Tesla Model Y Passes NHTSA's New 'Advanced Driver Assistance System' Tests

aamanaplanacanal about 3 hours ago 40 commentsRead Article on nhtsa.gov

HI version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 1155 words in the discussion.

Discussion (40 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

dmix•about 3 hours ago

A Chinese TV channel spent a bunch of money doing ADAS tests and Tesla came out on top of all the Chinese brands, including all the LIDAR systems. Although tests were all in the day time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xumyEf-WRI&t=1203s

https://electrek.co/2025/07/29/another-huge-chinese-self-dri...

XPENG (major chinese ADAS brand) recently decided to copy Tesla's vision-only+AI world gen data approach, after originally focusing only on LIDAR https://electrek.co/2026/04/29/xpeng-vla-2-test-drive-tesla-...

There's also been talk of companies pushing a hybrid LIDAR+vision approach using custom hardware since it's complex to merge the two datasets. So the answer might eventually be somewhere in between instead of companies choosing one or the other depending on costs.

kvuj•41 minutes ago

My god, from this video I learned two things:

- Tesla's vision only approach seems a lot more competent than the Lidar suites from smaller Chinese makers. Perhaps I misjudged how necessary Lidar was to achieve safe driving.

- Virtually all of the Chinese car infotainment were basically a 1:1 copy of Tesla's. I couldn't find any that genuinely tried something unique lol

BugsJustFindMe•16 minutes ago

> - Tesla's vision only approach seems a lot more competent than the Lidar suites from smaller Chinese makers. Perhaps I misjudged how necessary Lidar was to achieve safe driving.

Three things can be simultaneously true:

* Tesla's cameras are sufficient for some scenarios.

* Tesla's cameras are insufficient for other scenarios.

* A system with good data and bad algorithmic processing is still going to be bad. The Chinese vehicles almost always fail the tests because they see the obstacle but drive into it anyway.

fooker•27 minutes ago

It'll be difficult for any single company to compete with Tesla on scale and the AI we have so far rewards scale like no other technology before it.

Yes Waymo exists, but the amount of training data they have is a few orders of magnitude lower.

DiogenesKynikos•21 minutes ago

The article notes that these tests were all done in daylight, where Lidar provides less of an advantage.

guywithahat•25 minutes ago

Yeah it's interesting hearing their engineering logic, that fewer sensor types means less sensor collision and faster iteration, where iteration speed is really what matters. I also think people overhyped lidar because they don't understand it, and human behavior is to associate things we don't understand to magic. It's not magic, it performs poorly in inclination weather and can have issues with resolution over range and data processing (although lidar does do a lot of things well).

All of this said, once Karpathy left they have slowly looked at adding new sensors (recently radar), so who knows what the future for Tesla's sensor suite holds.

epoxia•about 1 hour ago

I wonder if we're going to see a different spin on dieselgate in the future. Where a car company collects all the data from the NHTSA's test environment through the cars cameras/sensors and then includes that data into the training datasets for other cars/sfw updates. (I'm not implying that this happened, but I imagine it would at some point)

amazingamazing•about 3 hours ago

Neat. I wonder which others will pass. I wonder if safety sense 3 cars will pass too. Speaking of which it’s insane a sienna doesn’t have that. I wish Tesla made a van instead of the cyber truck. Americans and their truck obsession…

MrBuddyCasino•about 2 hours ago

A Tesla van would be amazing. Unfortunately not going to happen.

paradox460•about 1 hour ago

I keep hoping Edison motors up in Canada comes out with a Van conversion kit like their pick up kit

to11mtm•42 minutes ago

... Do the Edison kits still use the original transmission?

Cause if not, it would be hilarious to do that to a clapped out van...

laweijfmvo•about 3 hours ago

yet i still can’t use basic autopilot on the highway because it phantom brakes every 2 hours

aetherspawn•about 2 hours ago

Autopilot (no longer for sale) is so unsafe I’m surprised there’s no class action for owners to force Tesla to upgrade it to FSD for free.

Especially in right hand drive markets (non US) it’s even worse than Toyota’s radar cruise.

I’ve nearly been killed by it about 5 times because it randomly steers into fences and things. It also randomly fails to change lanes (1 in 100), and then just randomly steers full lock and goes out of control.

Model 3 - Highland

lotsofpulp•about 2 hours ago

Autopilot in my 2024 Model Y never changes lanes. That has always been a feature restricted to “Full” Self Driving. Autopilot is just lane assist and cruise control.

