Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

47% Positive

Analyzed from 2926 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#wheat#https#china#water#more#soybeans#prices#data#soy#food

Discussion (112 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

ericpauleyabout 2 hours ago
Title claims "due to plains drought" but the article text largely attributes this to increased planting of soy for its lower fertilizer requirements (related to Strait of Hormuz).
pragmaticabout 1 hour ago
Wheat isn’t grown in the same places that beans grow.

If you can, you’re rotating beans and corn every year. (“Roundup ready” of course)

Wheat is on the marginal drier land. Not that they couldn’t plant wheat there but beans are way more profitable and so they don’t.

The plains is by definition more arid, marginal land a step up from pasture/grazing.

A lot of traditional wheat/sunflower/barley/oats has gone over to beans and corn bc roundup and GMO.

On my family’s farm I don’t remember the last time we had wheat crop but that was our staple for like 50 years.

mech99887718 minutes ago
Whean and soybeans are often grown on the same land. Your 1st and 5th sentences seem to contradict eachother, I might not be understanding.
jandrewrogers20 minutes ago
> Wheat isn’t grown in the same places that beans grow.

It depends on what you mean by "beans". The Palouse agricultural region is famously one of the highest yielding wheat and legume producing regions in North America.

mohamedkoubaaabout 2 hours ago
At many of these publications the editor chooses the title, not the author. They know full well that most people will read the headline but not the article.
fullstopabout 2 hours ago
Has the USA's potash supply been reduced due to strained relations with Canada? They are our top supplier, by far.
metiscusabout 2 hours ago
Fertilizer is pretty fungible and is a global market, so even if the US is primarily supplied by Canada, and overall global demand remained constant, prices would go up since there will be supply reduction due to the Hormuz strait being closed.
HarHarVeryFunny38 minutes ago
A lot of crops need nitrogen. What has been impacted by Trump's Iran war is the supply of Urea through the Straight of Hormuz.

If the closure persists then no doubt other sources can ramp up to fill the void, but it's going to be too late for this season. Some Asian farmers are not bothering with their rice crops wince the rise on fertilizer (urea) cost has meant they'd be losing money.

Fuel prices are also impacting imported produce prices.

SecretDreamsabout 2 hours ago
Yes. Despite what others have said, yes. But, in general, because of the current global dynamics, fertilizer is more expensive wherever you're going to be getting it from. It just doesn't help that the US has picked a trade war with all allies at the same time, while also engaging in real wars that disrupt global supply chains of critical resources.
maerF0x039 minutes ago
It shocks me when I realize it's only been 16/48 of his term. We still have 2/3rds to go.
koverstreetabout 2 hours ago
Are you forgetting the nitrogen? :)
fullstopabout 2 hours ago
The US produces most of their own nitrogen, but the same is not true of potash.
bluGillabout 2 hours ago
The US provides a lot of its own supply there.
colechristensenabout 2 hours ago
It's the nitrogen fertilizer almost all of which is manufactured from methane + air.
bluGillabout 1 hour ago
Pedantically, most of it is manufactured by biological processes in the soil. Soy Beans are really good at this which is why it is planted so much (the food value is secondary, but enough to give it the edge over alternatives)

For supplemental fertilizer you buy though you are correct.

eductionabout 1 hour ago
You are wrong and the drought attribution is correct: Winter wheat is the dominant variety in the U.S. and is (and is projected to be further) down due to drought.

"a severe drought in the U.S. Plains has curbed production of hard red winter wheat, the largest variety grown in the U.S... The USDA projected U.S. wheat production in the 2026/27 season at 1.561 billion bushels, down from 1.985 billion in 2025/26, as a severe drought in the U.S. Plains was likely to slash the hard red winter wheat crop by 25% from a year earlier."

"The USDA rated just 28% of the U.S. winter wheat crop in good-to-excellent condition in a weekly crop conditions report on Monday, the lowest rating for this point in the growing season in four years."

This was mentioned in the very first sentence, it's the very first attribution of falling wheat harvest.

Yes Hormuz and rising oil costs are also a factor, a secondary one since they are impacting spring wheat planting decisions as you mention.

SecretDreamsabout 2 hours ago
Agreed.

