Andy Pavlo Joins ClickHouse to Establish ClickHouse Labs

nnikolay_sivko about 3 hours ago 20 commentsRead Article on clickhouse.com

FR version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

91% Positive

Analyzed from 621 words in the discussion.

Discussion (20 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

tomsanbear•about 1 hour ago

Always enjoyed his lecture series from CMU, hopefully those continue in a sponsored format from Clickhouse.

apavlo•29 minutes ago

They will continue. New seminar series starts next month (announcement coming this week).

danlark1•about 1 hour ago

Congrats, that's incredible news. Watched apavlo@'s lectures while studying in the university and finished my bachelor thesis implementing features and doing research at ClickHouse. Surprised to see these worlds being together now!

jzelinskie•about 1 hour ago

Congratulations, Andy! This sounds like a great opportunity and continues your bet that SQL always wins out in the end.

What idea are you most excited about to work on first?

nikhilsimha•25 minutes ago

Congrats! Andy is incredible!

throwaw12•about 1 hour ago

That's great news for Clickhouse and for Andy I guess, they are both obsessed with databases and are at the cutting edge.

adrianco•about 1 hour ago

Hi Andy, that’s very cool news. Will you be at the HPTS workshop in October?

pphysch•about 1 hour ago

> The goal of ClickHouse Labs is to establish a best-in-class industry research organization focused on databases. It will not operate as an isolated research organization that throws ideas over the wall to engineering. Instead, we will work closely with ClickHouse engineers, customers, collaborators, and industry partners to develop and disseminate new ideas that keep ClickHouse at the bleeding edge.

This is cool, though bittersweet that the public research infrastructure (universities) is not really configured to support this kind of high-impact research any more.

sghiassy•about 1 hour ago

Clickhouse Labs is a research lab for ClickHouse’s engineers and their db product?

Whatever floats your boat. Sounds like you just work as an engineer at a db company

lumost•about 1 hour ago

Deep tech fields have a more complex relationship with academia than other industries. Engineers often need license to test ideas that may not see adoption for years, or require tens of millions to build-out.

A "research" arm is exactly this license, although it comes at the cost of potentially killing innovation in the rest of the company.

ForHackernews•about 1 hour ago

C'mon, databases are great but they are not in any way a "deep tech" field. Databases exist today in a zillion production forms as commercial products and free software.

Deep tech includes things like nuclear fusion, solid state batteries, quantum computers. I know everyone wants to feel cool, but just because your new javascript framework will be in beta for the next ten years doesn't make it "deep tech".

jandrewrogers•31 minutes ago

The databases we use today in production have severe limitations and are not even close to what is theoretically possible. Many traditional parts of a database (indexing, caching, scheduling, et al) are AI-complete algorithm problems. Entire sub-classes of database (e.g. graph or spatial) famously have persistently poor scalability and performance because of open questions in the foundational computer science.

Just the fact that increasing the generality, scalability, and performance of databases asymptotically converges on designing AGI suggests that it is, in fact, "deep tech". And this property has to mesh with other practical constraints on database behavior. Many problems in databases are hard with little forward progress in decades.

It is true that most database research is not deep tech but there is ample room for it to be if one is sufficiently ambitious.

lumost•about 1 hour ago

I'd ascribe "deep tech" to anything that you can reasonably get a PhD in and have it not be unusual. There are dozens of academic conferences on DBs pushing the frontier forward.

apavlo•about 1 hour ago

I'm not sure what you think "research lab" means? As I mentioned in the article, we look at IBM Research (Almaden) and Microsoft Research as inspiration.

ForHackernews•about 1 hour ago

Looking forward to the database analogues of IBM Watson and Tay.ai

I'm partly kidding; there's plenty of space for innovation in databases. You should sponsor https://sled.rs/

jandrewrogers•about 1 hour ago

Many database companies have research labs. It allows you to explore ideas, unorthodox concepts, and parts of the design space that may never be reflected in an actual product. Or to figure out how to solve specific hard problems that you come across with neither a good solution nor proof of impossibility in literature.

This is essential for a company that wants to stay on the frontier of database tech.

bedman12345•4 minutes ago

Which database companies have research labs? AFAIK amazon, snowflake, databricks, google and SAP don’t have a research lab dedicated to databases. They have some people that are paid to do research but there does not seem to be an IBM Almaden anywhere in the world.

astrange•about 1 hour ago

> ClickHouse had features that at the time were only found in a handful of closed-source, commercial analytical DBMSs. For example, ClickHouse was written in C++ and supported vectorized query execution using SIMD in 2016. Most prominent open-source analytical DBMSs in 2016 were JVM-based and did not support SIMD optimizations until years later.

Performance is a feature. "Written in C++" is a strange idea of a feature.