HI version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
75% Positive
Analyzed from 634 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#human#captcha#fun#claw#prove#machine#real#https#com#things

Discussion (32 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
edit: The page links to [1], but [1] has none of the information I'm really looking for -- why should somebody use this tool?
[1] https://github.com/mortspace/playcaptcha
Captcha are already expensive at scale due to escalating checks when abuse is detected. You have to orchestrate and pay for residential proxies, containers with different fingerprints, different behavioural data, clean IP rep, emulate device performance to avoid revealing youre running on a server... A 1-shot doesn't scale against this.
Also when you move the claw left and right, it "leans" in the wrong direction.
Fun idea though
A human would be incredibly suspicious of this.
but this is fun!
It requires you to solve a mate-in-one puzzle to, e.g., post on the forums.
(Sorry, don't have a better link, there wasn't any non-technical I could find about it).
https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/q19wgq/til_lichess_d...
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0b80b07b-d88f-414...
phpboard added captchas back in 2004.
Imagine you get pwned for trying this out in your home project and the APT escalates to your company repos and infects your company assets, and then the post mortem comes in and you have to explain this is what infected the company it stack
The only dependency is the 'motion' library.
[0]: https://github.com/mortspace/playcaptcha
Coworkers on project: "Containers? Not running things as root? Hah, you're overengineering things: Just follow the readme where it says to install the daemons and run the code directly. It works fine. Then we can show how we're using AI!"
(Yeah, I know it's hard to be perfectly secure, but still...)
If it is DNA then why would I need a claw machine? (Note that this defnition on DNA, which in itself is mega-odd since DNA differs, would mean that via synthetic biology one could yield humans - according to such a definition. But this does not have to be correct, so the definition would be flawed.)
If it is not DNA, how else to prove it?