Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

0% Positive

Analyzed from 185 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#launch#radiator#watts#square#meter#don#yet#another#space#spacex

Discussion (8 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

zactato•26 minutes ago
How are they solving the heat dissipation issues?
xnx•10 minutes ago
No solution, but that is the crux of the problem. They probably need to make a radiator that 1000x smaller and lighter.

TPU: 100,000+ watts/square-meter

Radiator: ~300 watts/square-meter

https://youtu.be/ktdbUIZKeSE?t=76

JackSlateur•5 minutes ago
That's the neat part: you don't (ergo, this is yet another marketing crap)
GMoromisato•about 1 hour ago
If data centers in space end up being economically viable, then I don't see how anyone can catch SpaceX. They are ten years ahead in both launch capability and satellite manufacturing.
10xDev•about 3 hours ago
And just like that Elon Musk shifted the overton window away from "unthinkable" on yet another topic.
GMoromisato•about 1 hour ago

  It's physically impossible
  It's technically impossible
  It won't be profitable          <= You are here
  It's bad for the environment
  It needs to be nationalized
This is just a joke, obviously, but the debate over on ArsTechnica about Falcon 9 going away is all about how it needs to be nationalized.
zactato•25 minutes ago
I think one of the reasons for putting these in space is to move them beyond the borders of any national control.
GMoromisato•5 minutes ago
You can't launch from the US without the federal government giving you permission. And SpaceX does not have (nor are they planning) any launch pads outside the US. [And because of ITAR, I'm not even sure they'd be allowed to build one.]

However, I do think avoiding local control (state/city permits) is a reason for this.