Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

62% Positive

Analyzed from 2392 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#solar#roof#tesla#panels#musk#install#more#tiles#amazon#need

Discussion (101 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Zigurdabout 2 hours ago
Optimus robots will arrive in Robo taxis to install your Tesla solar roof which will also receive Internet and XAI LLM service from orbiting data centers. When? By the end of the year.
walrus01about 1 hour ago
You forgot the "XAI LLM service powered by 60 gas turbines in Memphis running the grok CSAM generator"
delusionalabout 1 hour ago
That'll be in space by mid next month*
moomoo11about 1 hour ago
"Money won't matter in 10 years"

"Time won't matter either"

dgellowabout 1 hour ago
Don’t forget to pay the $10k to keep your spot in the waiting list!
TrainedMonkeyabout 1 hour ago
Grok confidently said it can be done by the end of the year when Elon asked so it must be true.
jordanbabout 1 hour ago
But can I pay in dogecoin?
ben_wabout 1 hour ago
I hear that goes to the moon. :P
Zigurdabout 1 hour ago
Only after being refueled by 15 other giant rockets.
formvoltron32 minutes ago
With $20T TAM!
boredatomsabout 1 hour ago
I enjoy this style of absurdism humor
moomoo11about 1 hour ago
they will be built in Mars Factory X and similar to Titanfall they'll be orbital striked to where they need to go
senordevnycabout 1 hour ago
Via hyperloop
Johnyjohnson123about 1 hour ago
Hahahaha
queuebertabout 1 hour ago
How did we get to the point where, on this YC site, deriding advanced technology was popular?
jaapbadlandsabout 1 hour ago
You've mistaken the subject for the target. The subject of the derision is advanced technology, the target is Tesla promising what they're incapable of delivering.
formvoltron29 minutes ago
"what I'm gonna do" is not advanced technology. More like a modern version of the Duke and the Dauphin.
ElProlactinabout 1 hour ago
> Tesla offloaded the hardest, least profitable part of the Solar Roof — the physical install and the customer relationship — onto small local companies, let them absorb the training and tooling costs, and then pulled the product out from under them.

I wonder how many of the companies understood this is what Tesla was doing, and recognized the risk inherent in their position.

iugtmkbdfil834about 1 hour ago
It is going sound awful ( and I resist it myself, because of what it implies about us in general ), but best predictor of human behavior is what they have done in the past. There is a reason I don't own anything Tesla and last time I looked at solar roof, I explicitly noted that this brand is not an option. Nothing this expensive is allowed to become abandonware this easily. I have to assume he will be sued hard, because that kind of practice needs to be penalized hard by our society.
chidabout 1 hour ago
If you look at the history it was doomed to fail. I wouldn’t blame it on Tesla.
vardalababout 1 hour ago
Who would you blame it on? Physics, gravity, destiny?
theflyinghorseabout 1 hour ago
It’s the whole business for the installers. You get margin where you can, and that for them is in the marketing and selling and installing and supporting for the customers.
delusionalabout 1 hour ago
Coming from a family of local contractors, some of whom install HVAC and such. Most of them probably understood this. It's part of the business. Pretty much every product, you are going to install, has some sort of training required, to install it properly, such that the manufacturer warranty isn't voided.
cramer4next4 minutes ago
I'm from the same background of contractors. This stuff happens all the time and is nothing unqiue to Tesla. The regular anti: Musk, Ellison and Zuckerberg crowd out with their drums and masks again.
MichaelZuoabout 1 hour ago
Yeah it would be more surprising if they didn’t have a mandatory expensive program considering how much more complex it is than normal roofing stuff.
queuebertabout 1 hour ago
Is it? Modern roofing is pretty complex and is begging for innovation, even with materials that don't generate electricity.
shevy-javaabout 1 hour ago
Some probably did not know, but they learned a hard lesson here.

Smaller companies should ideally help trade with one another and cut off those greedy billionaire corporations that will eat them up whenever they can - or betray them, as Tesla showed this here.

toomuchtodoabout 1 hour ago
Nah, same with Amazon delivery subcontractors. This is sophisticated capitalists and industrialists preying on the unsophisticated.
felixgalloabout 1 hour ago
Do you suspect Amazon is going to stop delivering packages?
a4ismsabout 1 hour ago
I can't speak for anyone else, but I suspect that Amazon are nearly continuously planning for automated deliveries. Drones? Trucks with lockers that stop in front of your house and you retrieve your delivery?

