Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 313 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#deadpan#image#nonsense#photography#neutral#https#anderson#highly#point#across

Discussion (11 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

jefc1111•about 2 hours ago
Several of the examples in the article are from the Dusseldorf school of photography (which I am a big fan of in general).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%BCsseldorf_school_of_phot...

My gateway photo was Cabbage Field by Simone Nieweg

https://www.dailyartmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/...

RattlesnakeJake•about 2 hours ago
I feel like that term could also be used to describe Wes Anderson's filming style. The static shots and dead-centered framing are as much of a deadpan comedic character as anything happening in the scene.
kmoser•15 minutes ago
To some degree, yes, except that Anderson's sets and costumes are highly stylized to the point where they come across as contrived and artificial, which is at odds with the naturalistic deadpan aesthetic.
_ink_•about 1 hour ago
I am confused. My understanding is, that deadpan photography is a very neutral way of photographing things. 99 cents on the other hand was highly digitally altered by gursky, it is not neutral at all. How is it an example for deadpan photography?
cwillu•26 minutes ago
“Now notice that you are being watched. The image is watching you look at it. It knows what it is doing.”

What in the SCP…

9dev•22 minutes ago
The point is that the image is composed in a particular way to appear entirely un-composed, spontaneous, but plays with that appearance. The artistic part of the image is that relationship between you, as the viewer, and the composition of it.

Sort of like a person with an amazing taste in fashion, dressing shoddily - but in such a camp way, it's very obviously purposeful in its shoddiness, making it a fashion statement again.

...but yeah, I stumbled across that sentence too.

abstractspoon•4 days ago
> Now notice that you are being watched. The image is watching you look at it. It knows what it is doing.

That's when I stopped reading

tasuki•about 2 hours ago
I had a similar reaction. If someone could chime in and explain how this isn't absolute nonsense, I'd be grateful.
girvo•about 1 hour ago
I can’t tell if it’s just normal art-writing nonsense or AI-helped nonsense anymore
Isamu•about 1 hour ago
AI-helped nonsense is nowhere near a peak, I wish I could place a bet on the ascendancy of AI-assisted nonsense
3-cheese-sundae•about 1 hour ago
If the parent had kept reading, they might have discovered the retroactive explanation of that sentence:

"This is the form’s real operation. Deadpan does not convince you it is neutral. It performs neutrality in a way that lets you enjoy both the performance and your awareness of it. You are in on the joke. The image says it didn’t choose, and you know it chose, and both of you agree to pretend otherwise because the pretence produces something valuable: attention."