Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 168 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#graph#memory#datafusion#billion#using#noted#changed#old#opinion#previous

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

ratmice5 minutes ago
It would be nice if OP noted what changed between their old opinion, did datafusion gain some feature that they noted was missing in the previous article, or did something in their understanding click so they could overcome the previous issues?
chrisweekly39 minutes ago
> "I can compute PageRank on a directed graph with one billion edges (graph500-26 from the Graphalytics dataset) using 5 GB of memory. Alternatively, I can identify all the weakly connected components in a graph with two billion edges (twitter_mpi from the same dataset collection) using 10 GB of memory. Neither NetworkX nor Igraph can do this; most existing graph algorithms require the graph to fit into memory. Previously, I thought you needed Apache Spark and GraphFrames for billion-scale graph analytics. Now, however, I think all you need is a laptop. I have completely changed my old opinion about using Apache DataFusion for graph analytics."

Impressive!

anon772517 minutes ago
> most existing graph algorithms require the graph to fit into memory.

You can get pretty far with sparse graphs, which are just arrays, in combination with memory mapping.

theLiminator27 minutes ago
DataFusion is really cool, it's kind of like the LLVM of the OLAP world.
esafak34 minutes ago
Does it support out-of-core or multi-processor processing?
slopblastabout 2 hours ago
Really cool visualization, amazing how it resembles a neural network.