Discussion (0 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

SuperV1234•about 2 hours ago

This is the level of quality you can expect from `ruvnet` projects: https://github.com/deletexiumu/wifi-densepose

As a very pro-AI person, this is exactly what I would define AI slop.

---

The whole thing is a scam: https://cognitum.one/

jb1991•about 2 hours ago

It’s a sad side effect of the AI revolution that no one knows what is real and trustworthy anymore. I saw a “rare” photo someone shared on Reddit of Hitler and it received tons of comments until it was pointed out that it’s definitely not a real photo.

jcutrell•about 2 hours ago

With products coming out like this, many claim to do basically the same thing.

How is this better than Claude Code's built in agent orchestrator? Do I need 100 agent types? How do I know the trained agents here are somehow better? Specialization doesn't equate to "better" in every case.

I want to see the light but at this point it feels like these kinds of projects need a better way to benchmark how they are improving on the available state of the art.

It feels like in 2018, a new browser state management tool emerging. Why does this exist?

loopmonster•about 2 hours ago

Most of the things on the linked doc's list of things Claude Code can't do, it definitely can.

alansaber•about 2 hours ago

I'd call this optimistic overengineering. Throw every fad at a problem, rather solving a problem iteratively.

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion (0 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews