Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

46% Positive

Analyzed from 1472 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#south#park#both#more#don#same#years#sides#bad#pretty

Discussion (43 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

throw0101a28 minutes ago
Also:

“We especially want to thank our parent company Paramount -- a Skydance Capitulation.” (née 'Corporation')

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramount_Skydance

grebc21 minutes ago
Pretty clear there’s a lot of people here without a sense humour.
ChrisMarshallNY15 minutes ago
I have been informed that a common HN practice, is to have your sense of humor extracted, when getting your first colonoscopy.
XorNot15 minutes ago
It's just not that funny or clever.
readdit4 minutes ago
Name one funny and clever thing por favor.
kannanvijayan9 minutes ago
Nonsense, it's clearly tremendously Al-Adeen.
kklisura11 minutes ago
I wish they don't compete with reality. You cannot compete the absurdity of this reality. It's just not funny.
ChrisMarshallNY19 minutes ago
> We especially want to thank our parent company Paramount -- a Skydance Capitulation.

Sick burn.

gmuslera39 minutes ago
So instead of Blame Canada they will sing Blame Brazil?

When names collide everything start to lose meaning.

cyanydeez28 minutes ago
which benefits fascists, generally speaking. degrading global social communication enables the basal ganglia into the local us vs them.

As much as I find satire amusing, a lot of it does not do what people think it does as effectively in this context.

Sacha baron cohen, sining throw the jews down the well had a bunch of racists singing it with zero care what it's satiring. Dave chapelle did similar to black culture. South park gets pretty close to the same.

theres a bit overeliance on satirization. Paul ryan wasn't satirically listening to "Rage against the machine"; he was actively trying to redefine it for his own delusion.

ryandrake23 minutes ago
> Sacha baron cohen, sining throw the jews down the well had a bunch of racists singing it with zero care what it's satiring. Dave chapelle did similar to black culture. South park gets pretty close to the same.

I worked with people who totally missed the sarcasm and satire in Parker & Stone's Team America World Police and legit thought it was just a cool action movie about America kicking the world's ass. I had to double check before it dawned on me that they were serious.

philipallstar16 minutes ago
It benefits all sorts of types of people.
behringer14 minutes ago
Sarcasm wasn't designed for these people. They're simple people that will never allow themselves to be educated. Sarcasm is not for them, it's for the people around them.

You will never be able to stop the simple minded racist with your educational movie. He only consumes media that appeals to him. "Go woke go broke!" as they say. If you want to get through to him you need to appeal to his smarter friends and family. You can bring them together with sarcasm more than any other tool, because two people of opposing views can relate to the same media.

martythemaniakabout 2 hours ago
I watched South Park for almost 20 years, but stopped about a decade ago. Have the creators ever reconned with their role in normalizing and popularizing.. the current situation?

What I mean is, SP is one of most prominent cultural examples of " both sides are equally bad, everyone and everything sucks", they've had great success with this schtick, ManBearPig, Turd Sandwich, etc. They did a lot of prep work for the current regime, after all, once you but into their mindset, MAGA is the only thing that makes sense.

mattzitoabout 1 hour ago
I think it’s worth watching more recent seasons, at least from the first trump presidency. I agree that they had originally a “both sides bad” approach, but over the last 10 years or so, they have much more clearly come down on the side of “maga is wrong and evil”.

There are still a variety of subjects where I’m sure people on the other side of the aisle would take objection (i think of the ultra PC “pc principal” who demands that everyone honor everyone’s pronouns at the threat of violence). Last couple of years though, the tone has shifted, for example the depiction of trump as the literal duplicate of saddam Hussein and satans new boyfriend, who literally impregnates satan with the Antichrist, and then spends the season trying to abort it.

kylehotchkissabout 1 hour ago
You forgot the Emmy winning lovemaking scene between POTUS and VPOTUS
mywittynameabout 1 hour ago
They have not changed. They still maintain this "enlightened centrist" persona, while claiming "both sides are the same". And their social commentary, if you could call it that, is very tame. They did briefly lean into making politicians out to be evil, but they kind of walked that back and now their story lines read more goofy than anything.

The whole premise of the new season is telling. It's not about the suffering people have gone through due to wars (trade or military) or the food situation (the diarrhea parasite / cancer beef ep writes itself). Nope, it's about how the silly goose in office is renaming stuff.

It's possible to be serious and funny, but the new stuff I've seen has been unserious and unfunny.

EA-3167about 1 hour ago
CobrastanJorji9 minutes ago
See the word "rare" in the headline?

They didn't go after Gore because he was wrong. They went after him because he committed the cardinal sin of really, earnestly taking a stand on a big issue. That is NEVER okay in South Park. There is never a correct side. Both sides must always be bad, on every issue. The "correct" view in South Park is always to not really take a stance on anything, and any character who is strongly on one side or the other on any issue will always be portrayed as wrong to do so.

