Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

60% Positive

Analyzed from 1697 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#car#more#byd#chinese#cars#still#vehicles#price#public#transport

Discussion (68 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

grahar64about 2 hours ago
In NZ there are BYDs everywhere. Why are they not in US yet?
tancopabout 2 hours ago
Because American auto makers convinced the government that BYD is price dumping in every market segment at the same time and somehow staying profitable.
legitster42 minutes ago
But I mean, they are.

The Chinese government is effectively giving all manufacturers 0% financing and raw materials at cost.

And even still, BYD executives have come out and said their pricing is not sustainable. The Chinese market is engaging in a massive price war and BYD's strategy is to entrench themselves in new markets with "aggressive" introductory pricing campaigns.

xethos41 minutes ago
Not to say you're wrong, but BYD could still be price dumping in several markets, while being quietly propped up by the Chinese government. I'm not convinced that's the case, but it's still possible.

The kind of corporate-socialism that would allow a government to dump cash into an otherwise uncompetitive domestic automotive manufacturer to keep it afloat though, is more an American thing. If American auto manufacturers are right, and BYD is receiving government help, the hypocrisy would be nearly unbelievable

jpollockabout 2 hours ago
Tariffs, the tariff on Chinese vehicles is 100%.
Haven880about 1 hour ago
America now bans Chinese stuff. Some Chinese carmakers are explicitly banned in USA.
burnt-resistor41 minutes ago
Also, every car manufacturer has to go through crash testing and homologation in order to sell cars directly to US consumers. And, without a parts supply chain, maintaining a car becomes very difficult. So even paying 200-300% over the sale price with third-party homologation makes private importation expensive, painful, and slow.
hdgvhicvabout 2 hours ago
Freedom
usrnmabout 2 hours ago
Didn't Americans send all their freedom to Iran?
burner420042about 2 hours ago
You mean the state of Iran?
Ylpertnodiabout 2 hours ago
Yes, and now they're running out.
bestouffabout 2 hours ago
So now Iran with their freedom ?
red75primeabout 2 hours ago
Freedom from those pesky car manufacturers that demand protection of domestic workforce?
ballon_monkeyabout 2 hours ago
No they arent? See BYD for sure, but see most other brands more often still.
wpmabout 2 hours ago
Regulatory capture, legalized bribery whoops I mean political donations, and protectionism. Gotta let Detroit keep making crappy bro-dozers that get 15MPG.
3848485858about 2 hours ago
just destroy your industrial base and become fully dependent on china bro
Boss0565about 2 hours ago
The average American's longest-kept car is 8 years old. Therefore every eight years or so, Americans are forced to spend a significant amount of money on a car. The median price of a new car in the United States is ~$41,000. If we generously claim that a Chinese car with the same capabilities could be purchased for minimum $30,000 instead, then the number of money being lost to being forced to purchase a more expensive car, every eight years, is 11,000*350 million, or ~3.8 trillion dollars. Dividing per year, we get roughly 480 billion dollars per year that could be spent by Americans.

I'm not an economist nor a mathematician, so I will not claim that this is a good expression of the economic impact of these restrictions. But I will say that the average American does not care about which country his or her car originates from. They care about navigating our crumbling infrastructure through the only means possible, the car. We have no reliable public transport in 99% of this country nor alternative modes of transport. We are forced to buy cars.

It seems unfair to me that the average American, who is making less and less per year after we adjust for inflation and purchasing power, should be forced to carry the burden of a technologically backwards industry that is still pumping out millions of gas-powered vehicles, which are not only bad for the environment, but are even more expensive to operate compared to the cost of electric cars per mile.

Our country does not think ahead, all of our decisions just temporarily patch our longstanding issues. America is screwed.

Incipient43 minutes ago
I don't think tbis quite holds - money being spent on domestically produced vehicles should be going to working families, so the money stays and is spent again in the country. Now if most of that money just goes to the mega rich, then it's fairly pointless.

But it's definitely more complex than just money saved = money spent elsewhere

Haven880about 1 hour ago
America voted for it.
pantalaimonabout 2 hours ago
Same reason they are not in EU, tarrifs.
tzsabout 2 hours ago
They are in the EU. The tariff is 27% so they aren't as numerous as they would be without it but there are still plenty.

