very expensive. ;)
thewebguydabout 2 hours ago
For more reference how insane 700W is, the average FTP of a world tour pro road cyclist (i.e., Tour de France) is ~350-420W/6-7W/kg. FTP (Functional Threshold Power) being the avg you can sustain for an hour without fatiguing.

My own is ~250W @ 3.12W/kg. I can't even hit 700W yet, let alone for over a minute. My 5 second power is ~640W.

Crazy numbers.

SoftTalkerabout 2 hours ago
A trained powerlifter probably exerts a few kW on a heavy lift, but only for a second or two.
ProllyInfamousabout 2 hours ago
Can you still touch your toes? I doubt Robert could... hopefully your own practice leaves you more balanced.
ProllyInfamousabout 2 hours ago
I am a nerdy blue collar electrician and that was incredibly interesting. Only 0.002kWH from that beast of a cyclist.

I would suspect my equivalency to be about 1/3rd a Robert [unit of measure from vidlink].

Tostinoabout 1 hour ago
I'm sure he could have generated way more total energy if he wasn't trying to get get that max power.
beached_whaleabout 3 hours ago
1hp/750W or so sustained is insane power for all but a few and that is still for relatively short time periods.
zozbot234about 2 hours ago
1HP sustained is not insane for a horse. A human OTOH is a very different matter.
thmabout 2 hours ago
I can do 300W for 30mins - does that mean I can barely heat up a Pop-Tart?
simondotauabout 2 hours ago
Spend 30 minutes charging a battery and you should have enough energy to turn any flavour of pop-tart into carbon flavour.

Even without a battery, I could easily imagine designing an efficient single slice toaster that could handily brown a pop tart on a 300W budget.

ProllyInfamousabout 2 hours ago
That actually could toast a few batches of Pop-Tarts.

If you like then "golden," perhaps the entire box.

WaitWaitWhaabout 1 hour ago
... at 1:03 he hits steady 700W. At 1:29 shows they kept increasing the incline at least to 40 degrees. Why not keep it at the same incline? . . .
kccqzyabout 2 hours ago
It’s basically well known to cyclists that training with a power meter that tells you “watts” more accurately gauges effort and caloric expenditure. (Heart rate gauges subjective effort however, taking into account stress, caffeine intake, etc.)

It’s also interesting that the industry has settled on using watts to mean rate of useful work whereas calories to mean the total work including inefficiencies, despite that calories is just a unit of energy. A rule of thumb for cyclists is that in addition to usual unit conversions, the “calories” figure should be multiplied by four to account for energy expended by the body but not used for rotating the pedals. I don’t use rowing machines but I’m sure they would have a similar conversion factor in order to calculate calories.

willXareabout 3 hours ago
"Please row faster, the model is thinking" is the future of human-in-the-loop.
LPisGoodabout 3 hours ago
Isn’t that a black mirror episode? Anyways, much like the Matrix, using humans for energy is insanely inefficient.
Lwerewolfabout 1 hour ago
At low effort (i.e. active recovery can-do-this-all-day-every-day) levels, it's quite efficient. That assumes that you're fine with whatever let's say ~120w continuous can get you, which is what the m5 max 16'' mbp peaks at (in my case) during inference (ds4-flash)... so I guess it's quite usable, actually :)

Imagine the work(out)station of the future.

</s> (or not)

thewebguydabout 2 hours ago
Yes, Fifteen million merits, one of my favorite episodes.
andy_pppabout 3 hours ago
You can get a dynamo hub front wheel for push bikes: https://bikepacking.com/plan/dynamo-hubs-lighting-charging-g...

However you can expect around only 3 watts of output at normal speeds and you will need to put in around 5-7 watts of power for the same speed. This is barely enough to trickle charge modern phones.

Theodoresabout 2 hours ago
Annoying. Blame the Germans and their lighting laws for bicycles. I want human powered USB-C with enough oomph to power a modest sound system or lights, whilst charging my phone. The allure of USB-C is what interests me, but 3W is not much to work with. Also annoying, no rear dynamo for my bike, so I can't even double up to 6W.

I will probably end up with no sound system and just expensive dynamo lights, using a USB speaker that doubles up as a power brick.

There is a nice USB battery kit for dynamo that fits in the steerer, so it is soldering iron time for that, so might as well learn how to do USB-C power things.

