Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

92% Positive

Analyzed from 2603 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#nethack#game#play#played#years#https#still#ago#great#spoilers

Discussion (69 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

forestoabout 3 hours ago
Last time I played, after many close calls, I finally got my hands on the amulet. Knowing that the journey back to daylight was likely to be at least as dangerous as the way I had come, I took a breath, saved, and set the game aside.

That was about seventeen years ago. I still have the save file. Today's announcement got me excited about the prospect of finally finishing my game, until I saw this:

> Existing saved games and bones files will not work with NetHack 5.0.0.

Drat.

Thankfully, NetHack is not one of those modern, commercial, online-only games that make it difficult to run old versions.

** SPOILER BELOW ** (in someone's reply to me)

tetha39 minutes ago
I also have a Dungeon Crawl: Stone Soup with my first 3 runes around somewhere.

I'm aware I will probably lose it, but I'm also anxious to touch it. Maybe I should just get myself some good coffee tomorrow and get over with it. Biggest learning of that save is also how careful and defensive you have to play if you want to consistently get further.

saulpwabout 3 hours ago
> The build-time "yacc and lex"-based level compiler, the "yacc and lex"-based dungeon compiler, and the quest text file processing previously done by NetHack's "makedefs" utility, have been replaced with Lua text alternatives that are loaded and processed by the game during play.

This is very likely a good choice for multiple reasons, but it's truly the end of an era. (NetHack predates Lua, which has been around since 1993.) Lex and yacc are dead, long live lex and yacc!

anthk23 minutes ago
Lua is not on base on most distros, that's sad. Also it stops being as portable.

By Amiga 68k platforms then. And maybe DOS.

Also, there no official Nethack i686 builds.

If I were them I'd try some micro-language from https://t3x.org as a pre-processor and bundle it. The T3X0 language itself can do wonders and even be ported to DOS with ease.

EDIT: ok, Lua can be portable and even they got DOS ports, this is great.

bhaak4 minutes ago
There are also official Amiga binaries. :)

The Amiga port was resurrected just a few weeks ago.

https://mastodon.social/@ipaschke@cyberplace.social/11625728...

haunterabout 3 hours ago
I can highly recommend the 3D client especially because it works almost everywhere, hope it will be updated for 5.0.0 soon

https://github.com/JamesIV4/nethack-3d

Web https://jamesiv4.github.io/nethack-3d/

f3408fh6 minutes ago
As someone whose first introduction to dungeon crawler was Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup (with tiles), thank you! I just tried the 3D version and it runs very well.
SubiculumCodeabout 1 hour ago
By 3D I had supposed you meant 1st person. This seems as good as the other 2D graphics mods, fine if it's your thing. I've always preferred the chars.
pimeysabout 2 hours ago
I don't know... I played Nethack 30 years ago a lot and always felt all the graphical updates were not worth it. There's something when you can easily see the whole map in one screen. And that scary pink h appears suddenly...

Edit: but to be fair, I will try this 3d version.

Der_Einzigeabout 1 hour ago
Is it possible to access wizard mode on the web version? I suppose I could just clone it and run locally and implement it if not, but would be nice if it's already there to know how to trigger it.
brittaabout 3 hours ago
Aw yeah! I’d love to see somebody from the DevTeam talk about this, or literally anything else they might want to talk about, at the Roguelike Celebration in October (https://www.roguelike.club/), if anyone has a connection and could encourage them to consider it. It’s a super lovely community-run online event, and everyone would be thrilled. (I was a volunteer for the first few annual events, as a person who played about a zillion games of Nethack as a kid.)
dansalvatoabout 3 hours ago
Wow, what a delightful surprise! I'm a huge NetHack fan and have been waiting a long time for the official 3.7 release before switching over to it. I've been a 3.6 holdout, haha.

AFAIK, the backend has moved a lot of map generation logic (and exposure of other data) to a Lua API, which is quite exciting as something for people to play with in tooling, forks, mods, etc.

Minor spoilers below:

I heard about some great balance adjustments that help to mitigate over-reliance on a single kit, such as making certain extrinsic resistances (e.g. wearing rings) stronger than their intrinsic counterparts, which adds to the decision-making in choosing what to equip. Another change I'm really excited for is the unicorn horn no longer being usable for "restore ability", so ability-draining effects (of which there are many) are a more significant threat (they were effectively zero threat until now).

Also very cool to hear the quest is now possible to do early (despite being a Bad Idea) as that has great implications for speedrunning or "fewest turns" runs.

Can't wait to dive in!

Hackbratenabout 1 hour ago
I've been playing on and off for 15 years, sometimes daily for months on end. The deepest I managed to go is level 11, and as soon as I enter the Big Room, I die. In fact, I went past level 8 for the first time this year. I've read all of the NetHack wiki back and forth. I don't have the slightest idea what I'm doing wrong or how to improve.

