FR version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
50% Positive
Analyzed from 245 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#email#case#link#sender#should#end#view#electronic#monthly#statement

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
https://nrwe.justiz.nrw.de/ovgs/vg_duesseldorf/j2026/29_K_73...
Until then all we have are solutions that only work between a small handful of providers or "click this link to view your secure message" garage that could just as easily be replaced and faked.
Just a completely hostile experience -- I am going to stick with the paper, thanks. Let me know when you can send me a monthly PDF.
> On its way to the customer, the invoice was intercepted by an attacker, who then manipulated the account number to their own advantage.
How did the attacker gain access to the email? Most likely they breached the account of either the sender or the recipient. In the first case the breach should be on the sender and they should pay the damage. In the latter case the damage should be on the recipient.
The only case where this has much to do with email security is when an email server is breached.
This whole article is a lot of words around very little information.
This wasn’t decisive anyway, as this civil case just focused on the method of transport chosen by the Plaintiff.