Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 180 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#armed#united#states#under#unless#https#www#election#force#necessary

Discussion (4 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

throw0101a•about 3 hours ago
See perhaps 18 U.S. Code § 592:

> Whoever, being an officer of the Army or Navy, or other person in the civil, military, or naval service of the United States, orders, brings, keeps, or has under his authority or control any troops or armed men at any place where a general or special election is held, unless such force be necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both; and be disqualified from holding any office of honor, profit, or trust under the United States.

* https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/592

Per DoJ guidance this also means that FBI agents cannot conduct investigations inside polling places on Election Day and deputy U.S. marshals cannot be stationed at open polls because they are armed while on duty:

* https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-J-PURL-gpo145659/...

someguynamedq•about 2 hours ago
And who defines "unless such force be necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States"?
latexr•about 2 hours ago
There seems to always be an encoded loophole, eh? Though while marking anyone an “enemy” is subjective to interpretation, “armed” not so much. Unless, of course, you bring a sandwich with you to the polls.

https://www.mediaite.com/crime/footlong-and-fancy-free-d-c-j...

foolin•about 2 hours ago
Voters had better show up naked which may counteract the attempts to limit the vote to the christian right.