There will probably be a lot more starting next year since they are building a factory in the EU which is scheduled to start production at the end of this year. That bypasses tariffs.

SapporoChrisabout 2 hours ago
"BYD faces a 17% tariff on imported electric vehicles in EU, in addition to the standard 10% base rate."

"BYD has sold 19,241 fully electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles in Europe last month, a 255% soar from the same period a year ago."

Small numbers, but I am pretty sure they're in Europe. https://eletric-vehicles.com/byd/byd-sales-in-europe-more-th...

Edited: Tariffs vary across Europe, particularly in non EU nations.

NorwegianDudeabout 2 hours ago
There is no fixed tariff in Europe like you are quoting. It varies.
unglaublichabout 2 hours ago
It’s so annoying that the EU is artificially hampering EV adoption to protect their outdated fossil fuel car manufacturers.
mhw11about 1 hour ago
Tariffs can’t stop “technology” and “manufacturing.”
Ylpertnodiabout 2 hours ago
I see many in my part of the eu.
yen223about 1 hour ago
When they say cheapest, they mean cheapest new car including petrol cars.

I have no idea why ICE cars are so pricey nowadays here.

jscycabout 2 hours ago
That's a pretty stunning price. For context I was looking at a second hand 2018 Nissan Leaf (grey import here in Australia) a couple weeks ago for 20k.
motionlessvelocabout 2 hours ago
Non-video story: https://thedriven.io/2026/09/16/australias-cheapest-new-car-...

TL;DR: AUD 19,900 driveway (means taxes, registration etc included), or about US$14k. The main limitation is the 220 km (135 mi) range, which is fine for a city runabout but not great for road tripping.

Raed667about 2 hours ago
That's an insane price and the range is fine for the daily needs of the large majority of people.

€12k in France (where i am) can't get you any new car, even the cheapest ICE Dacia is more expensive than that now.

chvidabout 2 hours ago
The BYD is sold in Europe but there is higher VAT and a special EU Chinese car import tax - so these cars are about 20k euro.

There is also the Renault Twingo which is in the same class.

pantalaimonabout 2 hours ago
The tax is only on electric cars, vehicles with a combustion engine are excempt - that's why you see all those ads for BYD Hybrids now.
Raed667about 2 hours ago
I checked the Twingo and it is starting at €16k and an Opel Corsa (without any options) is more than €19k
Nursieabout 2 hours ago
Australia doesn’t tariff Chinese car imports, on account of no longer having any car industry of our own to defend.

That said we do still have a hefty “luxury car tax” for anything over $80k, which is a hangover from when there was an industry here. The government aren’t going to lift that any time soon.

Its current function is to select for expensive trucks over expensive sedans, because trucks are “commercial” and exempt, making our roads less safe overall. Thanks government.

mnscabout 2 hours ago
So you are saying that there's a widespread problem with people looking to buy a car for $100k but realizing there's a $6k tax they go, "I can't afford that" and instead buy a unsafe truck?
burnt-resistor35 minutes ago
Range isn't a big issue in recent generation BYD vehicles that support FLASH Charging in areas that have 1.5MW chargers.
rwbtabout 2 hours ago
I'd love a city run around car inclusive of all taxes for $15k or less.
hdgvhicvabout 2 hours ago
I bought a 4 year old leaf with 25k on the clock in May for £7k ($10k). Get about 150 miles on a full charge. I’d rather a little more as I tend to do 90 a day, so if it doesn’t charge offpeak overnight for some reason I’m left with a manual recharge during the day. But I do a lot of miles (25k a year)

The main downside on long trips is the DC is chamedo, not standard ccs, so there are fewer locations and they are sometimes broken or full.

Nursieabout 2 hours ago
It’s pretty tiny too, so not a road trip car IMHO.

That said, coupled with home solar to power it, this is a very cheap way to get on the road and I will likely go this direction in future - one of these for the city and something a bit bigger/more rugged to go bush once in a while.

defrostabout 2 hours ago
> a bit bigger/more rugged to go bush once in a while.

Depends whether you're taking the Birdsville track or the Bibbulmun track really.

