Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 142 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#data#lead#correction#ukhsa#link#vaccine#argued#inaccurate#published#article

Discussion (2 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Caligatioabout 2 hours ago
The HN title and the original sub headline are inaccurate per the published correction at the end of the article.

CORRECTION: In a previous version of this article, we reported that that the UKHSA had refused to release data that could link the Covid vaccine to excess deaths, as it argued that “releasing the data would lead to the ‘distress or anger’ of bereaved relatives if a link was found.” This was inaccurate; the UKHSA did not argue that the data could lead to the distress or anger of bereaved relatives if a link were found. In fact, it argued that the data could lead to “the families of the deceased being subjected to unsolicited approaches by the media and anti-vaccine campaigners”. This correction has been published following a partly upheld complaint to the Independent press Standards Organisation.

aand16about 1 hour ago
Distinction without a difference?

> UKHSA argued that the data could lead to “the families of the deceased being subjected to unsolicited approaches by the media and anti-vaccine campaigners”

Sounds like a made up reason to justify not releasing statistics.