But there's a very weird underlying sentiment on HN where many people seem to directly or indirectly jump whenever they can to downplay the existence of climate change. Sometimes, they are emboldened by articles like this which intentionally use misleading headlines.

You're completely right, though, that in this instance, soy beans were mostly focused on because of consumer trends and less fertilizer need. Wheat is just an expensive crop right now. Also, soybeans would actually be less resilient to drought which furthers your point re: the article headline.

FrustratedMonkyabout 1 hour ago
Maybe a positive. Soy Beans are more healthy.

So lower fertilizer demand, and healthier produce, could be a net positive.

Kind of like an oil shortage is driving an increase in EVs and renewable energy.

Finally waking up the US that oil dependence is a National Security issue that renewables are possible solution for. That renewables aren't the 'woke' enemy, but a valid technical option.

So, maybe a net positive.

jqpabc12338 minutes ago
Finally waking up the US that oil dependence is a National Security issue

Even worse, oil dependence is a competitive liability --- not an advantage.

AI is energy intensive. And more expensive, carbon based based energy is a competitive disadvantage.

A competitive disadvantage in AI is an economic issue --- which ultimately translates into a National Security issue.

China leadership understands this. USA leadership is clueless.

FrustratedMonky22 minutes ago
We're in an energy crunch, and Republicans think it is a good idea to cancel wind farms because they ruin the view.
btbuildemabout 2 hours ago
> growers expanded plantings of soybeans, which require less fertilizer than grains like corn and wheat

It's not the drought per se, it's input costs. Farmers are favouring crops that need less nitrogen and potassium.

Commodities have responded accordingly.

embedding-shapeabout 2 hours ago
> growers expanded plantings of soybeans

A year ago China stopped buying soybeans from the US is seems ("China Bought $12.6 Billion in U.S. Soybeans Last Year. Now, It’s $0." - https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/25/business/china-soybean-sa...), was that resumed, or who are all these new soybeans going to? Is it all for national use instead of export?

bluGillabout 2 hours ago
When China buys from someone else (Brazil - nobody else has significant soy bean surplus) that means whoever was buying from that someone else now needs to go to the US.

The US also uses a lot of soy beans internally. Prices are down, but farmers are still selling soybeans and with careful management are making money.

panflute31 minutes ago
I don't think international trade is so stable that any shift would imply equal and opposite shifts in trade. For example it looks like Brazil's production is up 5% while China's overall usage may be down 6%.
maerF0x036 minutes ago
Soybeans are a pretty stellar food for protein per calorie.

And to stop misinformation in its tracks:

> A March 2021 meta-analysis published in Reproductive Toxicology concluded that neither soy protein nor isoflavone intake significantly affects reproductive hormone levels in men. Analyzing data from 41 studies and 1,753 participants, the researchers found no statistically significant effects on testosterone or estrogen regardless of intake dose or duration.

so Gemini says, link - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33383165/

cogman10about 2 hours ago
I expect other nations are still consuming US soybeans. China stopped because it was particularly negatively targeted by US tariff policy.

But make no mistake, it has caused problems for farmers.

The report from my small hometown farmers is that everything, except for beef, is down right now while the prices of inputs like fertilizer are high. Some of the farmers in my hometown have already sold their land to megacorp farmers in response because they simply can't survive.

embedding-shapeabout 2 hours ago
> I expect other nations are still consuming US soybeans

But who? Compared to 2024, 2025 had almost half soybean exports it seems (https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/commodities/soybeans), I'm guessing most of the difference was China basically stopped buying soybeans.

But it's a huge difference, yet production seems to be ramping up? I don't understand why they'd do that when the exports are going down?

fullstopabout 2 hours ago
It wouldn't surprise me, at all, if the soybeans rotted away with no consumers.
Forgeties79about 2 hours ago
China has a tendency to shift to self-reliance or importing from more pliable neighborswhenever they execute policies like that. So even if they’re buying again, I highly doubt it is at the same rate it once was
lukasb7 minutes ago
My fault: last weekend I told my wife during a discussion of climate change "hey, at least we don't have to worry that the rains won't come and the crops will fail."
eightysixfourabout 2 hours ago
Western hay prices are as much as double what they were last year for feed: https://www.reddit.com/r/homestead/comments/1ta64d0/breaking...
Brybryabout 1 hour ago
I'd take that source with a grain of salt.

