Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 190 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#openai#anthropic#models#deepseek#should#buildout#companies#mythos#class#model

Discussion (7 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

ndiddy•about 2 hours ago
So not only is the AI buildout increasing people's utility bills and the prices of consumer electronics, but now the general public isn't even allowed to benefit from the advanced AI models enabled by the buildout, only whatever large companies OpenAI and Anthropic let through their approval process. I guess the rest of us will have to wait for 6 months from now when Deepseek releases a Mythos class model at 5% of the cost.
lucamark•about 1 hour ago
while I generally agree that models with this level of cyber capability should not necessarily be released to everyone on day one, if a company or developer can meet compliance requirements, they should be eligible - and eligibility should not be based on nationality.

Your point is interesting! And with a Mythos-class model already on the market (e.g. DeepSeek or GLM), will OpenAI and Anthropic be forced to apply the same policy?

pitched•8 minutes ago
From what I gather, this is Anthropic-only because of disagreement there. OpenAI is not subject to apply the policy and the US has no power to limit foreign companies like Deepseek and GLM.
lucamark•4 minutes ago
> In other words, the Trump administration appears to be pressuring OpenAI to do what Anthropic is already voluntarily doing: keeping its most powerful AI models under wraps.
devilfileprong•14 minutes ago
Praxis: you are worthy to UNWOD? There can be a babel patch as grammaticality.
lucamark•about 3 hours ago
Uh great! I haven't seen these posts, thanks for the links :)