FR version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
40% Positive
Analyzed from 693 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#context#file#more#ask#agent#save#local#session#text#don

Discussion (21 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
You're sending your context to someone's relay in plain text and loading it in plain text.
I've got to send it to your server so you can spit it back when I say a fancy word? What's worse, I pay you to just store/retrieve text? Why wouldn't I just write to a file?
I tend to spend a lot more time planning than what it takes to execute/build what I'm after.. then more time reviewing again than the produce step(s) and iterate.
For that matter, I'll track what I'm wanting and what has been done via TODO.md file in project(s).
I'm not sure I would ever use/trust a service like this myself. I barely trust the AI providers as it is.
I was having a similar product idea and quickly abandoned it after a demo ready.
Checkout https://memory.store/ (not affiliated). They target 2B users and focus more on centralized knowledge management for organizations, which I feel is more reasonable.
My current workaround is to write the context as a Markdown file and save it to disk, then let both of two CLI to read. I'd like to ask you, what are the advantages of this tool compared to using a file as a bridge?
I don’t think I’d like using a third party server for this, but a skill that just handles it locally or something would be useful.
But perhaps this could be used to build a local solution with a little more added value. It might be interesting to use the context to determine which AI solves the problem best or most cost-effectively.