HI version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
50% Positive
Analyzed from 1442 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#stock#ipo#shares#short#price#trade#don#long#company#more

Discussion (70 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
So guessing non investors in SpaceX are shorting for this event in expectation of a drop
Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, BoA, ect are the ones who set the IPO lockup terms based on their risk and exposure post IPO.
Indexes, exchanges, underwriters, ect are all private institutions who mostly can and do set their own rules.
Something like 20% can be sold after the q2 results are released
However it's not going up and later this month the first lockup period ends and people who got stock options are allowed to sell some of their stocks. These people don't care if the price is $134 or $135, because they go in much much lower, down to $30, from what I can tell. So starting this month there's going to be new shares available to buy, and the sellers are less critical of the price your offering.
What a weird way for them to say "we don't know"! It's like saying this house has 0 to 100 bathrooms.
> "I think it could be half over the course of the year," Noble said, adding that he believes a fair value for the shares is around $30, implying a decline of roughly 78% from current levels.
Particularly once it gets past the lockup period. If I had to guess I say a lot of folks are thinking a lot of people will sell post lock up and they’re timing their shorts around that date.
Basically an IPO is a bad bet for a five year position. But SPCX is especially bad.
> So there's as many people betting the stock will go up.
The first sentence is a useful reminder, but second has a error: A single person can have multiple bets, and not all bets are the same volume.
For example, Alice has a budget of $10 and believes the coin-flip will land Heads. Alice makes a $5 wager with Bob and a $3 wager with Carol and a $2 wager with Dan. The equilibrium is in money, rather than opinion-havers.
That's why saying "most shorted stock" is saying something and "every seller has a buyer" is not.
They are supposed to verify that before they place the trade and generally do follow the rules. Because if they don’t, they will be not allowed to allow any short sales for that security.
As index funds they were forced to buy. They are not taking any view.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2026-07-16/sho...
This was just a bag drop on retail and trying to force it into retirement funds proves it.
SpaceX stock erases all its gains and slides below IPO price in intraday trading
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933344
SpaceX bond worth 10% less than issue price – heading for junk bond status
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920181
He has a malignant narcissist’s distorted grasp of time: any future he promises is always nearer than is plausible, but the past is never finalised.
Same thing happening with "datacenters will destory the world because of their water use" BS