Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

42% Positive

Analyzed from 447 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#free#speech#america#style#political#step#least#more#usa#defending

Discussion (32 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

stephen_g1 day ago
Ah, the good old "I never thought leopards would eat my face" after voting for the 'leopards eating people's faces party'...

Somehow I have zero hope the bill she is proposing as a replacement could be any better than the absolute horror that the OSA is though...

Defletter1 day ago
Ditto, but also the so-called "Free Speech Bill" advocated by the publisher which explicitly attempts to import America-style free speech into the country as law. Thankfully, it doesn't seem to be something Parliament is entertaining, at least not yet.
streetfighter641 day ago
What's wrong with america-style free speech? In my opinion that's one of the few things they got more right than many european countries.
Defletter1 day ago
Have you not noticed what it's done to their country?
latexr1 day ago
> What's wrong with america-style free speech?

The biggest issue might be the false belief that it’s superior to others or that the USA is somehow “more free” than other democracies. That’s propaganda, and has precipitated the erosion of freedoms in the USA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_Unite...

As just one example of the failures of “america-style free speech”: Defending that corporations making large donations to political candidates is free speech. Talk about an incentive to corruption.

dwroberts1 day ago
For people outside the UK: this person is not really credible. She is an incompetent moron that is desperate for any coverage, especially if it helps get attention for Reform, the party she defected to

(this is not defending the act, just to call her the architect of anything is probably too much)

ChrisRR1 day ago
On brand with their platform of "Everything the current government does is bad so you should vote for us. We don't have any better solutions, we just know that it's bad"
red-iron-pineabout 18 hours ago
unfortunately that approach works
ablation1 day ago
Nadine Dorries is one of the least credible, least trustworthy political gadflies you could possibly imagine, only ever truly content when being fed the oxygen of publicity.
bad_username1 day ago
In the age of toxic empathy, "think about the children" is a very common tool for nefarious uses.
justinclift1 day ago
Hmmmm:

> By harmonizing to U.S. free speech standards, the UK will make it considerably easier, as a political matter, enter into data sharing and cross-border cooperation agreements, like CLOUD Act agreements, with the United States.

iamnothere1 day ago
Of note is that the author of this piece is the attorney defending 4chan et al against Ofcom, hence the slant and the general attitude.
stuaxo1 day ago
I'm not in favour of the online safety act, but the problem is she is incredibly stupid - nobody will listen to her.
kylegordon1 day ago
"harmonize UK and US law on political speech"

I can't think of anything worse. This is just the extreme right wing pushing the Overton Window even further

bonesss1 day ago
Step 1: reject and leave the EU to be free of their colonial rulers in Brussels

Step 2: harmonize all laws and regulations with EU anyways without voting influence because Single Market access is lucrative and vital

Step 3: start harmonizing other laws with the US in hopes of courting a new colonial ruler

Step 4: …?

———

With love, this feels like a situation where a good friend should simply have taken the car keys away.

JonAtkinson1 day ago
This is RWNJ garbage dressed up in false "think tank" legitimacy.
dijksterhuis1 day ago
tl;dr author wants uk to be more like the usa. nadine dorris complaining in an opinion column somewhere is a convenient way for him to pivot to talking about his think tank’s white paper about wanting to make that happen.