The shorter one can be done a on a red postie bike, the longer one won't even need that :-)

Nursieabout 2 hours ago
Been thinking more along the lines of the Munda-biddy actually :)

But I haven’t got on my bike for a few years now because at the moment all my spare energy goes on managing our plot. There’s always something needs moving, sawing, building, repairing, digging… So I’ve gone from having a (pudgy) cyclist’s physique with very strong calves to more of a farmer’s build with bigger arm and shoulder muscles than I’ve ever had before and a big ‘ol belly.

But in all seriousness I also like to go remote once in a while and access national parks. I’m not going to be hooning it round destroying dunes, but getting to beautiful places like Cape Peron is tough without a the right vehicle.

rightnutwingjobabout 2 hours ago
$20k for the car plus $5k for roof top solar, plus $500,000 for the house to put it on.

Or: a $2000 Corolla and the rental home you’re already in.

dbetteridgeabout 2 hours ago
500k doesn't get you much house in Australia these days, try double that.
luipugsabout 2 hours ago
$500,000? That's just the price for the garage.
andrew_lettuceabout 2 hours ago
That's great if you already have a clean, high mileage Corolla or Accord, but good luck finding one for 2k
Nursieabout 2 hours ago
I’m not in a rental home, and wouldn’t be anyway.

I want solar and a battery (don’t have it yet, it’s on the list) to cut my energy bills and guard against power cuts anyway.

So neither of these things is an ‘extra’ expense for me getting a small EV.

There are a total of 5 corollas available in Australia for $2k or less. Each one is ratty, beat up and 19+ years old, I wouldn’t want to chance taking any of them on the freeway, and you’d still have to fuel them.

feverzsjabout 1 hour ago
Made by extremely overworked and underpaid workers. For either moral or safety reason, you shouldn't buy them.
crote40 minutes ago
Rather the opposite, actually.

With the rising living standards and a looming population cliff due to the one-child-policy wages in China have steadily been rising - and they'll get even higher in the future. Any Chinese industry relying on cheap and mostly-unskilled labor is in serious trouble. They know this, which is why they have been heavily pushing for automation. As a result, companies like BYD have been setting up "dark factories" for a while now.

Want cars made by overworked and underpaid workers? These days that means buying American.

einszweiabout 1 hour ago
The irony of your comment is that these chinese evs are made by some of the most heavily automated manufacturing lines. (Not disputing that there are exploited workers here)

But I hope you aren't buying any phones, laptops which indeed have lot of exploitation and sometimes even slave labour (see cobalt mining in DRC). Or not buying any supermarket meat, eggs or milk. It is incredibly easy to pass a moralistic judgement.

Incipient39 minutes ago
Not disagreeing with you, but also two wrongs don't make a right. Just because someone else, or someone does 'thing A' that's disagreeable, doesn't mean doing 'thing B' becomes fine.
xbmcuserabout 2 hours ago
With free electricity bring offered in the afternoon because of excess solar would be a great car for most peoples daily commute cheaper even than public transport as this is less than $6 per day over 10 years
batisteoabout 2 hours ago
This is sad news, city have to get rid of cars, and make public transport free if needed
jscycabout 1 hour ago
I agree with you but the Opal fares in Sydney are more expensive than it would cost me in tolls driving across the bridge and paying for parking at work. I still don't often drive but it's not because PT is more economical.
clivedupabout 2 hours ago
Cheaper EVs is a good thing.

Australia is more than cities.

Cities can make public transport free and congestion charges if they want to reduce usage of cars.

TomK32about 2 hours ago
Australia is one of the most urbanized countries in the world with 87% of its population living in cities and suburbs. Being car dependent is a political choice pushed by the car industry for decades. Getting people into public transports, onto bicycles or their two feet requires reducing the vast space cities waste on privately owned cars. Super blocks that focus on active travel, less surface parking space and slower speeds are what is needed.
nujabeabout 2 hours ago
I don’t think congestion charges would cover building/maintaining public transport.
Incipient41 minutes ago
Yeah we have too much urban sprawl, and too few people, to justify widespread public transport to eliminate the need for a household car (in Australia).
yen22317 minutes ago
we can electrify our cars and build public transport simultaneously!
throw3xabout 2 hours ago
Never buy Chinese electric vehicles. they won not last more than couple of years. what a waste