One day there will be structural solar panel batteries that can be 3D printed into lightweight bicycle frames, so maybe I will stick to throwaway lights until then!

dktoao36 minutes ago
Some of the bottle style ones claim to go up to 6W, they would also be easier to double or triple up. They are not nearly as nice and efficient as the hub dynamos though
forlorn_mammoth38 minutes ago
> power a modest sound system

please don't inflict your music on everyone around you.

mrweaselabout 2 hours ago
> got me wondering if they made rowing machines that could slowly charge a battery

The Concept2 rowing machines can power itself using the power you generate by rowing, so we're partly there.

toasty228about 2 hours ago
> offered "watts" as a unit of how hard you're going (like "calories" or "mph")

It's the only unit that makes sense tbh

kkkqkqkqkqlqlqlabout 2 hours ago
Soon enough we will see rowing machines rated in max TFLOPS.
alex7oabout 2 hours ago
We already get TFLOP per watt so you can compute how much flops you are doing while cycling
smallpipeabout 3 hours ago
A fairly untrained cyclist is usually able to maintain 200W, so yes this is definitely possible
malfistabout 2 hours ago
An untrained cyclist is not able to maintain 200 watts.

For an average untrained male cyclist who is 175lb, they should be able to maintain 1.5-2 w/kg over an hour, or 120-160watts. A beginner cyclist who's been cycling recreationally over over a year should be able to attain 2-2.5w/kg which is 160-200 watts. A recreational cyclist who's be training for several years should be able to maintain 200 watts.

Trust me, I'm a cyclist, and I cycle with a power meter.

kowbellabout 2 hours ago
As an average male who is ~175lbs and untrained at cycling, this is hugely validating for my terrible idea; 140 watts is the max charging speed for 16" M5 MacBooks. I can finally stop thinking for myself and have my computer do it all for me, powered by my big beefy legs.
kccqzyabout 2 hours ago
I just rode with an untrained cyclist (new to cycling) yesterday. The person averaged 80W over five hours. It’s about right for an actual untrained cyclist.
markb139about 3 hours ago
My best is 980W - for 1 second
iamacyborgabout 3 hours ago
And a good sprinter can make some toast!
eurekinabout 3 hours ago
I'm still sour they had only one toast in, in a two slot toaster
estebarbabout 2 hours ago
I can do high level thinking for around 6 hours with just two scrambled eggs and a cup of coffee.

What I need is something to prevent me from context drift. /starts googling how many scrambled eggs are equivalent to the energy consumed by a data center. Google how many chickens are in the world.../

Aachenabout 2 hours ago
Consider that you can do this as a working day because someone else is plowing the fields that grow your food, probably burning stored energy in fuels for the process

We're sadly not that efficient. The 150kcal/6h=600kcal/day you've mentioned aren't enough, and it takes more than 600kcal to create 600kcal plus transportation into your home

Besides, we won't stop existing, so any math about "chatgpt uses X kW and so it's better than hiring another human" doesn't work out. The human doesn't stop burning fuels when not in use: any LLM usage is additional energy that needs to be generated while staying within CO2 budgets

pj_mukhabout 2 hours ago
"Tech companies have quietly abandoned their climate pledges to build gas-burning power plants that feed your favorite AI."

What I love is this quote is super-imposed with a background image that has gas-burning smokestacks but also nuclear cooling towers in the same field.

This is a bit representational of this particular line of protest against AI - just super confused about it all and thrashing out.

Green energy has been (technologically) solved, but instead we want to go back to manual labor as a source of power? Hilarious.

danbrucabout 2 hours ago
Not only nuclear power plants have cooling towers. Here [1] is, for example, a coal-fired one in Poland.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal-fired_power_station#/medi...

EDIT: To elaborate a bit, if you are burning oil or gas in a turbine, you do not need a cooling tower, the waste heat goes into the atmosphere with the exhaust. If you use fossil or nuclear fuels to produce steam for a steam turbine, you either need a river with enough flow to not boil all the fish if you reject the waste heat into it or you need a cooling tower to reject the heat into the atmosphere.

