Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 212 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#pppoe#fiber#hardware#isps#bell#xfinity#along#half#bridge#isp

Discussion (10 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

sarabveer•6 minutes ago
> Even in 2026, a huge number of ISPs still rely on PPPoE, including Bell Canada, AT&T Fiber, and Xfinity in the US, along with the vast majority of ISPs in Europe, Asia, and China.

Comcast (Xfinity) does not use PPPoE.

sage981•32 minutes ago
The UCG Fiber numbers make the case: this is a SoC acceleration gap, not a PPPoE overhead problem. Half-bridge is a workaround for hardware Ubiquiti shipped.
nottorp•26 minutes ago
Oh thanks. My local ISP insists on pppoe even for business lines.

I like the unifi APs but then using their gateways is a no-no.

davidhariri•about 1 hour ago
In my specific situation I was able to use this WAS-110 to get full speed PPPoE from my fiber provider (Bell).

https://pon.wiki/guides/masquerade-as-the-bce-inc-giga-hub-2...

q3k•about 2 hours ago
I miss when this kind of content would've just been two paragraphs and a config snippet.

(also, this isn't a "Show HN")

simonjgreen•about 1 hour ago
I mean at this point just ditch the Unifi? You have a much more capable gateway in play now that needs to have equal to greater throughput than the one you are bridging for.
p_l•about 1 hour ago
No, the half-bridge is less capable for various functions, but happens to have hardware PPPoE offload which makes it faster for this specific function but not for others
cr3ative•about 2 hours ago
I always suspected this was possible but having it demonstrated is excellent. I would assume this would be of most benefit on an OpenWRT box which _does_ support hardware offload!
mono442•about 2 hours ago
I guess what they did works but it makes some of valid ip addresses unavailable.
ksk23•about 1 hour ago
Was thinking along the same lines; why do we hardcode a /24? Is that reality in ISP last mile networks?!