That's not to say that South Park doesn't have some great episodes poking fun at some very deserving targets. They absolutely do. Some real gems in recent seasons.

gjsman-1000about 1 hour ago
Well, I think both sides are the same to an uncomfortable degree. To quote Bill Maher:

“Trump has renamed Lake Ontario to the Lake of America. Of course, the left knows you can’t just rename things for political gain, just ask any Latinx birthing person.”

cogman1028 minutes ago
Really bad example by Maher.

There are much better examples where the 2 parties are frustratingly aligned to a large extent. For example, datacenters, ICE, and foreign policy. You can find a good number of democrats who are mad about Iran not because it's a dumb war, but because it wasn't done correctly by going through congress.

Both sides are aligned pretty closely in making their donors happy above their voters. That keeps democrats from regulating like they should and it keeps republicans focused on "the enemies within".

kg39 minutes ago
His examples don't hold up.

Latinx is attempting to provide an umbrella term for latino and latina, it's not renaming one of the two.

"Birthing person" is attempting to provide an umbrella term for people who can give birth that may or may not necessarily be female. (You can express your own feelings about the reality that this exists, but it does exist regardless of how you feel about it).

On the other hand Lake Ontario is a real lake that already had a name and now someone is trying to give it a new one.

jackp9634 minutes ago
Eh, it's a decent joke, but it seems like the power dynamics here are a bit out of balance?

Maybe I just live in a red area, but I see a lot of people judge liberals based on wild Twitter takes and random think pieces — which aren't actually policies/rule of law.

If Joe Biden signed an EO denouncing the use of the phrase "pregnant woman" in government documents as a queerphobic slur or mandating Gov employees add their pronouns to their email signatures, I'd find this take more compelling.

But he didn't.

liveoneggsabout 1 hour ago
south park is a product of the 1990's! its origins lean heavily on the still-true left/democratic party's pro-censorship leanings

just because the recent right/republicans were able to more effectively lean into the meme-heavy southpark-type (crude, male-targeted) humor as marketing doesn't really track with your last assertion (for me)

edoceo12 minutes ago
The US-Left is pro-censorship? My recent memory of headlines was the US-Right attempting to ban books. What am I missing?
jsiepkes25 minutes ago
They backtracked on "ManBearPig" (climate change) a long time ago.
dktp27 minutes ago
I think they're largely making fun of extremes, whether left, right or Kanye West, Disney/China, Scientology etc. (And once in a while apologize when they get it wrong, like Man Bear Pig) Lately the extremes are more extreme and powerful on the right and so more episodes target that

The last season made fun of ICE, Peter Thiel, Trump-gift-based-economy, shitcoins and so on (Labubus, 67, ...)

They also poked fun at themselves that South Park sucks now as it's all about politics, which I don't think they ever really wanted

I'm a big fan though

ipython22 minutes ago
Agreed. And they have been poking fun at the right for decades. Heck they made a whole movie about how ridiculous the global war on terror was, back in 2004.
Lammyabout 1 hour ago
> Have the creators ever reconned with their role in normalizing and popularizing.. the current situation?

For just one of them, ‘it never happened’ :p https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/ent/south-park-gaslights-a...

kyborenabout 1 hour ago
Yeah! And for that matter, has Jon Stewart atoned for his sin of leaving The Daily Show in 2015? If he had stayed, no way Trump could have won! And why didn't Oprah run in 2024--she could have saved us! It's all their fault!

Get real.

I don't think South Park ever implied both parties are equally bad. Just that they are both bad. And I don't think irreverent satire is prep work or psy-op propaganda for an authoritarian government. If anything, it's the inoculation.

It's quite clear that you haven't watched the series in the past decade. I'm sure you wouldn't be crowing the same tune if you'd watched the Mr. Garrison storyline.

kg35 minutes ago
I watched the first 13 seasons of South Park as they aired and the post you're replying to feels like at least a sincere and reasonable interpretation of SP's politics.

What season is the Mr. Garrison storyline from?

Why is it insufficient to (assuming the poster isn't lying to us) watch SP for 20 years before drawing a conclusion about it and the creators? They owned up to not having watched recently before asking about whether things have changed. I don't understand the weird hostility in your post when they owned up to the limitations of their PoV.

Jtsummers30 minutes ago
> What season is the Mr. Garrison storyline from?

It started about 10 years ago, when the person apparently stopped watching it, during the 2016 presidential campaign.

lobfabout 1 hour ago
This is why I stopped watching as well. They really set the table for conservative populists to feast. I resent them tremendously.
liveoneggs39 minutes ago
please expand
xingpedabout 1 hour ago
Why would they? They're firmly in the "too rich to care what the peasants think" bucket as well as not being culturally relevant for 20 years. Honestly, the fact that someone even posted here is pretty cringeworthy.
guywithahatabout 2 hours ago
Really brave of them to do something so courageous and stunning
bena29 minutes ago
To be fair, they don't have many levers to pull
sethops122 minutes ago
They're both billionaires. That's enough to swing a few elections and not even notice.
tt2420 minutes ago
Interesting that Bloomberg couldn’t swing his own election