Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 159 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#someone#convincing#everyone#gimp#paint#clone#app#crude#zero#image

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

mchusma•about 13 hours ago
I’m not categorically against bans of this kind but I’m pretty sure everyone knows these are fake. I am worried about freedom of speech slippery slope issues, and also San Francisco (a relatively small eccentric city) trying to dictate US policy.
anthk•about 14 hours ago
Ban Gimp too. And any MS Paint clone.

And pencils. Any mediocre artist can deduce the anatomy of everyone under the clothes.

reassess_blind•about 14 hours ago
It’s the AI laziness that is most insulting. If someone wants to imagine me naked they better draw it themselves.
_vertigo•about 13 hours ago
Is this a real take? You don’t see a difference between an app that allows anyone to transform a picture of someone into a convincing nude within seconds with no skill boundary, and MS paint?
anthk•about 11 hours ago
Take any woman head, use PS on any porn snapshot, use the clone tool, now you have a crude approximation. PS or Gimp skills = near zero.
_vertigo•about 9 hours ago
The resulting image holds zero power compared to a realistic deepfake. A drawing or a crude photoshop is obviously artificial.

A deepfake can be used to blackmail, ruin someone’s reputation, or deeply unsettle them. The power of an artificial image along those dimensions scales exactly with how convincing it is.

An app that can generate convincing deepfakes quickly, cheaply, and easily is essentially a weapon.