The website's domain was created 3 months ago (site doesn't even have any entries in the wayback machine) and supposedly pulls from USDA AMS data but when I looked at reports[1][2] I didn't see double prices compared to last year.

Some prices even looked lower? But it was hard to make comparisons because of report structure and data disparity.

[1] CA Hay: https://mymarketnews.ams.usda.gov/viewReport/2904

[2] CO Hay: https://mymarketnews.ams.usda.gov/viewReport/2905

gbear605about 1 hour ago
From the hay prices I’ve seen recently as a consumer, they’re up by like 20-30%, but not double.
qriosabout 2 hours ago
When I read this thread, "Interstellar" immediately comes to mind.

Thanks for sharing!

YesThatTom2about 1 hour ago
“Dictators stay in power until there are food riots” is what every sociologist I know tells me.

I hope the “riots” are in the form of voting.

Joel_Mckay24 minutes ago
This book discuses why regimes are stable. Notably starving disconnected illiterate peoples rarely change things without military cooperation.

"The Dictator's Handbook: Why Bad Behavior is Almost Always Good Politics" (Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Alastair Smith)

https://www.amazon.com/Dictators-Handbook-Behavior-Almost-Po...

The CGP Grey youtube short is an entertaining summary of the books subjects:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs

>in the form of voting.

The current US representatives were voted into, out-of, and back into power.

It is interesting, but will likely remain stable. =3

maerF0x034 minutes ago
I've always wondered why we consider it ok when an illegitimate, unjust, or unhinged government uses violence, but not when people on the right side of history? Like yeah don't go smash up small businesses and murder innocent bystanders. But if Trump refuses to leave at the end of his term, I hope someone has the courage to use minimum required violence to remove him.
Joel_Mckay19 minutes ago
>violence

Doesn't escape despotism cycles, and just makes a country a worse place to live.

Historically, without respect for people you disagree with, it only gets worse for everyone. This lesson was simply forgotten by many. =3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdVB-R6Duso

evanjrowleyabout 2 hours ago
Same region all the new data centers are being built. Unfortunately, humans can't eat data like they can wheat.
RiverCrochetabout 1 hour ago
DNA is technically data, right?
9rxabout 2 hours ago
You can eat soybeans, though, which are seeing record production thanks to it supplanting what is affectionately known in agriculture circles as poverty grass.
threetonesunabout 2 hours ago
There's some cosmic irony that this is happening when the people who came up with the derogatory term "soy boys" are in office, but I'm too depressed to laugh about it.
fullstopabout 2 hours ago
Perhaps someone in the industry can chime in, but I had read that the soybeans that the US primarily grows and previously sold to China were used for pig feed. In my mind I pictured it like "cow corn" -- humans technically can eat it, but it's chewy and not very good.

Are there different grades of soybean?

bluGillabout 2 hours ago
There are different grades with different properties. However very few are consumed by humans. When sold for humans it is called edamame.

The most common use is crush the beans, and collect the oil feeding the rest to pigs. If you read the ingredients at the grocery store, soy bean oil comes up a lot. Soy bean oil is also often used in diesel engines after processing.

forshaperabout 2 hours ago
I would appreciate tofu being cheaper than pork again.
9rxabout 2 hours ago
> humans technically can eat it, but it's chewy and not very good.

Not just technically. It is a relatively common food. A fair bit of it is crushed (i.e. turned into cooking oil). But it is also a product used in a number of processed foods, tofu, etc. Granted, it does seem to be eaten less commonly in the USA, but is more often used in Asian cuisines.

> Are there different grades of soybean?

All crops have different grades. Poor weather conditions is the most likely reason for a downgrade.

