Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 155 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#same#talk#chat#why#remember#character#human#sentence#reason#local

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

fouc•about 2 hours ago
Great idea! After all why reinvent the wheel with TUI libraries built in a popular browser-based front-end javascript framework?
JoshTriplett•about 2 hours ago
I remember using talk back when first learning Linux in college. I enjoyed the character-by-character aspect of it.
em500•about 1 hour ago
Yes, I've wondered many times why there are no modern (human to human) chat interfaces that implements that, rather than sentence by sentence.
Brian_K_White•about 1 hour ago
The same reason tar and dd and practically everything operates on blocks not bytes, plus the same reason the shell doesn't act until eol delimiter, the opportunity to edit before submit.

I think talk could get away with it because on a shared local host both sides are accessing the same local physical resource directly, no tcp packet per byte.

nenadg•about 3 hours ago
I used talk back in 90ties and loved it and still missing it. Interfacing this with LLM is a nice touch.
Chris2048•about 2 hours ago
Interesting chat widget in the corner.

I've been looking for something similar I saw once, it was a chat widget connecting to everyone looking at the same webpage.

But it was called something like "aarrrgh!!" (the pirate), and I can't remember the name of the damn thing!