I can’t recall anytime either Autopilot or FSD put me in danger though.

aetherspawn•about 2 hours ago

The branding is confusing. I’m talking about the paid version of Autopilot, which was for sale for $5000, sometimes called “Autopilot Plus”.

For right hand drive markets, it seems to be a stripped down version of FSD 10 or 11. It automatically changes lanes, takes corners and highway exits, but does not stop at traffic lights. It drives exactly in the middle of the lane, doesn’t shuffle over for trucks, and is easily confused.

radial_symmetry•about 3 hours ago

Are you on an extremely old version or something? I have had my model Y for 5 years and it only phantom braked once ever.

aetherspawn•about 2 hours ago

Many countries in the world are on a 6+ year old version of Autopilot, yeah..

amarant•11 minutes ago

Really? That's weird, I owned a Tesla in Sweden for 2 years and had perhaps 3 ghost break events total. I used autopilot(not fsd) a lot.

ajross•about 2 hours ago

So, that's not my experience with current FSD versions. But whatever, sure. Let's accept your data point as measured:

Every... TWO HOURS?! I mean, come on. Put a camera on yourself or another human driver. There's an unexpected braking event at least that often, almost always in a more dangerous situation. The human failure tends to be failing to detect a real obstacle, vs. slowing for a phantom one.

This is just too much. If you don't like it don't use it. But to pretend that stomps-the-brakes-every-few-hours is a stop ship kind of safety bug is quite frankly ridiculous.

sumeno•about 2 hours ago

If you are having unexpected braking events every 2 hours you should be paying better attention to your driving. I go months without them

tzs•about 2 hours ago

> Every... TWO HOURS?! I mean, come on. Put a camera on yourself or another human driver. There's an unexpected braking event at least that often, almost always in a more dangerous situation

Wait...what are counting as an "unexpected braking event"? I can't think of anything I do with brakes that would not be counted as ordinary braking that happens anywhere near as often as every two hours.

readthenotes1•about 3 hours ago

"four newly integrated advanced safety tests:

    Pedestrian automatic emergency braking 
    Lane keeping assistance 
    Blind spot warning, and  
    Blind spot intervention

Don't most cars do something like that now? I'm curious what's different between Tesla and, say, a Honda Accord?

calchris42•about 3 hours ago

The article is vague, but I suspect this is referring to FMVSS-127 which makes certain active safety features mandatory in 2029 and also increases the difficulty of some required to pass scenarios. The new scenarios require responding from higher initial speeds which effectively requires longer sensor ranges and/or lower latency.

sumeno•about 3 hours ago

How much did Honda's CEO give the president in the last election?

kyleee•about 2 hours ago

10% for the big guy, iirc

brandonagr2•about 3 hours ago

There is a big difference between "something like" and actually passing the tests, I would be surprised if any non vision based system has the reaction time needed to pass the new pedestrian tests.

bdangubic•about 3 hours ago

Tesla has a Dog mode

flippyhead•about 3 hours ago

wth man I was told mh Model Y that I bought around 2021 was going to do all this but it's now too old or something?

emmelaich•about 1 hour ago

Apparently some HW3 cars can get it. It's listed available for my 2022 Model 3 (Australia/Sydney). However the cost is twice what they charge for HW4, I believe.

It seems other HW3 might get a FSD-lite version. There's no official way to upgrade HW3-HW4.

cevn•about 3 hours ago

I'm in the same boat, this is a whole thing right now. There is some kinda class action in Europe which will hopefully make them pay up or deliver something useful. I think a Refund plus interest plus a hefty fine for lying would be a good start.

ricardonunez•about 3 hours ago

It seems you got musked, overpromised and underdelivered.

kyleee•about 2 hours ago

He at least bought me a horse

gamblor956•about 3 hours ago

A Tesla still can't detect a motorcycle next to it, so I can't see how it would ace the blind spot warning test.

Any other administration and I would be willing to grant the benefit of the doubt, but Musk's spent a lot of money to corrupt government agencies over the past year and a half so that he could get silly pronouncements that the most dangerous "advanced" driving system in the world is somehow also the safest. (More people have been killed by Tesla's ADAS systems than every other automaker's ADAS systems, in the world, combined.)

delabay•33 minutes ago

This is obviously a factually incorrect post as anybody who uses the product can attest

brandonagr2•about 3 hours ago

Obviously your priors are wrong, it can ace a blind spot warning test because it can detect a motorcycle next to it.