Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 543 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#palantir#data#medical#news#permission#don#fine#something#off#again

Discussion (17 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

jpfromlondon•about 2 hours ago
>In all cases they do not have permission to use the data for their own purposes

Oh, they don't have permission? probably fine then.

oliwarner•about 1 hour ago
While I agree, permission still means something.

If they're found to have held onto it, processed it or shared it, they'll be told off very sternly and asked politely to not do it again.

andrewstuart•about 2 hours ago
Definitely fine.

All the Palantir employees have read that clause of course.

In Australia when the biggest health insurer had ALL patient records stolen, the Board of Directors immediately granted themselves very large cash bonuses (true).

Oras•about 2 hours ago
Insert "this is fine" meme
numpad0•about 2 hours ago
Is Palantir obsessed with medical records? If so why?

This is worrying as there recently was a change in the Japanese PII law, relatively unceremoniously passed and enacted, that reclassify mass PII collection including medical data collection as anonymous and consent-free with the condition that anonymization is performed after collection, which, IMO, IANAL, completely nullify the PII law. I can easily "see" Palantir behind it with my tinfoil hat on, but I'm not sure why do anyone want it in the first place. I don't think they need medical data specifically to take people to the back and dispose of the body.

kotaKat•about 2 hours ago
> Is Palantir obsessed with medical records? If so why?

Daddy Thiel needs a bloodbank. The last one mysteriously died under the guise of a 'suicide'.

https://www.inc.com/jeff-bercovici/peter-thiel-young-blood.h...

gambiting•about 2 hours ago
I'm guessing because insurance companies would love to put their hands on that data, so it can be repackaged and sold off. Or Palantir can offer a model trained on it, so it's not technically selling the data itself.
gambiting•about 2 hours ago
So, what is going to happen now? Someone in the UK government goes "ooops, sorry" and Palantir gets to keep access to this data? Or are we just going to have another 10 year long enquiry of how exactly this happened that leads to no consequences for anyone while US company siphons up our personal info, again?
alexisread•about 2 hours ago
Wow this was moved fast off the frontpage! Now on page 3 after 50min. Just FYI.
robin_reala•about 1 hour ago
I was wondering. Usually if something drops a couple of pages suddenly it’s because of the flamewar trigger: the number of comments exceeding the number of upvotes is a proxy measure for something not designed to elucidate meaningful discussion. Here, it dropped when it got to ~90 upvotes to 15 comments, so it wasn’t that trigger. Maybe as it’s a UK-specific story the concentrated geographical voting pattern triggered a voting-ring trigger?
alexisread•about 1 hour ago
And this comment is being downvoted as well to hide the fact.
bananaflag•about 2 hours ago
Now the deed is done, one cannot undo it.
hollow-moe•about 2 hours ago
"Whoops sorrgy! Your honor, I plead silly :3c"
jascination•about 2 hours ago
This is insanely fucked up, but also unsurprising.
LtWorf•about 2 hours ago
Many years ago I had a job offer in UK and a friend who was already living there who was very keen on me moving there.

Honestly every single time there is news about UK, I am glad I didn't take the offer.

Then again, me being already not very enthusiastic about the place had a role in my decision.

happymellon•about 1 hour ago
Because Palantir have government contracts? Seriously?

You claim to be in Sweden, then you should surely know that Palantir are very much in bed with the government there including police monitoring.

gambiting•about 2 hours ago
I mean, it's all a matter of perspective and where you are coming from. Like, I could easily say that literally any piece of news coming from the US makes me not want to move there no matter how much money you pay me. But at the end of the day, it's just news. It's like that whole panic about London being the most surveiled city in the world with the most cameras per capita in the world - and of course neglecting to mention that most of these cameras are in private hands and police don't have access to them. Get your car or bike stolen in London and discover that no, the police cannot just track them street by street like in James Bond.

I literally had someone ask me the other day if it's safe to go to London. Like, to visit as a tourist. We've reached some level of absurdity that is almost comedic, but that's what news does to people.