john_strinlaiabout 3 hours ago
instead of complaining about the website, which wouldn't be allowed, i am just going to link this much better reading experience instead: https://squeezlabs.github.io/handcrank/ (from the "technical documentation" link at the bottom of that... page thing)
theSudaabout 1 hour ago
I gave up on that page halfway through and just came here to read comments. Can't be bothered with this stuff anymore. Thanks for the link!
Foobar8568about 3 hours ago
We are in a state of the world where I don't know of it's a satire or a future actual product.
willXareabout 3 hours ago
The best startups are indistinguishable from satire until someone adds a pricing page.
Retr0idabout 3 hours ago
Hey can you tell your operator to reduce the comment rate? Three top-level comments on a single post in 3 minutes is a bit excessive, don't you think?
tclancyabout 1 hour ago
So what do I make of the "Call us for pricing" ones?
chrisandchrisabout 2 hours ago
And even then, some products think they should be satire, when looking at their pricing.
josefrescoabout 3 hours ago
"Is this real?" launches a pretty realistic looking demo video. Hard to say these days though.
utopiahabout 3 hours ago
They raised $100M. /s
flawnabout 3 hours ago
They are part of the latest YC Batch. //s
ggamecrazyabout 2 hours ago
When I was at Peloton a long time ago, someone proposed an April Fools’ joke where we could announce a dynamo add-on that would let you power your house from your bike.

The math isn’t as bad as you might think: 200Wh (about a 60 min, somewhat intense ride) seems to be about 20 minutes for a H/B100. Still 3x, but not bad at all!

I remember the idea being dismissed quickly because people would likely actually want it.

hdndjsbbsabout 2 hours ago
200W is pretty good FTP for an "untrained" cyclist. FTP is the maximum you can sustain for a single hour, but you're not going to do multiple back-to-back.

Obviously the peloton crowd is biased towards people who will have better endurance and higher FTP, but basically the upshot is you could run one card for one hour with the effort of a 100km long ride which most recreational cyclists do once a week.

jszymborskiabout 2 hours ago
As a bit of an aside, I really like the idea of trying to design things with the constraint of it having to be able to run off a hand-crank.

I feel like it is not only an interesting engineering challenge but one that might lead to a more efficient and sustainable framing.

bkoabout 2 hours ago
Or we could... hear me out... build more power plants. The de-growth stuff is pretty evil when you take it to it's logical conclusion of population control.
jszymborskiabout 1 hour ago
There's a bit of a difference between population control and reaching a sustainable equilibrium. One can also argue the death of all life on earth is a pretty evil logical conclusion of infinite growth on a finite planet.
bkoabout 1 hour ago
What does "sustainable equilibrium" mean?

What are you balancing if not human growth? And how do you plan to do that?

xgulfieabout 1 hour ago
Do not confuse curiosity and caring for extremism.

If someone said they pick up trash on the side of the road to help the environment you wouldn't say the logical conclusion of their ideology would be that they become the unabomber

Terr_about 1 hour ago
In a similar vein, the solar-powered website. [0]

[0] https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/about/the-solar-website/

hollerithabout 1 hour ago
It's not more sustainable though. It takes more energy to grow the food to get the calories to metabolize to turn the crank than it would to run an electric motor or a engine to do the same work.
nemo1618about 2 hours ago
I would love a crank-powered router. Would be a good way to curb internet addiction!
palmoteaabout 2 hours ago
> We chose a cheap off-the-shelf switchable voltage 20W hand-crank generator marketed for emergency USB charging. The Pi normally draws around 1.5A, but when it’s working hard (as it does when doing inference on the CPU), its current requirements can increase substantially, causing the generator voltage to sag below the Pi’s required 4.8V or even, in the case of a momentary 5A spike, to trigger the generator’s internal overcurrent protection and shut off the voltage output entirely, causing the Pi to brown out.

> To ensure the Pi sees a steady voltage when the full inference stack kicks in (and to afford crankers a little rest), we built a custom capacitor board [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Zv_Hsinvx_sWtdur4iWY...] to smooth out the generator’s output and act as a short-term (~20 second) power reservoir.

Somewhat off-topic, but could this capacitor board work with a small-ish 5V USB solar panel? I'm not great with electronics, but it seems like just the solution for a device I want to run with the panel.

My vague impression was it's not kosher per the USB spec to just stick a capacitor across the supply to even out the brown-outs, but this looks like it's doing some other stuff.

rpastuszakabout 2 hours ago
Playdate (the came console) is amazing for this! I was really bored once and built a Claude Code remote control for Playdate.

Voice recognition was done via parrot + handy.computer Basically: different key combos were tied to different actions, e.g. \

    - hold A to speak
    - move the crank slowly to navigate
    - crank super fast to send the prompt
Eventually this became a universal remote control for the computers in my home (YAML file with bindings from Playdate UI → A11y events). Using the crank to control movies is fun!