I dunno, but there's no way Bezos doesn't look at his drivers and delivery partners and think, "Your livelihood will soon be my margin."

Rebelgeckoabout 1 hour ago
Colloquially, no. But do I think there will be W-2 employees of Amazon.com, Inc (dba Amazon) delivering packages? Definitely not. It's not like Amazon owned the Prime Air plane that crashed yesterday, or employed the pilots
ben_wabout 1 hour ago
To add to sibling comment about the "contractor" part being the key word: https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=...
toomuchtodoabout 1 hour ago
I suspect they will continue to use “contractors” until regime change forces them not to. Midterms look good for swinging toward Dems (due to gestures broadly at everything), and this federal admin has an end date (relates to NLRB and employee classification enforcement). These issues change on an arc over years or decades.

NYC has started to do this until then: https://www.nyc.gov/mayors-office/news/2026/08/mayor-mamdani...

Bloomberg investigation: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2026-06-02/amazon-tr... | https://archive.today/3Nnj9

SpicyLemonZestabout 1 hour ago
Altogether, no. But I do think a combination of Amazon Locker, autonomous vehicles and perhaps drones are likely to radically change how last-mile delivery looks, and I don't think it's a coincidence that so much of that network currently offloads the capital onto third-party contractors.
mytailorisrichabout 1 hour ago
It seems to me that this is standard practice in the industry (solar panels/batteries, HVAC, boilers, heat pumps, etc). And, yes it leaves you at risk if the supplier decides to cancel the product(s) or if they just go bust.

Electrek has a bias against Tesla/Musk, IMHO and so tend to paint everything in a negative way. You need to take what they write with a grain of salt.

delusionalabout 1 hour ago
> Electrek has a bias against Tesla/Musk, IMHO and so tend to paint everything in a negative way.

I would say Tesla and Musk are a little bit worse here than Siemens or Honda or whatever. Usually the manufacturers don't lie quite as loudly about the future of the product.

I'm sure Tesla has been more opaque then other manufacturers, but I agree that the consequence here is just normal course of business stuff.

atonseabout 1 hour ago
I've never seen a person have such a frothing-at-the-mouth hate for any company as Fred Lambert at Elektrek has for Musk/Tesla.

Just filter for his posts, it's kind of crazy. After a few posts I started noticing a while back. Lambert writes like Elon Musk killed his puppies with his bare hands.

It causes Lambert to have nearly zero credibility in anything he writes about Tesla. It doesn't come from a place of good faith reporting.

tempestn43 minutes ago
I do agree that Lambert's coverage of Tesla appears to be pretty one-sided, and that the company has provided significant benefits to the world, but I also think there's a reasonable case to be made that Musk himself is a uniquely deleterious figure, even if the harm he brings isn't with his bare hands.
doodlebuggingabout 1 hour ago
I wonder about those first adopters and where this leaves them with future support or warranty issues. The system itself looks so different from standard panel-based rooftop solar that installers will need to have been trained to install the tiles. After those installers get stiffed I feel like they might have zero incentive to come out and look at any systems that develop issues over time.

I looked at this tile-based solar when he (Musk) announced it and while it looks like a perfect system if you can make it all work, a standard roof-top solar system is easier to install and maintain. I have enough space at my place that I can install the panels in a ground mount so there was no reason to consider this specialty setup. If I had purchased a system like this I would definitely have extra components on hand in case something breaks.

I would treat it like the first model year of a new vehicle design. Buy the second or third model year so most of the problems are someone else's.

JKCalhounabout 1 hour ago
Well, class-action lawsuits are a thing.
freediddyabout 1 hour ago
Tesla Solar Roof has been dead for years and years. Any installers continuing with this knew the writing was on the wall years ago. My friend got a solar roof and they doubled the price on him to over 100k after they signed the contract, and tried to strong arm him into agreeing to the new price. This was 3 or 4 years ago, and once the prices doubled to 100k+ you knew that the entire thing was dead.

Typical Musk behavior to try to break the contract and try to re-negotiate even though it's clearly illegal.

