HI version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
63% Positive
Analyzed from 491 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#dyson#vacuum#don#https#com#more#buy#probably#vacuums#sell

Discussion (16 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
Politically he was a loud backer of Brexit and then disappeared off to Singapore when it actually happened – he moved back two years later, perhaps having seen the bad PR but that's irrelevant.
"Inventor" wise its always the old story of over-engineered stuff of questionable practical quality. For example his "strawberries" are grown by some hyped-up heavily roboticised methodology, but they taste like crap compared to properly grown strawberries, and they are not much better than your average supermarket strawberry either – I did a comprehensive double-blind taste test with some friends. Meanwhile Dyson sells them at a vast markup.
He should have stopped at the vacuum cleaner, really. Preferably before then.
The Dyson one definitely seems to use more tech but probably does a similar thing.
I don't know where or not either of them improve brushing by a significant amount but if these companies want to spend their money on research then why not?
And I know people who have sprung for those detect laser vacuums and they all seem to love them.
EDIT: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49525964
https://www.wsj.com/video/series/in-depth-features/how-dyson...
I found it educational on product development (as a new startup founder/product developer myself).
I like our Dyson vacuum but now knowing what to expect when it needs fixing. Not a chance I'd buy a dyson anything again.
Generally I wipe my hands on my clothes or shake them around instead.