FR version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
60% Positive
Analyzed from 295 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#ssh#keys#etc#secure#server#enclave#app#key#access#root

Discussion (4 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
I also think SSH certificate authentication mostly solves the “key comes from anywhere” problem by automatically expiring certificates.
This isn’t as immune to this type of attack as Secure Enclave, but you do get a benefit where the user has to get the correct certificate periodically in order to maintain access.
If I pass my credentials and certificates to someone else or someone steals them, they’ll eventually expire.
The impracticalities of Secure Enclave are obvious to all of us: recent Apple devices only.
The setup was a breeze! Did not try it with a server yet, but i don’t think anything would be radically different.
The server can have restrictions on where SSH keys are valid from. Furthermore the server side public SSH keys can be moved under /etc/ssh/keys so they are harder to tamper with vs a users .ssh dir in $HOME. This can significantly reduce the blast radius of a leaked key. Furthermore the server side file should be set immutable and read-only and something like Tripwire or OSSEC should be monitoring for changes to anything in /etc. Additionally one can limit access to SSH over a VPN such as Wireguard unless this is a public SFTP server.
Likely, sufficiently complex passwords will continue to be the frontline defense.