Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

89% Positive

Analyzed from 882 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#data#centers#more#damage#where#heat#center#ping#probably#state

Discussion (27 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

time0utabout 3 hours ago
Data centers are such great targets in modern warfare. A few cheap drones can inflict billions in damage with low direct casualties (if the attacker even cares). I have heard AWS in particular is secretive about the exact location of their data centers, but no doubt every major country knows exactly where they are.
cheney_2004about 1 hour ago
Which is why peace and diplomacy is so important. The last thing we need is to be war hardening everything, which is likely impossible in this day and age.
croisillon35 minutes ago
your handle tho :D
jmalickiabout 2 hours ago
Just look on satellites for giant buildings with no cars or semi trailers parked in the parking lots.

I wonder if data centers will have to start doubling as automobile junkyards to conceal themselves.

throwaway894345about 1 hour ago
Some Paris data centers are disguised as apartment buildings with the classic Hausmannian facade, and then you open up Google maps and see a ton of AC units stacked on the roof. These aren’t likely major cloud data centers mind you, and the motivation for concealing them has more to do with the city’s aesthetic codes than military defense.
fvdessen42 minutes ago
That's why the SWIFT backup data centers in Belgium are camouflaged as posh villas (or so i've heard)
cute_boiabout 3 hours ago
I wonder if you can uncover where the data center is just by using ping command.
yabonesabout 2 hours ago
It could give you a rough idea, but it's far from precise. The delay added by a single router could throw you off by several KM.

It's much more effective to just go through satellite imagery and land title records.

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=0.01+ms+at+speed+of+lig...

tcp_handshakerabout 2 hours ago
>> I wonder if you can uncover where the data center is just by using ping command.

Not exactly, but you can uncover cloud providers like Google and Azure, who forget to tell you, their "availability zones" are in the same data center ;-)

jmalickiabout 1 hour ago
As long as they're on opposite sides so the same Shahed missile doesn't hit them both.
sophaclesabout 2 hours ago
You can find data centers by looking for hvac units in satellite photos.
hirako2000about 2 hours ago
You can make a few phone calls. Maintenance is not avoidable until boston dynamics figure out how to clean the toilets at least.
Ekarosabout 2 hours ago
Probably also grid connections like size of transformers and if there is prominent number of trucks going in and out.
fragmedeabout 2 hours ago
That's some of how geolocation works. Ping can't go faster than the speed of light, so that gives you a circle for where something is. Ping from enough places and you can get a good enough idea, if you're the Iranian Guard or otherwise.
kdheiwnsabout 2 hours ago
Big tech's love for cheap labor is a great mechanism for finding where all their most valuable assets are and mapping out any and all vulnerabilities. I imagine state actors are applying to any and all low paying jobs that have seemingly juicy job requirements and feeling out details during interviews. Even better if you offer to accept a salary far below standard rates and actually get the job.

While probably not a state agent, I've personally done online interviews with some people that were clearly lying about everything and trying to feel out details about the company. People claiming to live in our country and being citizens but having little ability with the language, saying they would love to come to our city but it's a bit far, saying they graduated from a major university but being unable to describe anything about the town (with their resume mentioning graduating from a different university, and their LinkedIn a different university from either), random people moving around and arguing in the background, all their work was with random crypto businesses that shut down within months. I had to stop my coworkers from saying too much. I had to convince them why hiring that person for remote work and giving them access to our servers was a bad idea. There are without a doubt companies giving similar people physical access to their hardware. And there are undoubtedly people who practice interviewing to better deceive companies.

walrus01about 2 hours ago
You can be secretive all you want, but it's extremely difficult to hide massive heat exchanging systems and/or generators from aerial/space photography. Particularly at the scale of an AWS-like datacenter.

Building a fully camouflaged datacenter could be done at much greater cost, but you still can't hide its thermal emissions from infrared. Basically every watt hour used in a datacenter environment turns into waste heat ultimately rejected into the atmosphere (except for the 0.000000001% that leaves the facility as photons down a fiber), so if you have N megawatts of waste heat from a rectangular shaped building located on a 300 x 400 meter sized plot of land, it's going to stand out.

s1mplicissimusabout 1 hour ago
Wouldn't it be possible to pipe away the heat to the next city and use it as heating there? That way the heat emissions wouldn't be as noticeable
jmalickiabout 1 hour ago
> except for the 0.000000001% that leaves the facility as photons down a fiber

Realistically you're getting photons returned too.

throwaway894345about 1 hour ago
Geothermal exists, but you would have to take care to design accordingly and even then there are plenty of other ways for a state actor to locate you. It probably doesn’t make much sense to spend money trying to hide from state actors; it’s probably better to (1) avoid conflict prone areas to the extent possible and (2) make it expensive for an attacker to shut you down (use more smaller data centers within a sensitive region, put some of them underground, etc) or (3) accept the risk of data center disruption.
logickkk1about 2 hours ago
"Stops billing" makes it sound generous. If those regions can't run customer apps, not charging for them is just the minimum.
pwarner18 minutes ago
IDK your S3 data may be fine, they're still incurring the cost to store it on those drives - even if they're buried in rubble /s
nerdsniperabout 3 hours ago
I'm surprised this reportedly only affected 19 server racks. Some of the small FPV quadcopter strikes I've seen videos of have collapsed entire homes. Even if the structure is more resilient than a fragile home, I would have expected the blast from a larger long-range drone like a Shahed to damage more server racks than that.
bluegattyabout 2 hours ago
It's either 100lb or 100Kg, with a direct hit on a dense centre, it would damage a lot of racks, but if it's oblique, or indirect, impartial, the damage could be less pronounced. They could also be misrepresenting by diminishing the damage as there's a lot of information suppression going on.
downrightmikeabout 3 hours ago
The sheer amount of metal on every rack makes DCs very dense
juliusceasarabout 2 hours ago
Thanks 2nd Epstein War for all the fuck up in the world.
2ndorderthought36 minutes ago
It had to have been cheaper to just pay more in taxes then this outcome.