I'm 46 now, and if I continue that pace, I'll be dead before I even reach the bottom, let alone ascend.

andwaalabout 1 hour ago
Been pkaying on and off since I was 12, 38 today.. Good times. Quick tip is to play valkyrie, dip sword for excalibur, rub any lamps and wish for sdsm, and you should be good.

Also check out DCSS, amazing game, been playing for soon 40 years.

Hackbraten29 minutes ago
I've had them all. I’ve had wands of wishing, I die. I’ve worn blessed greased amazing technicolor Valenciaga +9001 silver patent leather dragon 2x HiDPIscale mail, I die. I step in a fucking trap, I get surrounded by a dozen killer bees, I die. Soldier ant, I die.
andwaal22 minutes ago
Haha amazing times, just have to go at it again, and again and again.
anthk20 minutes ago
13 in Slashem with the Doppleganger monk. HInt: there's the #technique feature, just type down

      #tech
ingame and say hello to Dragon Ball like attacks kicking everyone's asses.
pimeys16 minutes ago
Here's a good report on a completely unspoiled playthrough which was an interesting read.

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.games.roguelike.nethack/c/wc...

wwwestonabout 1 hour ago
And here I thought I was safe from losing months to escapism like I did in the 2000s (learned to ascend with every class though!)

Anyone know why the skip over 4.x, or have any insight into how much play has changed as well as infrastructure?

jsnabout 1 hour ago
The DevTeam released nethack-3.4.3 in Dec 2003, and then pretty much went dormant for 11 years -- no new releases, no roadmap, nothing. So some time around 2013 some people not connected to the DevTeam created this project: http://nethack4.org/ . So now the DevTeam skips 4.x version numbers completely to avoid confusion.
chowellsabout 1 hour ago
They likely were inspired by Microsoft's innovation in skipping 4.x of DirectX.
zorkedabout 3 hours ago
First impression: it has a tutorial, which should actually help increase the player base quite a bit.

It comes with some movement quality of life (e.g. moving into a door opens it, moving into an obviously dangerous thing requires confirmation).

If you enable the option, there's color coding of health (green -> full), burden level, and states like poisoning, which I think is new too.

You can filter out messages like "you have displaced your pet".

CobrastanJorjiabout 3 hours ago
Amazing.

I was never any good at Nethack. I think I just get impatient. I could regularly get a bit past Medusa but anything past that definitely involved save scumming. I was always a little jealous of the folks who could ascend regularly. But not jealous enough to, like, do anything about it.

Nethack's always been amazing for the feeling of "the devs thought of everything." I wonder how well that feeling holds up today.

MarsIronPIabout 3 hours ago
Same. Partly it's that I always feel like I don't understand what's going on, mechanically speaking, as opposed to simpler roguelikes like Shattered Pixel Dungeon or Sil.
pimeysabout 2 hours ago
Or do what I did when I played this as a child: read the spoilers. Then start with Valkyrie, get the Mjollnir, wand of wishing, and a dragon scale mail as fast as possible. And a bag of holding and you get pretty far.

It's a fantastic game if you have a bit of imagination. The possibilities are endless and it's so rewarding to ascend finally.

Der_Einzigeabout 1 hour ago
Much as chess frustrated the great game masters like bobby fischer for being too easily "gamable" with opening books, I find that the mods for games like nethack, i.e. SLASHEM et al, make it where even if you try to spoil it, the massive amount of new content combined with the relative lack of documentation force you to git gud.
mtlmtlmtlmtlabout 2 hours ago
As an avid Spelunky player(still trying to complete the Cosmic Ocean...), I recently decided to explore some of Spelunky's roots, and set out to learn Nethack, and fell in love with the game. After a few weeks of dying repeatedly, perusing the wiki, and watching the Ascending in Nethack Overexplained series on youtube(highly recommended), I managed to ascend a valkyrie. Planning on trying a harder role soon. It's amazing how tense it can be despite the turn based nature of the game.

I do like the nerfs in this release. Making excalibur harder to get for Valkyries is a good one, as well as nerfing the unicorn horn. The run where I ascended felt a bit too easy at times. But of course valkyrie will still be by far the easiest role, I think. I bet I'll be stuck for quite a while trying to ascend anything else.

Advertisement
agiacaloneabout 3 hours ago
Wow. Did not expect this when I logged in to HN today. It's 1998 all over again for me. :)
robbiewxyzabout 3 hours ago
I played Nethack quite a bit as a teen but was never patient enough to ascend. Always YASD.

I revisited the game a few years ago & was happy to realize I had, in the meantime, grown the necessary patience. Ascending felt great.

omoikaneabout 3 hours ago
stickfigureabout 3 hours ago
I must... resist...

