Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

90% Positive

Analyzed from 248 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#data#google#spirit#privacy#training#businesses#https#com#bankruptcy#company

Discussion (13 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

theodpHN•4 minutes ago
Anyone see Google's intended use of the collected data spelled out in the "Primary Purpose for Collection and Use of Data" in the Spirit Privacy Agreement? Asking for 1.2 billion Spirit passengers. https://content.spirit.com/Shared/en-us/Documents/Privacy_Po...
jacquesm•11 minutes ago
It's high time we get signed warrants that upon bankruptcy all data will be destroyed so it won't be used to make good either the creditors or the shareholders of the company that went under. I can't imagine any good outcome here, and change of control should result in an automatic withdrawal of any consent, no matter what assurances of privacy are given by the buyer.
emsign•1 minute ago
So Google is training AI to run businesses that go bankrupt now? That's not very smart.
igregoryca•21 minutes ago
As someone not super familiar with bankruptcy procedure: why do they auction off exclusive access to the data? Couldn't they make more money by, say, taking the top N offers, where N is "small" (e.g., ≤5)? Or does that depress the price too much?
ygjb•about 2 hours ago
I would love to see a rider from the courts mandating a significant third party test by privacy researchers to see if the deidentified data can be reconstructed from models post training.
geoduck14•about 2 hours ago
The article mentions: a 3rd party company will scrub the data amd Google will promise not to attempt to reconstruct PII from the data.

That is good enough for me. If they violate their promise to the judge, the court can lay the hammer down on them

DauntingPear7•about 2 hours ago
Maybe we can all be blessed with 2 quarters from a multi-year class action in a decade
m4rtink•about 2 hours ago
Good, they never break promises, so it should be fine. It also implies you can reconstruct personal information from the data. Perfect.
gessha•31 minutes ago
Here, you dropped this: /s
robocat•about 2 hours ago
Using data from failed businesses as training data: what could go wrong?
kevmo314•34 minutes ago
Maybe we can help businesses fail faster
geetee•about 2 hours ago
Ah, rare data hunters.
krackers•35 minutes ago