Reubendabout 2 hours ago
Is there any competitor in the USA? The idea of roof tiles which are themselves solar panels seems sensible to me, and it's more aesthetically pleasing than putting panels on top of normal tiles.
walrus01about 2 hours ago
It's extremely labor intensive and costly to put stuff up on the roof, and problematic in terms of electrical connector, electrical safety, and being proprietary for mounting and roof repair. Big ass PV panels that are 2.0 x 1.0 meter in size (or larger) are so cheap now for photovoltaic ground mounts that the labor and mounting can actually cost more than the panels.

460W panels can be something like $0.25 USD per STC watt in single pallet quantities shipped as LTL freight.

Or at least if you have to use your roof, just put them on boring aluminum rail mounts on roofs which are a much more known factor for roofing repair and labor.

trueno43 minutes ago
without having looked into the tesla roof tiles like at all (so stop reading here if you want any sort of informed discussion), are these things like placed individually and wired together individually? does every tile get a microinverter or is it like a net of tiles belong to one? is this potentially hundreds of connectors acrossed your roof that would be so many points of failure. if so that seems nuts and hardly worth the absurd cost just for aesthetics. feel like anyone who can afford this could just have whatever roof they want and then have their solar array farm nearby on their presumably many acres of land.

in the marine/rv world there are like walkable solar panels that you can literally just like walk on now, theres solar awnings, i dunno. just in my limited experience i'd be surprised if they dont have the christmas light problem (one goes out many go out) and solar arrays just seem to do awesome in panel configurations and i think in the consumer world theyre reaching 25% conversion, no idea what tesla is marketing but those guys are dorks with marketing anyways

_JamesA_about 1 hour ago
How does one go about acquiring these?
walrus01about 1 hour ago
By googling wholesale solar panel dealers, one example would be https://krannich-solar.com/us-en/

Assuming you're in the US 48 states there should be plenty of companies that'll take your money for a factory sealed pallet load of panels. They come wrapped up from the factory, basically all they do is do the invoicing/billing to you, they buy them by the 40' or 45' container load and then load them onto trucks at a loading dock.

PV panel factory datasheets will clearly specify how many are on a pallet and how many pallets fit in a single container.

rsynnottabout 1 hour ago
It's a slightly weird proposition, in that, well, pitched roofs last about 50 to 100 years, typically (at least here; I gather it _is_ somewhat different in the US due to different materials and building standards). So you probably don't really _want_ to prematurely replace your whole roof, so your market is basically... people who happen to need a roof replaced right now?

They also appear to have been _extremely_ expensive. Like on the order of 10x the cost of a conventional solar installation.

Conventional solar panels look perfectly fine to me, FWIW.

IgorPartolaabout 1 hour ago
There are apparently several traditional roof shingle makers who have previewed solar tiles. A friend of mine who is a roofer told me he would not trust Tesla and is waiting for a reliable supplier. Apparently he is a smart man.
JKCalhounabout 1 hour ago
Hundreds (and hundreds?) of tiles with twice that number of electrical connectors… what could possible go wrong?

I mean vs. a dozen or twenty large, conventional panels.

Maybe we need to adjust our aesthetics before we compromise the engineering overly much.

readthenotes1about 1 hour ago
Sorta.

The closest I know of is https://www.gaf.com/en-us/roofing-materials/residential-roof...

The advantage is that you don't have to drill additional holes into your roof, nor do you have to have shingles under the solar panels.

Depending on where you live and how much you pay in taxes, they may be enticing.

sorenjanabout 1 hour ago
Jackery Solar Roof.
Vasloabout 1 hour ago
Clearly it’s very expensive and people aren’t paying for it.
dbt00about 2 hours ago
No, it's an impractical idea that nobody wanted.
bjelkeman-againabout 1 hour ago
I did want it. Would have looked great on my quite old house where it is highly impractical to have conventional solar panels, as there is essentially not enough space anywhere to have more than one or two panels in the same location, and I need new tiles soon anyway.

I think it turns out it was announced too early and attempted to scale before it was ready (turns out it won't be ready at all in this iteration).

delectiabout 1 hour ago
> not enough space anywhere to have more than one or two panels in the same location

That isn't necessarily a downside though. By having panels on a variety of orientations on your roof, you can spread out the generation through the day and mitigate a bit of the duck curve.