Pay08about 1 hour ago
This doesn't have anything to do with data centres.
Jgrubbabout 2 hours ago
"All the new data centers" are being built everywhere.
dgellowabout 2 hours ago
They are planned everywhere, if they are actually being built is a different story
jeffbeeabout 2 hours ago
Largely not. Data center people aren't idiots. They site their projects in places with water and power, or if not power then at least gas. I don't think you'd be able to point out a project that actually exists and is competing for a scarce local water resource.
bluGillabout 2 hours ago
Data centers don't use much water on the scale of things. The numbers look big in isolation, but most people have no idea how much water a country really needs and isolating the numbers makes data centers look bad.
jeffbeeabout 2 hours ago
Wheat, being basically worthless, is predominantly not irrigated. A data center that draws water from a river or aquifer is not a rival to wheat, which relies on rain. When farmers have invested in irrigation they largely grow something else that's worth actual money.
giantg2about 2 hours ago
It will only get worse for the next generation as the aquafers are continuing to be depleted.
bell-cotabout 2 hours ago
Yes - but at current rates, it won't take anything like an actual generation to get substantially worse.
mikey_pabout 1 hour ago
Is anyone actually irrigating wheat??
tdb789326 minutes ago
It seems like most significant agriculture extension programs have advice for irrigating wheat, so presumably someone is doing it, even if it isn't common. If drought is reducing yields significantly I wonder if the amount is going to start growing.

E.g.

https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/considerations_for_raising_irr...

https://extensionpubs.unl.edu/publication/ec731/2009/pdf/vie...

https://ucanr.edu/blog/uc-small-grains-blog/article/irrigati...

https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/considerations_for_raising_irr...

https://waterquality.colostate.edu/documents/factsheets/0055...

pragmaticabout 1 hour ago
No.
dakolliabout 2 hours ago
we live in a closed greenhouse system, the water just doesn't just disappear and most of the Earth is covered in it. Plenty of countries completely rely on desalination already, I think we'll be fine. I'm much more concerned about everyone becoming a moron from using AI.

edit: cloud seeding too.

shagieabout 2 hours ago
> Plenty of countries completely rely on desalination already

Let's take Kansas... the largest producer of wheat in the US. https://www.statista.com/statistics/190376/top-us-states-in-...

Kansas wheat crop down 38% from last year https://youtu.be/QjrhAXzEGDc

Kansas cannot run on desalination plants ... there's no salt water. The gulf coast of Texas is 1000 miles away.

While aquifers do regenerate (Groundwater levels in the Kansas High Plains aquifer see first overall increase since 2019 https://kgs.ku.edu/news/article/groundwater-levels-in-the-ka... ) I'm going to point out that news article has seven years of declines previously.

The aquifer that Kansas draws upon is the Ogallala Aquifer ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogallala_Aquifer ) and you can see the rate of depletion at https://www.climate.gov/news-features/featured-images/nation... - there are spots in Kansas where the groundwater dropped by 150 feet from before it was tapped with deep wells to 2015.

Yes, most of the earth is covered by water. Getting that water to Kansas and Nebraska and North Dakota, however, is a problem.

atomicnumber3about 2 hours ago
The problem is that aquifers are really cool natural filters, and only refill as fast as groundwater moves through the soil. So they're a finite resource. Instead of depleting them, people who want to farm in deserts should probably start desalinating or whatever themselves instead of assuming subsequent generations will do it.
mothballedabout 2 hours ago
The government made it literally the only way to claim much of the land out west[]. They require that you come up with an agricultural land including plan for watering crops on that acreage in order to claim the land. And you're required to execute the plan to get the deed.

In fact, this is the only remaining way I know of to more or less 'homestead' federal land in a way that results in a permanent deed. The rest of the homesteading type stuff was revoked back in like the 70s or 80s.

[] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert_Land_Act

andsoitisabout 2 hours ago
> Plenty of countries completely rely on desalination already

There are only 3 countries that do: Bahamas, Maldives, and Malta.

Other countries that depend heavily, but not completely: Qatar, Kuwait, UAE.

dopa42365about 2 hours ago
and desalination is so efficient/cheap at scale already that it barely affects water prices in those countries (less than 10% already, further shrinking every year as methods improve)
vel0cityabout 2 hours ago
Desalination isn't really much of an option for deeper inland and much higher than sea level areas. Tell me, which ocean is Dodge City KS going to pull from?
ChrisRRabout 2 hours ago
Global warming will bring the sea to them
pixl97about 2 hours ago
This is by far the dumbest post in this thread by a mile. It's funny saying AI will make people dumber when you've obviously don't understand this issue in the first place. Food security is human security. When you take a huge percentage of a countries grow able land out because it stops raining then food proces go up, often dramatically.

