Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 205 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#game#fun#programming#idle#years#ago#playing#steam#run#anyone

Discussion (13 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

agmaterabout 6 hours ago
I've been playing this via Steam and having a lot of fun. It's very satisfying that you start simple and when you discover a new way you cleanly reset and do it better next run.
cautiouscatabout 2 hours ago
Woah! I loved this game on Steam. If anyone likes factory games (Satisfactory or Factorio) and programming this is a must try. Also got a bit of idle game in the mix. Surprisingly immersive too for a mostly text game.
srcreighabout 1 hour ago
Yep, the game has a fun offline idle mechanic as well as just leaving it running. However you should rarely need idle, if ever.
hyperificabout 1 hour ago
Played the heck out of this a few years ago until I found the mother of all automation scripts...which took all the fun out of it.
srcreighabout 1 hour ago
There’s probably some new mechanics in there since years ago which would give some more fun.
jason_sabout 1 hour ago
oog -- I do programming for work, don't really want to delve deep into it in a game ;-(
jamie_caabout 4 hours ago
For anyone coming back, the 3.0 release this month changed some APIs (so you'll need to update your scripts) but also added a new Darknet mechanic.
srcreighabout 2 hours ago
This is a fantastic game, I’ve played many hours of it. If you want a programming based video game this could be really fun for you.
skinfaxiabout 4 hours ago
The only game I've ever hit all achievements in! Very fun though I felt an internal pressure to move quickly, similar to the feeling I get when my factorio base starts getting big.
ivanjermakov44 minutes ago
Remember playing it for 20ish hours 3 years ago. Is there enough new changes to do another run?
mwhamabout 2 hours ago
10/10!
chipsraffertyabout 4 hours ago
Doesn't work well on mobile.
burgeroneabout 3 hours ago
Oh no