(I probably play to finish ever 5 years or so)

It occurs to me that procedurally generated dungeons would be amazing with LLMs. Imagine every level with the sophistication of nethack's "special" levels. I hope someone out there is working on it!

zeristorabout 1 hour ago
ASCII all the way. In the dim and distant past there was a game Mazigs on the ZX81, a maze monster game, using ZX81 graphics.

Perhaps using those graphics for Nethack would be interesting. I think we could remove FAST mode.

Generally with such ideas several people thought and implemented it 20 years ago.

zeristorabout 1 hour ago
Oh.

Mazogs is shit, not as impressive as I imagined it.

erickhill17 minutes ago
Only Amiga makes it possible. ;)
avd201about 2 hours ago
Back when I was on undergrad I sometimes managed to get to the castle, but never very consistently. Opening NAO was one of my go to ways of dealing with spare time but I haven't played the game much since. This is wild tho, never imagined we would get to version 5
Doveabout 2 hours ago
> make unique swallowing monsters (Juiblex) resist magical digging from inside

Oh noooooooooo... yeah that's fair.

Lots of overdue gameplay changes here, really. I was something of an expert player 20 years ago, my best ascenscion being Atheist/Genoless/Wishless with no pet to boot. It seems a lot has changed. I see fixes on this list for things that bothered me then. :)

9x39about 2 hours ago
The depth of NetHack is surprising. They have a saying - the devs thought of everything. If you can tolerate the mechanics, the emergent dungeon delving stories are interesting.

Dungeon crawling as a tourist with a camera, rubbing a lamp and it’s a magic lamp that gives you a wish, kicking a fountain and bringing out a succubus who steals your equipment and teleports away, finding a scroll of genocide and accidentally genociding yourself because you forgot you were polymorphed, robbing shopkeepers blind with your pet dog, scratching a magic word in the ground at your it feet with your sword because you’re outnumbered to scare the enemies away, looting past dead bodies with legendary gear only to find one of the unidentified amulets was a cursed amulet of strangulation and now it’s welded to you and cant be taken off. You die. Play again?

The last time I played, it was with a build that had visual tiles instead of ascii which were kinda retro fun. Hope to see a similar build on 5.0 one day.

https://nethackwiki.com/wiki/Tileset

entunoabout 2 hours ago
There's been a lot of nice quality of life changes in the 3.7 builds (which has now become 5.0.0) that make going back to the older versions a bit painful.

Also some pretty major gameplay and balance changes, some of which are pretty controversial. But overall, I think that it's a big improvement, and although I don't necessarily agree with all the changes it certainly makes the mid and late game a lot more interesting and varied (not to mention dangerous) than it was in 3.6.7.

Advertisement
bakooabout 2 hours ago
Wow! Wonder how they test all the releases.

> The source release includes all the code for the above versions plus code for the systems listed below.

    Windows 8.x/10/11
    Linux
    macOS
    AmigaDOS
    Windows CE
    OS/2
    Unix (*BSD, System V, Solaris, HP-UX, ...)
    BeOS
    VMS
oceanskyabout 1 hour ago
Last update was 1171 days ago.

Nethack is one of the best open source projects.

YZFabout 1 hour ago
NetHack ... so many great memories of time sunk ;) To click or not to click, that is the question.
tiahura16 minutes ago
Anyone else using claude code to play nethack in a tmux pane?
askosabout 2 hours ago
Ah, trip down the memory lane... I guess I have to try to recall now how the game was played. There is a great likelihood last time was more than 25 years ago.
forestoabout 2 hours ago
In the early days of NetHack, spoilers were not so widely known (the web didn't exist yet) and save scumming was more difficult* (few people had admin access on systems that could run it) compared to now.

I wonder how many players today will resist those temptations now that they're not only trivial to discover and execute, but also widely accepted in gaming culture.

I urge new players to resist spoilers and cheats for as long as they can. This game is full of wonderful details and interactions that are not at all obvious, and they make it exceptionally rewarding to progress when you do so by discovering them on your own.

Of course, my recommended approach will mean dying a lot. If you keep a journal of things you do and notice in each play-through, your eulogy will be more useful. :)

Take heart: Starting over means you're likely to encounter new things in the levels you've seen before, so it won't be boring.

...

*I don't recall why the save files seemed elusive back then. Perhaps the system on which I played put them someplace obscure that I lacked either the motivation or the knowledge to find. Or perhaps they were kept out of reach of the player by unix permissions, requiring setuid for the game to read them. Either way, I'm glad, because the challenge and mystery of playing with only what the game provided made it all the more interesting.

zorkedabout 2 hours ago
Nethack runs as a setgid process that hides save files from users.

