Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

71% Positive

Analyzed from 351 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#paid#free#getting#more#someone#lot#better#things#yourself#open

Discussion (12 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

szmarczakabout 2 hours ago
SVGs on Firefox are broken (like 0.1% of the size it needs to be).
brcmthrowawayabout 3 hours ago
This really shouldn't be free work.
jeffbeeabout 2 hours ago
Why not though? The entirety of the LLVM project is available to them, and you, for free, as is the RISC-V ISA itself. A lot of people are getting a lot of value from free and open software, and they may feel their contributions are in a like spirit.
Jyaifabout 2 hours ago
Folks that do this work for "free" do it because they enjoy it.

And a small observation: if you require money to do something, you usually have no chance of being as good as the folks that do it for the pleasure.

cjbgkaghabout 2 hours ago
I would suggest that’s an availability bias, those who do it for free are more likely to blog about it.

There is a common distinction between professional and amateur with the former getting paid for their work. In general there is an understanding that someone getting paid can focus and do it full time and are expected to be better than someone who does it as a hobby.

Perhaps coding is an unusual space where the best coders are often misfits who have a hard time holding down a job.

jcalvinowens24 minutes ago
> In general there is an understanding that someone getting paid can focus and do it full time and are expected to be better than someone who does it as a hobby.

For something like flying airplanes, I think this is obviously true: nobody can afford to spend the required hours doing it unless somebody else is paying for the airplane, and the only way that happens is if that person is your employer. A lot of things are like that.

But programming is very different, it requires almost no resources to practice except your time. You can sit at home in your pajamas with $1K worth of hardware and keep yourself busy for a lifetime through open source. Of course, you can also spend a lifetime building useless sandcastles while telling yourself you're a genius: you have to find ways to hold yourself accountable to grow.

I've been fortunate to get paid to work on some interesting things... but the work I do for fun is, on average, ~100x more challenging and interesting than the work I'm paid to do. I would be a much much less capable programmer if I'd only done work I was paid to do for the past decade.

I wouldn't go so far as to say "amateurs are better than professionals", but I think the skill level of the two groups is much more blurred in programming than in most other things.

luqtasabout 1 hour ago
i think you need to understand more about modern software infrastructure [0]

[0] https://www.fordfoundation.org/learning/library/research-rep...

kubbabout 2 hours ago
Sure but then they have to waste time working for money, rather than doing God’s work.