Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

69% Positive

Analyzed from 408 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#linux#licenses#exemption#software#law#browser#further#isn#specific#open

Discussion (18 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

gspr3 minutes ago
Rest of the headline: "software distributed under the GPL, MIT, BSD, and Apache licenses are exempt"

And then further into the text it's clarified that there also isn't a specific list of open licenses, as the terrible headline would have you believe, but instead a description of what is considered open

With the caveat that I haven't read the actual legal text, this seems to be an eminently sensible law (it'd be better if it weren't needed, but here we are).

In summary: not a Linux exemption, and not an exemption for a specific list of licenses either.

cm218712 minutes ago
Excellent. From now on all kids will become linux natives. The decade of the linux desktop is coming!
anigbrowlabout 1 hour ago
Weird how the people who habitually complain about government are conspicuously silent when it delivers something they wanted.
missinglugnut23 minutes ago
What do you want people to say? "Yay, the terrible law that threatened to make free computing illegal has an exemption for Linux. Now we only have to deal with unwanted mandatory age verification on all our non-linux devices. I'm so happy."
edotabout 1 hour ago
Yeah, this is fantastic. Should be top of the page. I’m honestly shocked, I’ve fully internalized that everything is corrupt and beholden to big corporations. Somehow, a victory! Looks like the Linux Foundation and EFF pushed back, but they’re not exactly big. Good job, California lawmakers!
zoobab37 minutes ago
Not a victory, Android is still covered.
qmarchi35 minutes ago
Hard to argue that it's open source...
throwawayqqq1111 minutes ago
This is not wanted, its duct taping a bad idea even further and i half-wish MS/apple/co sue against it. This may cause lawmakers to bounce back in the wrong direction though.
Pavilion209514 minutes ago
The age verification requirement wasn't dropped, what are you talking about? Linux getting an exemption isn't a win.
antonvs23 minutes ago
It delivered an arbitrary exception to a stupid law. If all someone wanted was an exception for Linux, they don’t understand the problem with this law.
squigz35 minutes ago
Indeed, this is very generous of them, and we should be thankful.
catlikesshrimp26 minutes ago
Sounds more like they did their job well, not that they are generous.
ghssds16 minutes ago
And now a bunch of OSI-Approved licenses get to have special rules applied to them, entrenching them and killing further innovation.
greyface-6 minutes ago
The bill exempts:

> a person or entity that distributes an operating system or application under license terms that permit a recipient to copy, redistribute, and modify the software

which at least doesn't choose specific winners and losers among licenses. It does disfavor license-free and public domain software, which isn't great.

catlikesshrimp33 minutes ago
Can someone the exemption for browser extensions and other contained software? My best guess is that the OS > Browser are reporting the age already, and the browser extensions will also use that "signal". Is this close enough?

" third carve-out excludes storefronts distributing extensions or add-ons that run exclusively inside a host application, which takes browser extension stores out of scope."

kersplodyabout 1 hour ago
Cool now let's exempt hobbyists from the 3-D printer must certify you are not printing gun parts pending legislation.
hardwaresoftonabout 1 hour ago
AGPL…?