Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

67% Positive

Analyzed from 171 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#protocol#isps#anonymous#irresponsible#private#easier#penalize#customers#random#legal

Discussion (4 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

cocodill37 minutes ago
without the full info hash it's practically useless
bobpawabout 6 hours ago
An excellent reminder that torrent file sharing is by itself neither a private nor an anonymous protocol. Will this make it easier for ISPs to penalize their irresponsible customers?
goodmythicalabout 6 hours ago
The protocol was only ever intended to be distributed, not anonymous. Simple logic will tell you that blindly connecting your raw IP to random other IPs is not an anonymous function, regardless of the protocol.

You can, of course, take steps to increase anonymity while using most any protocol.

>Will this make it easier for ISPs to penalize their irresponsible customers?

Only if they (the ISP) are so irresponsible as to have not noticed a decade ago that such monitoring was already possible.

ogurechnyabout 5 hours ago
a) This is not hard evidence, even though it is mostly correct.

b) ISPs do not need to rely on some random server on the other side of the world watching a tiny amount of requests, they see the user traffic directly.

c) ISPs do not have the legal authority to investigate or penalise anyone, or even peek into private communication.

d) As we all know, c) is just a show, and governments and corporations routinely offer helpful services to each other under fake legal covers and self-lobbied decrees that make both sides seemingly not responsible for anything.