Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

75% Positive

Analyzed from 310 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#more#article#fable#jailbreak#models#guardrails#https#com#comments#simple

Discussion (17 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

hk__2•about 2 hours ago
This is mostly a restatement of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48552687
dang•about 1 hour ago
Ok, we'e moved the comments thither, except the ones that are only relevant to current article.
fsckboy•about 1 hour ago
you missed the chance to also say hither
neogodless•about 2 hours ago
To expand on this:

Feds freaked over Fable 5 after simple 'fix this code' prompt, not jailbreak (theregister.com) 398 points | 6 hours ago | 223 comments

simonw•about 1 hour ago
This is a frustrating article - it provides no new information at all to support the claim that it was "never about a jailbreak".

I suspect there's more to the story than has been reported too, but I'd like information to help turn those suspicions into something more concrete.

kodt•about 1 hour ago
Yes, this is just an even shorter rehash of what has been said several times now.
jdavid•20 minutes ago
This article tries to make it sound like Anthropic is playing 4-D chess and sacrificed a pawn to force a better future outcome.

This seems too simple, and too complex at the same time.

siliconc0w•about 1 hour ago
I don't see how more advanced models won't get gated to specific known KYC'd entities. Classification-style guardrails will never be sufficient. Distillation attacks too are really hard to prevent. Open-source models can have their guardrails easily stripped away so it'll be incredibly dangerous to continue to release more and more capable OSS models that can and will be used to give bad actors 100x leverage.
deviation•about 2 hours ago
UrineSqueegee•about 2 hours ago
Should be pointed out this is an opinion article
andxor•about 1 hour ago
This is an opinion piece.
jadar•about 1 hour ago
I feel like this headline is a bit over-stated. There is not a ton of evidence it was about a jailbreak, and neither was there evidence that is was about retribution.
dualvariable•27 minutes ago
Ultimately, I bet Anthropic is fine with this because they needed to take Fable down to improve the guardrails (that were getting a ton of pushback) and they consider treating Fable as "too dangerous" to just be good PR hype for them. And they just get a little more anti-Trump "cred".
d4rkp4ttern•about 1 hour ago
TechCrunch articles should be ignored into oblivion.
exabrial•about 1 hour ago
I think this is pretty low quality content for HN.
Advertisement
cratermoon•about 2 hours ago
So the article calls it "knowledge gaps". Has technical expertise ever mattered when the law wants to ban or restrict something it doesn't like? The DMCA comes to mind.
SG-•about 1 hour ago
Look at how the Trump administration treats Canada, it's the same thing. They lie and make up reasons to punish countries that hurts their feelings.