Desalination uses far more power than AI ever would.

hnthrow0287345about 2 hours ago
And if we wait until large scale desalination becomes profitable, it will be too late to respond quickly without massive upheaval and deaths.

This is where capitalism drives humanity off a cliff.

Imustaskforhelpabout 2 hours ago
Plants require a ton of desalinated water and Animals who eat plants as such require desalinated water too.

There are countries in middle east like UAE, Saudi arabia etc. which rely on desalination but they are relying it for the clean drinking water, not for the food generation. They import almost 90% of their food iirc.

The amount of energy required to desalinate all water and the environmental impacts to get that energy would literally be quite catastrophic and I am not even sure if it would be even feasible and food prices would literally skyrocket or food would simply be produced even more less by magnitudes of order.

shagieabout 2 hours ago
The middle east tends to import hay and food for their livestock from other countries rather than growing it locally.

https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/commodities/forage-and-hay

https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/QAT/yea...

HelloMcFlyabout 2 hours ago
The energy required to transport water from the coast to our major agricultural areas would be astronomical, and the resulting brine waste would create its own environmental crisis. If we get to a point where we're forced to bypass natural water cycles entirely, our native ecologies will have already collapsed. At that point, we'll be trying to engineer our way out of a total ecological apocalypse as masses starve in bread lines.
s1artibartfast10 minutes ago
If you enjoy pistachios, eat eat them this year, because you wont see them next year. California produces 70% of global supply and an indian summer this year ruined the crop. Many farmers aren't even planning to harvest.

20% of the remaining global supply comes from Iran, which has its own issues of drought and war.

belzebubabout 2 hours ago
Why do we have a drought USDA?
Tangurena234 minutes ago
Farmers have been pumping water out of the Ogallala Aquifer far faster than the aquifer has been absorbing rainwater.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogallala_Aquifer

superxpro12about 2 hours ago
Well if we dont test for it, then is there really a drought???
9rxabout 2 hours ago
Little to no rain.
jmyeetabout 2 hours ago
This is about China. The timing of this article coming out during the Trump-China summit is no accident. The article beat around the bush (pun intended) that the real issue here is that China stopped buying (or seriously cut back) US agricultural products (particularly soy) because of tariffs imposed on China last year that got to over 100% at one point. China now buys significantly more soy from Argentina instead.

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz is another big factor here as fertilizer prices have massively gone up. Diesel is more expensive too. Many crops this planting season (in the northern hemisphere) haven't been fertilized like they would normally and it's too late now so that will absolutely impact food prices later this year. The Global South will be disproportionately affected.

Lastly, the continued Russia-Ukraine war continues to impact Ukraine's wheat crops. Ukraine is (or was?) often called the "bread basket of Europe" because it was such a significant wheat grower and exporter.

We (the world) are genuinely going to have much more expensive food prices later this year and, in some places, there will be genuine famine.

CGMthrowawayabout 1 hour ago
IDK how many people in China are laser focused on agweb.com for their geopolitical negotiations.

The data comes from USDA's WASDE report which is released every month, between the 8th and 12th. There is no "timing," and people were talking about the expect wheat harvest this season for weeks ahead of Tue's report anyway

jmyeetabout 1 hour ago
Chinese citizens aren't the target audience. The US administration is. This article is basically saying "please, Mr President, get China to buy more of our agricultural goods".

The "when" of media coverage is just as important as the "what" and the "when" here is while the president is currently in China. If you want to think that's irrelevant, that's a choice I guess.

mikey_pabout 1 hour ago
I'm 45, grew up on a farm and I have childhood memories of my dad looking forward to the crop reports because those would have such an enormous effect on market prices.

If this was meant to manipulate Trump into specific behavior, it is a masterful long play seeing as how this report is published in roughly the same way for over 50 years.

bluGillabout 2 hours ago
You are mostly correct, but note that China has resumed buying US soy beans in the past few months.
alt227about 2 hours ago
> This is about China.

From what your saying it sounds more about Tariffs