Kind of old fashioned now that almost every Unix system is a single user system. There are still public servers for those that want the temptation to be taken away from them.

As to spoilers... Everybody reads the spoilers. I doubt anyone has ever ascended spoiler-free.

rcxdudeabout 1 hour ago
Nethack is pretty punishingly difficult even with spoilers, so trying to go spoilerless is not for the faint of heart. The game does try to allow spoilerless play but I'm not sure it's tremendously well designed in that regard. So I understand the appeal but I think this is advice is only good for people who want a truly difficult challenge.
pimeysabout 2 hours ago
Play as you like. Just saying I did read spoilers as a kid when I played it and I feel I did not lose anything. I learned a lot of English and after all these years Nethack is still the most memorable game I played.
m000about 3 hours ago
Wow! The inclusion of Lua bindings seems like a major step forward. This should make modding much more accessible.
monarchwadiaabout 3 hours ago
Oh I missed that I the announcement. Nice!!!
adeonabout 2 hours ago
I played this game a bit back in 3.4.3 times.

It's been great on long-haul flights to play on the laptop. Doesn't demand your battery.

hackeraccountabout 2 hours ago
Never ascended but my main strategy revolved around something fixed in 3.7. Bummed me out so much that I stopped playing.

Now though. Maybe I'll go back to it

helterskelterabout 2 hours ago
I used to play NetHack on my laptop when my then-girlfiend and I had to watch her baby sister and she'd like to sit and watch. One day we had to go to her birthday party, and because we were in our twenties and unenthused about going to a kid's costume party we got a roll of duct tape on the way there and put @ symbols on our shirts and made her a birthday card on printer paper rolled up with random letters written on the outside. She absolutely loved it but nobody else got it, and her friends parents thought we were fucking weirdos. We thought about bringing wine to quaff, probably better we didn't, lol.
Advertisement
Zitraxabout 3 hours ago
What happened to version 4? Looks like last release was 3.6.7.
stryanabout 3 hours ago
Possibly to avoid conflicts with Nethack4[0], which was a fork of the Nethack 3.x series back when development was stalled. I think the guy behind it later joined the main Nethack dev team.

[0] http://nethack4.org/

rsaarelmabout 3 hours ago
There is a variant named NetHack 4, they might want to avoid confusion with it.
bombcarabout 3 hours ago
Nethack 3.11 for Workgroups was right there ;)
anthk29 minutes ago
I still play Slashem daily, but vanilla Nethack it's a must because of Pratchett.
jmyeetabout 1 hour ago
My Nethack story is that in the 1990s I once got fired from a job for downloading NetHack because, I kid you not, it hit some Web log filter for the word "hack". I got dragged into a meeting with three log entries in yellow highlighter on a dot matrix printout showing the word "hack". Expalanations that it was a computer game went nowhere.

I don't think I ever legitimately completed NetHack. I think the best I did was getting to the elemental planes. Later I read about some of the strats and kit you aim for, which I think was a mistake because it kinda ruined it for me.

I'm honestly surprised this is still going on. Kudos to anyone still keeping this going. I'd kinda assumed it was forever stuck in 3.7? I see there are 3100 bugfixes and changes. I really wish there was a summary of major changes. Maybe there are none and it's just a backend revamp plus bugfixes that they bumped the major version on.

tiahuraabout 3 hours ago
Been playing for hack since Fred Fish #7 1987. Still have never reached the amulet.
mordechai9000about 2 hours ago
"Slow down. Think clearly." - Izchak

Solid advice, but not easy for me. I made it to the astral planes, once.

frenzcanabout 2 hours ago
This comment made me feel better about my woeful track record with nethack
haakonabout 2 hours ago
Can you name a game that is older than NetHack and still in active development? I can't.
kibwenabout 2 hours ago
Wikipedia's historical list of MUDs ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_MUDs ) suggests that MUD1 (1978, homepage: https://www.british-legends.com/CMS/ ) and MUD2 (1985, homepage: https://www.mud2.com/CMS/index.php ) might still be active. From what I can tell their codebases are pretty light on substantial updates in recent years, but then again Nethack was at point considered abandoned for about a decade.
anthk19 minutes ago
You forgot the forks like Slashem and the like, which were born from Nethack 3.4.3.
foo12barabout 1 hour ago
Waiting for VR
jmclnxabout 2 hours ago
Seems each NetHack release it gets harder and harder :)

But I since we are in May I would guess it will be part of junethack:

https://junethack.net/

I cannot get into hardfought.org right now, but nethack.alt seems to be available. I can see alt.org is using nethack 3.6.7

looking forward to giving v5 a try.

SilentM68about 3 hours ago
:)
user3939382about 1 hour ago
Ah yes, the game with punctuation moving around I have no idea what’s happening and exit.