HI version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
75% Positive
Analyzed from 580 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#chip#chips#maybe#more#hidden#ago#nvidia#applying#random#inputs

Discussion (19 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
You can't tease out the right information by applying random inputs. Which input would you even use? The PCIe interface?
Your postdoc probably wrote micro-benchmarks of some sort. That is a common technique.
You'll have more luck reverse engineering the software driver first. They're not hidden, you can just open the driver files in Ghidra, the almost-universal tool for open-sourcing proprietary code. Hidden opcodes can be discovered first by just trying all the opcodes you couldn't discover any other way. You only need to go to the physical level if they're really hidden.
Theoretically Yes, as an ion-beam-mill and electron-microscope combination machine can slice up semiconductors layer-by-layer. Given these machines can often also give precise x-ray analysis material data, the exact makeup of the chip can be extracted by competitors given enough time. =3
Or maybe some kind of hybrid of x-ray microtomography and spectroscopic analysis all in one.
But, maybe the energies involved would be about the same destructive power as some microtome slicing technique...
I was waiting for some writeup about permutation decyphering
https://blog.dragonsector.pl/2017/10/?m=1
but reminds me how we're going to find out on an industrial level when the Saudis give China some nvidia chips they were grifted
they've cloned lots of chips before but nothing that advanced
Their market manipulation is further alleged, not settled. It was also not a high-frequency trading thing, so no, it wouldn't have required anything technically advanced like this either.