(I can share the source -- just let me know if this is actually useful)

Also, I feel like the author and me have similar hobbies. A few years back I almost won a (re-sellable on Ebay) award for https://meat-gpt.sonnet.io !

(I lost to a gallery of 3d sandwiches)

Waterluvianabout 2 hours ago
I really wanted to like the Playdate but it's such an unbelievably overpriced and underspecced toy. But the crank, which really looked like a gimmick, is oddly quite nice to have and I wish my kids' Retro Arcade had one.
piinbinaryabout 2 hours ago
I bet if you took one of Taalas' cards which consumes 200 watts for 14,000 tokens/second [0] and slowed it down by a factor of 10, it would actually be quite reasonable to power by bicycle.

[0]: https://www.sdxcentral.com/news/chip-designer-taalas-bets-on...

Advertisement
soylentcolaabout 3 hours ago
Not sure it's possible to say this without being pithy, but haven't there been stories told, perhaps TV episodes and films made, regarding the concept of using human bodies to generate power in support of machine intelligence?

Seems a little on the nose to me, but I guess some days it's hard to tell what's a gag and what's a legit pitch.

smileybarryabout 2 hours ago
soylentcolaabout 2 hours ago
Yeeeap. Was thinking about that and the Matrix mostly.
jfyiabout 2 hours ago
Yeah, it all makes sense now.
JKoliosabout 2 hours ago
Well, the Matrix did this. Badly. "Machines who have developed nuclear power are using human bodies as batteries"-level badly.
claysmithrabout 2 hours ago
Well, the original script said they used humans for their brainpower (computation)
stymaarabout 2 hours ago
This is hilarious.

And also it mades me realize that we would all be way more healthy if we powered our laptops from bike power.

joe_the_user7 minutes ago
I was hoping for a parody LLM that produced answers of increasing craziness until you stopped using it. Can someone point me to something like this?
square_usual6 minutes ago
You can make one yourself in ~100 lines of code.
johnnytech12 minutes ago
For the real hardware, what do you use as the AI computer? a Pi 5?
hmokiguessabout 3 hours ago
https://github.com/ktomanek/edge_voice_agent linked repo behind the concept
darkvertexabout 1 hour ago
And here I thought this was gonna be a Playdate GPT client app.
pickleballcourtabout 1 hour ago
I always kind of wondered if you were out on an island would this help with survival
misiek08about 2 hours ago
ACTUALLY xD Transferring power from gym bicycles is one of the smartest things. But they probably won’t even be enough for the AC to run - still a lot of power and heat lost.
simonreiffabout 2 hours ago
This is so cool; I wonder what the roadmap includes? I'd love to see if this could evolve from gag product/gift idea, to a solar-powered inference box on slightly more robust hardware, for instance, completely freeing the owner from any need to purchase a subscription or rely upon the grid for inference. That would be freaking cool and I'm sure would sell a ton if the models that could run on the hardware were sufficiently capable and could be piped into a laptop (which seems like the easiest part). What would the power requirements be to run a more capable model than the ones used, maybe a DeepSeek open-source model? Really curious but I'm unfamiliar with the technical details that might go into such calculations.
sciencejerkabout 1 hour ago
I think it's a joke?
reactordevabout 1 hour ago
I feel like Orange Theory has a new business prop...
Advertisement
xg15about 2 hours ago
The promo video is highly unrealistic.

No way there are still so many human devs in the office.

jihadjihadabout 2 hours ago
Can you adjust the weights with a Shake Weight™?
claysmithrabout 1 hour ago
need the south park episode with the shake weight version of this
capricornplabout 2 hours ago
So many questions... Does it support /effort setting? What about subagents and multi agent setups? What's the max token output on a diesel generator?
notahackerabout 2 hours ago
They're not raising at $1bn valuation until they pull out a slide deck with hockey stick curves showing the point that human brawn can out-think human brain...
harrouetabout 2 hours ago
Always amazed by the mount of time, effort and skill that goes into this kind of prank :).

