HI version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
53% Positive
Analyzed from 2402 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#iran#internet#file#https#system#blackout#data#more#regime#video
Discussion (51 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
Interesting read but that part really made me question my own sanity. It’s probably just lost in translation.
It is not wrong that you can have a file (bits and bytes encoded in the shape described by a file format) on some remote point. If you have an index of those files where you can programmatically choose between multiple files that could even pass as a crude "file system". But I doubt this is what they meant to refer to.
It is likelier they wrongly assumed a file system is the system in which a file is organized, where in fact they meant file format.
The same set of people behind that project were supposedly given additional resources to smuggle Starlinks inside, and in the Persian community on Twitter, there's an ongoing meme mocking where those Starlinks actually went and given to whom, never to get an answer...
[1]: TLDR: data archive within DVB-S video stream
Of course not. From the article:
Because the technology is banned by the government, access remains limited and carries risk; Iranian authorities have recently arrested Starlink users and sellers.
I expect not to be honest.
Not saying the cause is wrong necessarily but let's just call a spade a spade - this is aimed to help one side and one side only, "freedom" has nothing to do with it
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/455...
That said, I'm sure CCP is spending more than enough to make sure Americans get its propaganda, so I wouldn't be too worried if I were in your shoes.
Truth is the first casualty of war, yet truth is required to operate a democracy effectively. Responsible citizens will do their best to see through the fog of war by aggregating multiple perspectives.
I acknowledge governments do not see things the same way.
This is the framing used by the IR regime* in Iran and a moment's reflection makes it clear it is complete nonsense. Mass scale propaganda in Iran is delivered via satelite channels. Iran Inernational, BBC Persian, ..., are all accessible in Iran.
The blackout by IR regime is preventing Iranians from letting us, the rest of the world, learn what actually happened during the massacres earlier this year, get the actual facts about the number killed, the manner of regime crackdown, the nationalities of the (invited) paramlitaries from neighboring lands involved in mowing down unarmed civilians, testimonials from families regarding the treatment given to their loved ones, what they are put through to get the bodies of their dead loved ones, what condition they receive the bodies of their loved ones, and what pressures and evils they endure to bury their loved ones.
p.s. right now, with the almost two months of blackout, they only information sources we have are either regime flunkies and "professors" or obvious contra regime propaganda outlets like Iran International. And reasonable non-Iranians would likely have reservations about info delivered by an outfit like Iran International. Whereas if we could hear from civil society in IR occupied Iran, from prominent individuals, organizations, trade groups, universities, ...., then it would be completely impossible for the IR in Iran to mislead regarding the horrors they inflicted on Iranians.
* Preemptive note: They, the Shia of Khomeini, themselves refer to their system as "nezaam" which means precisely and exactly "regime".
One would think this is exactly the sort of circumstances under which store-and-forward/delay-tolerant routing would be useful. Years before Jack Dorsey thought of bitchat[0] I had the same idea, but never pursued it because I live in a western country but not in a "tech city", in other words, nobody around here is interested in being an early adopter of an app primarily of use only to preppers or people living under repressive authoritarian regimes.
Anyways, it's a great idea in theory, as the techno-anarchist preppers that LARP with off-the-shelf lilygo LoRa tranceivers will be happy to tell you. But in practice nobody who actually could benefit from these seems to adopt these things. Or at least I never hear about it, if they indeed do. Perhaps today's internet blackouts are too transient for a 2026 version of samizdat to develop?
Do the people you know inside Iran plan to just wait it out, or do they have some other solution ready for a total blackout?
[0] https://bitchat.free/
There are some government-sanctioned messengers that apparently keep working but some people would not use it as they are completely insecure and watched by big brother, of course. The biggest issue is getting data out of the country not internal comms (e.g. video evidence of massacre, for example, so that some poeple like in this very thread don't get the ammo to whitewash the regime, intentionally or accidentally.)
No doubt. Unless there's somebody friendly just across the border in Azerbaijan or Basrah or something, I don't see how they'd do it. Maybe point a dish and establish a point to point link, but you'd need to pre-arrange that.
Too busy surviving to blog.
I dont think that helps that much. If you have satalite tv going in, you already have video coming in, are arbitrary files really that much more useful?
The thing people really want internet communication for is 2 way coms. Getting info on the situation on the ground out and allowing different groups inside Iran to coordinate. I fail to see how this helps with that.
Which is neither new nor novel.
PlayCable was doing this to download console games over analog cable systems <checks notes> 46 years ago.
TeleText says hello.
Teletext [1] was extremely popular in Europe before the Internet was widely available for private households. Also piggybacked on TV.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teletext
It is true that shutting off your Internet prevents cyber-attacks, but imagine if it happened in the USA: it would effectively shut down much of our commerce and everyday living activities. In the West, Internet access is becoming more of an essential utility than the icing on the cake, or a recreational forum for malcontents and ne'er-do-wells. Or perhaps it's both at once.
[1]: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/6/has-trump-confirmed-...
Now having said that, given the nature of the Iranian theocracy, they are quite capable of such acts. Remember that they have hanged homosexuals from cranes,[3] and executed rape victims.[4] But 30,000 in two days [5] is an extraordinary claim which requires more evidence, certainly more than circular references tracing back to just one source.
[1] https://thegrayzone.com/2026/02/01/guardian-iranian-death-to...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Asgari_and_Ayaz_Marhon...
[4] https://www.timesnownews.com/lifestyle/people/crime-against-...
[5] https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601255198
Edit: added [5]
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2026/01/what-hap...
The fact that your account is only used to comment about Iran is also weird.
The number was given over two days, not one.
The protests were in over 200 cities with 5 million+ participants, WE KNOW they fired live rounds this is undeniable if you only had 200 deaths per city you would reach a death toll north of 40k already. Yes it's not verified yes there isnt a video of exactly 30000 identifiable bodies side by side. But the number really isnt as unachievable as people make it out to be.
From another article: The 30,000 figure is also far beyond tallies being compiled by activists methodically assigning names to the dead. As of Saturday, the U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency said it had confirmed 5,459 deaths and is investigating 17,031 more.
https://www.aol.com/articles/iran-protest-death-toll-could-1...
The mass murdering of 5,400 people is nothing to scoff at, on any level, even over two days.
Was it? I can’t find that in the linked article. The source for the ~7,000 deaths linked near the only instance of “30,000” says it was over the first fifty days.
https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601255198
For clarity 3,900 tons over four raids and 1,500 planes.
I’m not sure how to translate that into modern munitions but I’m also uncertain why a strategic bombing death toll should tell us anything about Iranian protester deaths. Iran isn’t doing strategic bombing of their citizens, they’re using small arms across hundreds of locations.
The linked article cites a source [1] with detailed methodology for their actual claim of 7,000 deaths and mentions that other unmentioned sources claim it could go as high as 30,000. I don’t see any claim of that being in a single day.
Given the timeframe and widespread nature of these protests it doesn’t seem implausible.
[1]: https://www.en-hrana.org/the-crimson-winter-a-50-day-record-...
Or the Babi Yar massacre, where 33,771 Jews were murdered over the course of two days, by approximately 300 to 500 SS and German policemen.
A bit disappointing TBH if that is their solution. Seems like everything is trying to pigeon hole everyone into the proof of work scenario. If we have more power/energy then we will beat you in everything security, coding and censorship circumvention.