FR version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
67% Positive
Analyzed from 368 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#meta#models#selling#sell#access#infrastructure#said#company#capacity#business

Discussion (11 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
>The company is also considering selling access to “raw” computing capacity, akin to other so-called neocloud businesses like CoreWeave Inc., the people said. Development of these new business lines is part of Meta Compute, an internal initiative to build and manage the company’s AI infrastructure efforts, according to a person familiar with the plans. Meta Compute is led by Santosh Janardhan, Meta’s head of infrastructure; Daniel Gross, a leader inside the Meta Superintelligence Labs AI unit; and Meta President Dina Powell McCormick.
They have the concepts of a plan.... they will either sell tokens, sell GPU hours, or maybe just sell web hosting (like a Facebook page)
https://x.com/zephyr_z9/status/2072298455314436380
The meta culture has historically been known as "move fast and break things". This seems counter to a typical cloud business.
Seeing how meta works in ads and business interfaces for whatsapp/instagram, it seems that
1. meta lacks support and customer success functions for enterprise
2. meta lacks b2b sales functions/culture
3. meta lacks a scrutable high quality operations culture for their APIs (SLAs, scaling, etc).
These aren't easy things to gain, and we see the problems that the AI providers/azure/gcp etc have had historically as consequence of these various issues.
I hate the company, but I suspect their cloud provider would be a lot easier to use than the existing ones, and would be willing to use it at work.
After SpaceX (xAI), now Meta can't find better ways to make revenue than selling raw inference...
Hardware makers win.