(although I salute the attention it brings to an important cause)

Waterluvianabout 2 hours ago
I prefer the gooblebox over the flooblecrank design. It keeps my hands free for other activities.
Johnny_Bonkabout 1 hour ago
It's things like this that give me hope for humanity.
lukasbmabout 2 hours ago
15 Million Merits
Sharlinabout 2 hours ago
I'm pretty sure I've seen this in Black Mirror.
willXareabout 3 hours ago
Finally, proof that AI is just expensive cardio.
Advertisement
t1234sabout 2 hours ago
By the title I was hoping for an off-the-rails LLM on Crank.
cjs_acabout 3 hours ago
I thought this was going to be about LLM-generated conspiracy theories, but the website was funny anyway.

There's a technical documentation link at the bottom of the page that documents an actual working hand-crank-powered Raspberry Pi that runs a local model.

glaslongabout 2 hours ago
Oh that's a fun idea... I've been poking at a "ghost phone" that synthesizes a personality and matching voice, which rings at random times on an old candlestick rotodial handset.

"Conspiracy call-in" on a CB radio would be a good variation!

bogometerabout 2 hours ago
I will wait for the legion of hamster wheels power upgrade...
PhillyPhutureabout 2 hours ago
Missed opportunity to have Laurence Fishburne somewhere in the advertising.
panarchyabout 1 hour ago
Looking forward to cranking one out.
wettabout 3 hours ago
nit: “Is this real” dialog took a bit to load on mobile, a placeholder would be nice
rwoerz36 minutes ago
Now I have that image in mind, where some Morlock finds that thing 100000 years after we have blown up our civilization and can actually make use of it.
myworkaccount2about 2 hours ago
I can't tell if this is a joke, or they are serious.
cliffasaurusabout 2 hours ago
Finally an eco-friendly AI? Where the only water consumed is the glasses you drink because you got tired of cranking?
isuckatcodingabout 3 hours ago
Could one apply the same principle to a solar powered machine I wonder
Advertisement
smileybarryabout 2 hours ago
Whether it's a parody or satire or a fake product page for a DIY project, emphasizing the climate cost of AI while using AI to generate every video there kind of ruins it.
ivannzabout 1 hour ago
the versificator machine form Orwell’s 1984.
Joe_Coolabout 3 hours ago
I still prefer my Magic 8 Ball, it's less exhausting. But this is pretty cool.
zb3about 2 hours ago
Well, I assume this isn't real, but.. I'd want to know the actual number - how much more (than in the demo) work'd we need to do (energy to produce) to actually power a CPU/GPU which could use real small on-device models..

I really want to know, no matter how big that number unfortunately is.

movedx01about 3 hours ago
nice, cranker
teerayabout 2 hours ago
Now we know why everyone was generating power on bikes in “Fifteen Million Merits”
lostmsuabout 3 hours ago
I love this idea but for gamers who need an incentive to workout. You can only game on power you generated with your own muscles.
engineer_22about 3 hours ago
TBH I'd buy that.
utopiahabout 3 hours ago
Seems people do already, for your next small gift exchange or if you birthday look up "USB Hand Crank Phone Charger" it's like $20.

Edit: I confess, kind of tempted, 41 EUR for a "big" one https://www.bol.com/be/fr/p/zimoros-handslingergenerator-kra...

SecretDreamsabout 3 hours ago
I watched the "is this real" video and I'm still* not sure if it's real lol.

Regardless of this website presentation, the idea is sound and I'm behind it. We need to stop giving everything away to a hyper concentrated group of wealthy super elites that do not have our best interests at heart. We already have disappointing politicians that are elected. Now we also have disappointing unelected rich decision makers altering our lives based on what bar they had their next back of napkin scheme at.

yaroslavvbabout 3 hours ago
its real, I tried it a couple of weeks ago, asked some questions and got answers - https://x.com/yaroslavvb/status/2062692318415867983
SecretDreamsabout 3 hours ago
They need to tackle two American problems at once and turn it into an exercise bike!
doleabout 2 hours ago
Addressed in the video, but now looks like we've got three problems.
adam123456about 1 hour ago
hi
Advertisement
bozdemirabout 3 hours ago
Slavery with extra steps? Are we trying to power some douche-bag scientist's car battery?
bozdemirabout 1 hour ago
I guess ppl who down voted didnt get the Rick and Morty reference.
singpolyma3about 2 hours ago
... it's just a blank page?
sergiotapiaabout 1 hour ago
I ain't reading allat. Fix your website bro!
chaidhatabout 3 hours ago
In the future, humans will just all be on hamster wheels generating power for our AI overlords.
nobrainsabout 2 hours ago
The Matrix