KeplerBoyabout 1 hour ago
JKCalhounabout 1 hour ago
Interesting. They look great on a single-surface roof with 90° edges. It seems that as soon as your roof deviates from that the aesthetics begin to trend toward conventional PV panels (which of course also do not accommodate more complex roof profiles).
monster_truckabout 1 hour ago
They do the same thing with their cars! Incredibly expensive proprietary fasteners that you might only need 12 of sold in unit sizes like 500 or 1000. Sometimes they change multiple times per model year. You cannot buy them secondhand or share with other shops as part of the agreement to buy them in the first place. Know a couple auto body dudes that lost their ass thinking they would be like every other automaker. They have all since stopped doing work on Teslas.
nomilkabout 1 hour ago
Why did it fail? I remember seeing the launch announcement for SolarCity and being wowed (logic: every house needs a roof, so why not make the roof from solar tiles instead of regular tiles and get free energy).

I guess the unit-economics didn’t work? (but seems like a good thing to have tried given the massive TAM)

torlok28 minutes ago
Solar Roof was vaporware when it was presented by Musk. It was blatant fraud. There's no "free energy" here. The roof was way more expensive than a regular roof covered in solar panels.
pavlovabout 1 hour ago
A solar energy product from Tesla was an odd fit with the CEO’s anti-environmentalist MAGA stance anyway.
torlok25 minutes ago
The reason Tesla acquired SolarCity was to bail Musk out. Same as xAI, and then SpaceX, bailed out his Twitter purchase.
fortran77about 1 hour ago
You're right! It is odd that someone who makes electrical storage and electrical cars would be interested in solar PV, too.
JKCalhounabout 1 hour ago
"…Tesla installed only about 3,000 Solar Roof systems across the US, peaking at just 21 to 32 installations a week — more than 95% short of Elon Musk’s repeated promise of 1,000 weekly installations by 2019-2020."

What was he smoking? (Oh, never mind that.) I mean was he expecting Federal tax incentives/rebates for installing solar to create that demand for 1,000/week?

(Or perhaps I should ask what were all these contractors smoking that thought it was a good idea to sink $100K of their money to go into business pedaling his wares?)

pessimizerabout 1 hour ago
Seems very related to another electrek story today: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49599058 If a Tesla Cybercab fleet were profitable, Tesla wouldn’t sell you one

They seem to just be laying downside risk off onto suckers, and holding on to upside. They probably broke even on the Solar Roof project, while their contractors are ruined.

One arbitrary day they could bail on cybercabs just as easily, probably walk away having made a pile of money anyway, while a bunch of people are stuck with a bunch of used up vehicles that they have to try and sell, and can only sell with the consent of Tesla itself.

Great model. Good followup on "do things that the state should be doing so the state pays you a ton of money, then have a luxury version of the same thing that you sell to wealthy customers (whose tech has been entirely subsidized by the state.)"

Musk's empire is a purely financial play that has nothing to do with tech, just like Palantir. It's all money games, like everything else in the West. Scam age.

elzbardicoabout 2 hours ago
It was incredibly badly engineered product, sold in a stupid way.
Gee101about 1 hour ago
Why was it badly engineered?
fooblasterabout 1 hour ago
The entire premise is stupid. Panels need to be large to have reduced install costs and wiring costs. Install costs dominate solar install pricing in the United states. It is far far cheaper to install a new roof and giant solar installation than to go with a solar roof. It's just a broken concept at the very start.
iugtmkbdfil834about 1 hour ago
Was going to so ask the same. As much as I dislike Tesla and its products, I can't take away its value proposition ( good integration and simplicity for end user ).
kingleopold39 minutes ago
costs made ROI very low, that comes to my mind
Advertisement
formvoltronabout 1 hour ago
The museum that is being built currently in Louisiana will dwarf all this sort of thing for decades to come.
dekhnabout 1 hour ago
Business has risk.
kls0eabout 1 hour ago
"Why wouldn't you?"
shevy-javaabout 1 hour ago
Do not become dependent on corporations run by egoistic billionaires.
riquettistudioabout 1 hour ago
I hate how big companies always have the power to screw up the workers.
7eabout 1 hour ago
Musk’e fraudulent bailout of Solar City (and himself) reaches its conclusion.
georgemcbayabout 1 hour ago
> Musk’e fraudulent bailout of Solar City (and himself) reaches its conclusion.

Nothing ever really ends, he's just higher up in the stack now fraudulently bailing out everything below with SpaceX.