Ask HN: Are systems ready for the first negative leap second?

AAsmod4n about 5 hours ago 6 comments

FR version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.

It’s been 10 years since we had the last leap second and it looks like we will get the first negative one soonish. Are systems ready for that?

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

33% Positive

Analyzed from 162 words in the discussion.

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

wmf•about 4 hours ago

Systems are absolutely not ready. Leap seconds are a bad idea and negative leap seconds are worse. Just don't do it and let the drift cancel out.

Bender•about 4 hours ago

Google's proposal is a smear. [1] Most time servers do not use smear. No idea what behavior it may introduce in places where sub-second time is important. Curious if all these bugs [2] were fixed specifically to deal with going backwards.

[1] - https://developers.google.com/time/smear

[2] - https://rivassec.com/leap-second-chaos-2012.html

d00d0ff000•about 5 hours ago

NTP.

By any other standard, most manually set clocks are up to a full minute off all the time.

subscribed•about 2 hours ago

Yeah, but we're thinking of systems where nanoseconds matter.

MiFID 2 alone forces sub-μs precision. Million times less than the leap 1 second.

NTP minute away is good for displaying date on the workstation, not for many of the devices that are critical to the modern world.

cyanydeez•about 2 hours ago

dont most systems that rely on sharp timing simply manage it themselves.

subscribed•about 1 hour ago

Yesno.

Sure they have their own time servers fed from the GPS, but they need to be _accurate_ in relation to the world.

But timestamps used by companies forced to use very accurate timing must be synchronised to UTC.