Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 423 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#css#selectors#xpath#https#php#dom#nice#things#pyastgrep#syntax

Discussion (12 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

k1mabout 2 hours ago
I find CSS selectors a lot easier to write than XPath. I recently gave a talk on how PHP's new DOM API makes working with HTML and CSS selectors natively very easy (previously you had to convert CSS to XPath).[1]

It's a shame that because CSS is still primarily for browser use and styling, we don't get nice things like the ability to select based on text content like we can with XPath. My understanding is that this was proposed but didn't make it into the spec because it could lead to performance issues in a browser rendering context.

[1] https://speakerdeck.com/keyvan/parsing-html-with-php-8-dot-4...

zerocratesabout 2 hours ago
Yeah, querySelector/querySelectorAll are totally widespread in client-side, it's nice to finally have them in PHP's newer DOM. Definitely what people are used to doing.
werdnapkabout 1 hour ago
document.evaluate is also widespread client-side.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document/ev...

spookylukeyabout 1 hour ago
The project pyastgrep https://pyastgrep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ can use CSS selectors as a query language for Python syntax (default is XPath).

e.g.:

pyastgrep --css 'Call > func > Name#main'

evncabout 1 hour ago
oh this is neat! Feels like exactly the sort of thing I was gesturing towards. Thanks :)
duncanfwalkerabout 1 hour ago
Reminds me of seeing this presented at a conference years ago https://github.com/braposo/graphql-css

It was a joke but I really like the way it pointed out how we copy and reapply patterns in different contexts and that might enable unexpected things.

evnc41 minutes ago
oh this is fun

> we copy and reapply patterns in different contexts and that might enable unexpected things

yeah, that's exactly what I am trying to do here. Mostly it doesn't go anywhere, but it's interesting for the hacker spirit within me :)

efortisabout 2 hours ago
Not sure I follow the scenario this would solve.

For instance, currently you can conditionally change a parent based on its children. For example, this `pre` could either have 16px or 0px of padding. Zero when its direct child is a `code` element.

  pre {
    padding: 16px;

    &:has(> code) {
      padding: 0;
    }
  }
tadfisherabout 1 hour ago
The article describes a syntax for modifying the underlying data (adding new child elements or attributes to the DOM) for matching selectors, not resolving style changes in a single pass like you've shown.
capitainenemoabout 1 hour ago
I suspect they are replying to this part of the article: "What you actually want to say is: “an element is effectively-dark if it has data-theme=”dark”, or if it has an effectively-dark ancestor with no effectively-light ancestor in between.” That’s a recursive relational definition. CSS cannot express it. CSSLog can:"

The entire article doesn't seem to mention the existence of :has() which is rather surprising given how recently it was written. Not even in the footnotes.

evnc43 minutes ago
tbh, this started as a connection of two disparate ideas ("hey, this thing looks like this other thing"), and then just kind of explores it in different directions.

I think the conclusion (which I may not have made clear enough) is less like "These are limitations of modern CSS which ought to be fixed" and more "Maybe a CSS-like syntax could be added to a Datalog-like system and that would be helpful for making it more accessible to more engineers, navigating tree-shaped data, etc"

thanks for the feedback, anyway!

securityTalent36 minutes ago
Nice