Access to Urban Woodlands Linked with Lower Use of Antidepressants

Discussion (4 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

ossicones•about 3 hours ago

There's a strange contradiction in the findings, even just those in the abstract. When they look across individuals and try to predict antidepressant use based on exposure to woodlands, they find higher use among those who live closer to woodlands. It's only when they look at individual trajectories that they see reduced antidepressant use lining up with periods where they lived closer to woodlands.

It's almost like the same type of people who use antidepressants also like to live near woodlands. And they get depressed when they don't live near woodlands.

dmicah•8 minutes ago

In the abstract they argue that this is because the woodland improvement program located woods in socioeconomically deprived areas. But in general they shouldn't be making any causal claims with observational data like this. It's a frequent problem that popular press takes a study and reframes an association as causation for their story.

b112•42 minutes ago

With the property values in Palo Alto, I almost expect a dude funded this study, just to boost a property value by a few million. Eg, one near Standford Hills or whatever.

(it does feel nice to walk in nature though)

AnthonBerg•about 3 hours ago

My catchprase as of late: Everything is pulmonary.

Apropos of nothing.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/01.res.50.3.325

Access to Urban Woodlands Linked with Lower Use of Antidepressants

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion (4 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews