Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 119 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#cube#twists#degree#god#number#flat#should#introduction#degrees#least

Discussion (3 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

NAR8789•about 4 hours ago
I'm confused... The introduction allows twists of 60 degrees, but the explanation seems to switch to assuming 180 degree twists.

What am I missing?

edit: ah, I missed an "at least" at the beginning. He shows god's number is *at least* 27 (I misread this as meaning exactly 27). And he does this by showing god's number for the uncolored flat cube is 27. The uncolored flat cube happens to be equivalent to the colored cube with 180 degree twists.

Though... given that, the colors like a bit of an unnecessary red herring. Just a literary bridge I suppose? From his amusing introduction about a magic schoolbus running over rubik's cubes?

drivebyhooting•about 3 hours ago
180 degree was for Rubik’s cube, not this flat cube.
boothby•about 1 hour ago
> I’m undecided as to whether every rotation should count as one move or whether rotations by 120 or 180 degrees should count as two or three moves respectively, so there are two versions of “God’s number” here.

Clearly, it should be the sum of (absolute) turn angles. In radians, please.